Do it by rote!

Reply #49

Lucky Loser — Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:28:39 GMT

Reply #48

eddessaknight — Wed, 10 Oct 2018 02:19:23 GMT

HeyLucky Loser, thanks for the good stuff !

Money won tastes twice as sweet as money earned

Pro-Player FairGame advocate

Eddessa_Knight with Lucky Light

Reply #47

Lucky Loser — Tue, 09 Oct 2018 22:56:25 GMT

I believe like you said at least if you see something, then perhaps you can work it in your favor.

You can absolutely work an observation to your favor, and, I actually prefer to recognize this as creating the atmosphere for the win. In my very honest opinion based on my own personal experiences, a player with a decent system should be able to look at a given draw result and know if they could've won had they played. Maybe I over simplified that but, I know for a fact that it's still an entir... [ More ]

Reply #46

Soledad — Mon, 08 Oct 2018 09:31:13 GMT

Yeah I know. So for that month I did all just to see. So 53 numbers all just from calculator, 9 were relevant for that month, all before, but the time was different for each. The triple showed right after, and 560 showed as 605 the night after. Those were the two best. Out of all there were 3 straights and 6 boxes, with one box being a repeat. I know, but at the same time, there s many flaws to this, such as all the numbers being clustered around the same hundred digit. But if really used and th... [ More ]

Reply #45

Lucky Loser — Sun, 07 Oct 2018 17:13:09 GMT

Well, as my friend says, to each his/her own which really is all that matters if something works. However, working one time on a technicality and still lacking the ability to repeat that win with 'intent' leaves much to be desired. A given input for a given output, an expected result based on preset parameters, ensures the player that they can recover losses while still turning a reasonably consistent profit. I love playing in the water as it allows for much better odds.

Reply #44

One2win — Sun, 07 Oct 2018 03:06:42 GMT

Call it what you will, Tucker Black - the $hit works sometimes, tends to work better with pairs than single digits, tho. Combining pairs and singles digits out gives you a little better odds in yr work-out.

Reply #43

Soledad — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 23:33:16 GMT

Yes and no. Re-categorizing? perhaps is the word ,after well there is some figuring that needs to be done. This is half the example I showed you of the whole thing. I like to use results with other things? perhaps could be anything really I just guess if something shows me something I follow it. Here like,

September 1 : 430,669,340,084,104,331,to 637 (7) add up to 2595/ 7=370. Add lotto math same 7, get 375. Add again 645. 406 next flip 0. But next 7, 669 to 406, same math is 367(hmm)+241=508... [ More ]

Reply #42

Tucker Black — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 23:22:03 GMT

That's called the Gambler's Fallacy.

Reply #41

One2win — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 22:45:57 GMT

Just wanted to put my .05c in on this topic/debate, with reference to the randomness of things: i.e to say this: Random makes predictabilty more possible . If the numbers generated were basically the same each time because they were programmed , then this too would be predictable by virtue of the programming. For instance, in the case of the pick 3, if a program was in place that generated selected numbers to have the digit 7 in each play, then once that trend is noticed, it would be advantageou... [ More ]

Reply #40

Lucky Loser — Sat, 06 Oct 2018 15:49:23 GMT

Not quite the math nor the application thereof I was thinking but, interesting nonetheless. So, have you discovered any consistency here that will keep you ahead in any way? Is it based on only four midday draws which produces a reasonably expected result on the corresponding 4th day evening draw? I think this theory can be tested and, for the record, I'm neither looking for a system nor trying to expose your approach here. However, you've provided what seems to be a given input for a given outp... [ More ]

Reply #39

adobea78 — Tue, 02 Oct 2018 12:57:48 GMT

With all the respect, Bobby 623, I don't believe in paper-and-pencil methods for lotteries, particularly if they are as complex and labor intensive as yours.

The reason for this is such.

