- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 12:57 pm
You last visited
June 3, 2026, 5:36 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Do it by rote!Prev TopicNext Topic
-
Quote: Originally posted by Soledad on Sep 30, 2018
We’re not looking for excuses by the way. You always tell of your system as the only way, and better than all the rest. But you never seem to talk about it much. Other than vague general opinions of your own. Perhaps I’m wrong, but it’s a lot of speech with no direction in my view. I do use math by the way. And I’ve won more than that this year alone, almost double by now but not quite. To be totally honest, you’d be surprised how much I could’ve won and the numbers I’ve had written down at the time. As well as some of the numbers that have shown from ways I do things. You’d honestly be surprised.
Problem with ‘math’ is sometimes you forget how you do something, and you have to do it every single time and it takes time, and then when you’re done you have to think about it on top of it. It can be distracting. And it can take time. And after all this is more of a hobby than a real job. But I see no other better way to show you something to see the number before hand, and in essence actually track, than math. As I’m sure you say the same thing of your ways. It doesn’t make one wrong or right. It depends on the person. But I’m still not sure what your overall point is after all these years. Just my opinion.
https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/321018
When I started playing the lottery years ago, I counted numbers and played the ones with the highest totals.
Since then, I switch to some math-based workouts.
Later, I decided that mathematics was the BEST way to lose money.
Basically, I decided that trying to manage a game 'en masse', or all at once, was too difficult and not likely to win any thing.
Thus, I created a substitution method where a game is divided into 3 parts, according to specific rules of procedure.
Game history is then used to generate several tracking charts that, in turn, generate 'data strings' that reflect observable trends that can be quantified and used to choose numbers for play.
Every action is based on specific rules.
The only mathematics, or arithmetic, required is an ability to count to 16.
There are no mathematical formulae, no odds, no probability, no percentages.
The final action is a combination of intellect and experience.
I analyze the data and make the best choices, actually, best guesses, about what could happen next.
Yes, it's educated guesswork.
I don't always make the best choices, but, I'm winning often enough to make it all worthwhile.
FYI
I've made some significant changes to my workout.
Be on the lookout for some Texas Daily 4 postings for the 12:27 pm Monday through Saturday drawings.
Lastly.
I'm not saying that my methods are superior to what other people do.
I have made many posts regarding my methods.
Anyone interested in something new should give substitution a try.
But, be advised. It's not something that can be done on the fly.
The link and other posts, will give you an idea of my methods.
No, I will not be a teacher.
If you aren't talented enough to do it on your own, then try something else.
Thanks for your interest.
PS If a winning ticket is not enough to show that a method works, then what is??
I think the ROI stuff is just a distraction that suggests that there are no winning tickets to show. -
Tucker Black
All the numbers have exactly the same chance of being in the next drawing. It's not grade school level stuff to try to predict them with a simple system (or complicated), it's a complete waste of time.Bobby623
However, when consecutive winning combinations are logged according to a plan, the results are not as random as you obviously want everyone and their brothers and sisters to believe.
I log every Cash 5 drawing everyday and my data pretty wells shows that arranging and rearranging game history according to certain rules provides some interesting opportunities and general clues about future outcomes.
All I have to do is find the clues and make good choices.Tucker Black
Yes, you can look at past data and find a pattern. That doesn't mean the pattern will continue. Sometimes patterns continue, and sometimes they don't. It's random. So it doesn't matter which numbers you picked, every ticket has the same chance of winning.Bobby623
Logging the results in certain ways will generate 'trends' that can be quantified and used to find the best answer to the main question - What's Next?
Yes, it's guesswork but correct choices always win.
Random has many definitions.
There is plenty of evidence that despite the random way winning lottery integers are chosen, there are ways to use random to our advantage.Tucker Black
Just the winning tickets is only half the story. How many tickets did you buy in total? Are you ahead or behind?