The human brain is much more complex, sophisticated and functional than any computer! .The computer's calculating power is just mind boggling. The computer takes input from us, not the other way around. Try telling the device to proof why ncr = n! / r! * (n - r)!, it can't, but it can calculate any combina... [ More ]

Reply #38

Soledad — Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:13:04 GMT

I didn t mean to put that I thought I was putting it here when I looked I didn t see it so I did it again but thought I was putting it on here in this. Anyways sorry, that s okay maybe not a good start but in the start may be good to watch and see direction may not be as planned something else might come up, happens,but stick to the plan,, tbh I can t even follow it but I like to follow things if I can. I usually twist them to mine etc,, ok but I would never hijack a fellow af man, well at least... [ More ]

Reply #37

Stack47 — Tue, 02 Oct 2018 03:54:37 GMT

Just an observation; most of your threads get hijacked. Wonder why

Reply #36

Soledad — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 04:14:59 GMT

Cool. I ve been doing same thing for the past 3 weeks on the dream team thread. Every sunday post 14 numbers one for every draw pick3 game. I think first week there was one, and the next 2 there was 2 each with one straight 731. Only part that is trouble is the exact days matching so that change the bet structure , but still even one 50/50 and one 50 box is still profitable on paper with paper ...

Good luck to you bobby623.

Reply #35

bobby623 — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 03:43:50 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/322830

Seems we may be trapped in a circular argument.

I seriously doubt that anyone will change the way they are doing things.

I'm a little surprised that some folks believe my grade school-level workout is too complex for average lottery gamblers.

The biggest problem is my inability to post samples of the tracking charts.

Trying to explain what I do with words apparently doesn't provide the clarity a newbie needs.

Sorry, but there is no w... [ More ]

Reply #34

amber124 — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 02:15:57 GMT

Can you please elaborate more on this? Short explanations don't really help much.

Reply #33

aquariuslottery — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 01:27:16 GMT

With all the respect, Bobby 623, I don't believe in paper-and-pencil methods for lotteries, particularly if they are as complex and labor intensive as yours.

The reason for this is such.

I do computer programming, although not for living but do monetize my creations.

Some time ago (perhaps 5 years) I was asked by a fellow from Europe (I don't know if he is a member of LP) to computerize a Pick 3 vertical positional skips chart that he put into a spreadsheet. It took me some time t... [ More ]

Reply #32

Soledad — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 01:13:13 GMT

I never get quoted,:(

NY DRAWS: August 17th midday to August 20th midday::::;

925+677+051+228+342+348+541=3112

3112 divided by 7 (the mean)=444

AUGUST 20th EVENING DRAW - 444...!

Dont ever talk to me about math.Unless you re willing.

Reply #31

aquariuslottery — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 22:55:24 GMT

Tucker Black

All the numbers have exactly the same chance of being in the next drawing. It's not grade school level stuff to try to predict them with a simple system (or complicated), it's a complete waste of time.

Bobby623

However, when consecutive winning combinations are logged according to a plan, the results are not as random as you obviously want everyone and their brothers and sisters to believe.

I log every Cash 5 drawing everyday and my data pretty wells shows that arranging... [ More ]

Reply #30

bobby623 — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:00:37 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/321018

When I started playing the lottery years ago, I counted numbers and played the ones with the highest totals.

Since then, I switch to some math-based workouts.

Later, I decided that mathematics was the BEST way to lose money.

Basically, I decided that trying to manage a game 'en masse', or all at once, was too difficult and not likely to win any thing.

Thus, I created a substitution method where a game is divided into 3 parts, according... [ More ]

Reply #29

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:59:22 GMT

Well, the bottom line in all this is whatever bobby623 is doing works for him.

More power to him. We all (or most of us) are looking for that little method to help us win money. Nothing wrong with that.

Reply #28

Soledad — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:33:25 GMT

We re not looking for excuses by the way. You always tell of your system as the only way, and better than all the rest. But you never seem to talk about it much. Other than vague general opinions of your own. Perhaps I m wrong, but it s a lot of speech with no direction in my view. I do use math by the way. And I ve won more than that this year alone, almost double by now but not quite. To be totally honest, you d be surprised how much I could ve won and the numbers I ve had written down at the

Reply #27

Tucker Black — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:44:56 GMT

Each number has the same chance of being chosen as a winning number, so any time you spend trying to predict the future is a waste of time. If you waste too much time doing this, you could get a part-time job and use the earnings to buy lots more tickets, which improves the probability of winning a big prize.

It's that simple... if you want to improve your probability of winning a large prize, then earn more money and spend it on lottery tickets. Mathematics and intuition agree on that one.... [ More ]

Reply #26

bobby623 — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:31:46 GMT

Amazing!

Seems personal opinions rule the day!

I have a systematic workout that requires data to be processed by rote in accordance with a plan.

The end result is two data strings that can be analyzed and used to choose which integers seem to have the best chance of winning.

However, to win I have to make multiple correct guesses, which isn't as easy as it may seem.

Mathematics has a role in lottery play.

I don't think I ever said otherwise.

I just say I can win with my meth... [ More ]

Reply #25

Soledad — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 01:27:11 GMT

The first half of that first paragraph is very sound.Whole second one too. Thanks. Good to think about.

Reply #24

Lucky Loser — Sat, 29 Sep 2018 23:26:37 GMT

Okay, so 'rote' can and is definitely applicable to the the Pick games but, I believe that the most important variable is that what the player is basing their rote approach on must also be consistent with their rote. Make sense? See, rote is supposed to produce the same output for the same consistent input but, the player must also know the 'what' and 'why' aspects of their particular rote...which ultimately results in a 'system.' Rote equals the player filing away what they've learned based on... [ More ]

Reply #23

Stack47 — Sat, 29 Sep 2018 04:23:20 GMT

Lots of Keno players do it by rote . They notice some numbers being drawn together and play them. Some other players do it in reverse, they play numbers that are not drawn together like the four spot I played tonight.

Reply #22

bobby623 — Sat, 29 Sep 2018 02:52:16 GMT

I've won about $8,000 playing Texas Daily 4 over the past 3 years.

I hit a straight for $5,000 with 1 of 4 tickets.

I posted a copy of the ticket.

I will have to buy an awful lot of tickets before my ROI for this game goes red.

I have a system that works without mathematics.

How much have you won with your math?????

I doubt you are ahead.

It's time to wrap this Topic up.

You go ahead with your math, I'll keep going with my substitution methods.

Thanks for your interest... [ More ]

Reply #21

Tucker Black — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:55:16 GMT

Just the winning tickets is only half the story. How many tickets did you buy in total? Are you ahead or behind?

If you're not going to do any math, you should save yourself some money and stop playing the lottery.

Reply #20

amber124 — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 05:15:32 GMT

I think what we should do is do it by vote. LOL

By the show of hands, who wants me to win the jackpot?

I see one hand, 101 and 102 we going for two hands to hands to hands,..... Do I hear 3 hands-free hands-free him

Reply #19

bobby623 — Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:05:46 GMT

Statistical evidence?

No, I don't do math.

Send me an email address and I'll send you copies of many winning tickets.

Thanks for your interest.

Reply #18

Tucker Black — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:59:32 GMT

Do you have statistical evidence that your system works

Reply #17

bobby623 — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 22:21:29 GMT

It amazes me that some people think they can win a lottery prize with little or no effort.|

Doing things by rote is a means to an end.

Face it. Do you think the British broke the German codes by analyzing a couple of messages?

If I recall correctly, it took a lot people doing a lot of stuff by rote day after day after day.

Fortunately, they didn't get bored or lazy.

They laid the groundwork that eventually paid off, and saved lives.

It's the same with lottery analysis.

You h... [ More ]

Reply #16

Tucker Black — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:07:47 GMT

Different games means 4 spots, 5 spots, 6 spots, etc.

Reply #15

GuesssWork — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:56:42 GMT

Doing it by rote will cause most probably I believe to simply give up and besides where is the instant gratification in rote anyway.. .. not easy and boring why keep doing the same process over and over and .. Its the modern day way man who wants to work hard repetitively at anything, unless you know there is a real reward for you at the end..

most are not going to follow any process involving lots of effort that's the real problem..

Reply #14

GuesssWork — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:37:24 GMT

Sole buddy you have read waaaaay to much into my a sentence or two statement it was not an opinion.. anything else you have added it was not I..some lotteries not all are going out with the old ballsets and in with the new technologies.. This is Evolving what you have said I have no idea

Reply #13

Soledad — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:38:46 GMT

I see no proof of chips being used in balls; counting chips also no significance to bias. You re ignoring security that is in place; as well as has been determined by actual breaches. Besides counting has to with the numbers. You take it a step further turn it to negative, which it will take you. It s obviously random by the number not coming up when you just say so. But using ideas , while of course ideas pursued are ideas pursued further, but besides that point, you re using rules that in theo... [ More ]

Reply #12

grwurston — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:38:51 GMT

Here is how they make the lottery balls.

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/321208/5596793

Reply #11

Soledad — Tue, 25 Sep 2018 01:49:20 GMT

Im very curious if that is your true opinion, or perhaps it is the necessity of the mind to come up with just about anything and everything, but if that is your opinion, why would Lotteries be auditing every single game, and I quote among others that the auditors sole purpose is to 1. Maintain public trust 2. Ensure integrity and security 3. Ensure equipments integrity and lastly 4. To ensure the advertised numbers are reflective of the actual drawings. These are internal audits. They have too m... [ More ]

Reply #10

amber124 — Mon, 24 Sep 2018 20:12:25 GMT

No I never said that. Well let's look at the details, they have three sets of machines that they rotate, I forget how many ball sets that they rotate, they do up to 7 pre-tests and I forget how many post-tests. All this while they're shuffling the machines around and the ball sets around. I fail to see how people don't find this uncomfortable.

Next time you go to play Slots in a casino, I hope you don't have some official come by you while you're playing at the slot machine and tell you... [ More ]

Reply #9

GuesssWork — Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:59:47 GMT

I use math to improve my chances of winning at keno by analyzing the different games. why not just go with a quick pick they all have the same chances of winning..

Reply #8

GuesssWork — Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:44:24 GMT

Some are not even ping pong balls, Just balls.Some may have RFID chips inside but as far as tampered with i'd say, they are evolving.

Reply #7

Tucker Black — Mon, 24 Sep 2018 06:24:08 GMT

Are you suggesting the lottery's ping pong balls have been tampered with

Reply #6

amber124 — Mon, 24 Sep 2018 04:40:45 GMT

Those statistics that you presented are very true, however, those statistics become skewed if tampered with. Don't you at least agree with that? Just like everything else that relies on a system to work in a sort of Natural Way, such as the weather, or any other unpredictable events, there's a bassline to those events that is the common denominator. When you mess with the common denominator, you messed everything up.

So basically statistics become worthless at that point.

If I'm a war... [ More ]

Reply #5

bobby623 — Mon, 24 Sep 2018 02:21:04 GMT

Who said anything about 'patterns' in the drawing machine outputs?

Logging the results in certain ways will generate 'trends' that can be quantified and used to find the best answer to the main question - What's Next?

Yes, it's guesswork but correct choices always win.

Random has many definitions.

There is plenty of evidence that despite the random way winning lottery integers are chosen, there are ways to use random to our advantage.

Reply #4

Tucker Black — Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:40:46 GMT

Which is it? Is it random or is it not?

It is random. Yes, you can look at past data and find a pattern. That doesn't mean the pattern will continue. Sometimes patterns continue, and sometimes they don't. It's random. So it doesn't matter which numbers you picked, every ticket has the same chance of winning.

I use math to improve my chances of winning at keno by analyzing the different games.

Reply #3

bobby623 — Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:05:44 GMT

Tucker Black

If you would step back and view some actual drawings, you will soon have to accept the following:

Please go to www.txlotto.org and view the prior Cash 5 drawings.

You will see 37 balls in a single vessel being agitated by compressed air and other features.

You will also notice that during a drawing the escape hatch on top of the drum opens at an irregular rate allowing one ball to travel down a chute.

This happens 5 times. As a result, the combined output is a winning... [ More ]

Reply #2

ancient40 — Sun, 23 Sep 2018 22:58:43 GMT

question for you..Do you drink alcohol smoke or eat any type of fried foods or anyone close to you...

Reply #1

Tucker Black — Sun, 23 Sep 2018 22:19:39 GMT

All the numbers have exactly the same chance of being in the next drawing. It's not grade school level stuff to try to predict them with a simple system (or complicated), it's a complete waste of time.

Do it by rote!

bobby623 — Sun, 23 Sep 2018 22:12:11 GMT

Whatever happened to doing things by rote???

IMHO and FWIW

It seems we are in a time where people can't seem to function unless they know the 'why' for every activity they are interested in.

Rather than accepting something at face value, many people want to argue over the details.

As a result, the voices involved end up in 'circular arguments' that rarely have a satisfactory ending.

This malady also affects lottery play,

Seems some people who come to LP for handouts think they... [ More ]