If you're not going to do any math, you should save yourself some money and stop playing the lottery.Lucky Loser
However, I personally believe that a player needs consistency with the Pick games in order for the 'positive cash flow' to be realized and utilized in their daily life, and, luck isn't consistent. When I say consistent, I mean winning enough and 'often' enough to where the player doesn't go into the red...and it DOESN'T mean that the player has to win on every single draw. Consistency with gambling simply means that the player wins enough money often enough to keep them ahead of the game...that's it. * No one will win on every single draw....PERIOD. Every player, no matter how great their system and 'rote' is, will have to give back some of the profits they've won from the house, okay. Again, rote is actually a required input for success but, is also useless if the player fails to input that same information based on those equal circumstances which they won on. In essence, the player is still trying to create a 'SYSTEM'...and this same system is still based on 'NUMBERS.' Now, if a player isn't implementing math with their system them, it's impossible for them to know just how far ahead or in the hole they really are in the game. I could care less about winning tickets. What I'd want to verify is the 'time line' BETWEEN those winning tickets as that makes all the difference in just how well one's rote-based system really is. Let's see the LOSING TICKETS with the DATES AND EXPENSES and add all those up and then compare those to the posted winning tickets. *That will tell all in terms of TRUE PROFITS. Anyone can post a winning ticket but, just how long has it been since that player actually won...and how much did they win at that time. So forth and so on. I'm not picking on anyone, just stating what is also applied to any business claiming to be thriving....WE NEED ALL THE NUMBERS, NOT JUST THE GOOD ONES.Bobby623
Now, one win is not enough. You now have to have multiple wins and a favorable return on investment.
Otherwise, the method used is just a waste of time.
I doubt a majority of lottery gamblers have a favorable ROI, assuming they even think about one.Tucker Black
Each number has the same chance of being chosen as a winning number, so any time you spend trying to predict the future is a waste of time. If you waste too much time doing this, you could get a part-time job and use the earnings to buy lots more tickets, which improves the probability of winning a big prize.It's that simple... if you want to improve your probability of winning a large prize, then earn more money and spend it on lottery tickets. Mathematics and intuition agree on that one.
Hi to all,
Above are some excerpts (together with their authors) that may be helpful in understanding my ramblings below.
System or no system, there is only one infallible way to improve your chances of winning - buy more tickets. Consider simple Pick 3. Buy 1 ticket and you get 0.1% chance of winning anything. Buy 10 and you are at 1%. It does not matter what crap you put in your tickets - your chances are still the same. That's the baseline.
So a question should be asked: is my system currently working a) better, b) same or c) worse than the baseline in either the given time or overall? If b) or c) apply why bother to play the system, use quick pick and save time, or dust off your drawing board. That's the first measurement that should be used for evaluating any system.
How about if you put something better than crap in your tickets? There seem to be consensus that all numerical lotteries exhibit presence of trends. We detect trends from the past draws. We may learn what they are, how often they appeared in the past and what were their durations. That's the only knowledge we may acquire from the analysis of the past. But nothing about the future. Assuming that because a pattern appeared X number of times in Y stretch of time so it will appear at a predictable Z time is a bit naive. Patterns are as random as numbers themselves (agree with Tucker Black). I don't think that anybody can accurately time either single numbers or patterns on consistent basis. At least I found it impossible. That's why I work with groups of numbers and groups of patterns and observe their performance all the time as their results fluctuate constantly.
Patterns do have one useful characteristic that can be exploited - duration. Some may last for quite a while and if you can detect such a pattern early enough you can use it for playing. So I put results of the most successful current trend(s) in my tickets to enhance their chances of winning (above the baseline as much as possible). It's always a guess but quite often successful because of this reason - many times not only 1 pattern is winning at the same time but several, so no matter what I picked for playing I may end up a winner.
As Tucker Black said if you want to win more money you have to play more tickets. Nothing more true than that. Which brings us to the subject of ROI (Lucky Loser and Bobby623). This is the second, and more important, measurement of any systems. It allows for a direct comparison between systems, regardless of any claims from their designers, owners or users. If in the past 3 months your system made you more money than mine (after deducting costs) it is simply better and it would be stupid to argue otherwise. So I always monitor ROI no matter what I play. There are 2 goals in this: stay above red for as long as possible, or reduce red as much as possible. The choice of goal may depend on lottery. In Pick 3 the first is quite realistic but in jackpots the second takes priority. Always maximize you winnings for this reason - you can put more money into tickets (and increase you chances of winning) and it will not come from your pocket, your friendly lottery corp will pay for it. I find it satisfying in itself.
There are 2 essential elements in playing any lottery - your strategy and luck. Maximize the first and minimixe the latter. I don't believe that playing 1-2 tickets at a time leaves much room for applying strategies. If you have consistently good returns on your plays (backtrack that) why not to play more? Even if you spend $50 for each play but your ROI is 80% you actually spent only $10. Unrealistic? Check with Pick 3 players. I believe some may have had returns better than flimsy 80%, at least in some periods of time.
Aquarius
......
-
I never get quoted,:(
NY DRAWS: August 17th midday to August 20th midday::::;
925+677+051+228+342+348+541=3112
3112 divided by 7 (the mean)=444
AUGUST 20th EVENING DRAW - 444...!
Dont ever talk to me about math.Unless you’re willing.
Sometimes you do the right thing just because it’s right.
Life's a game of mathematics, if you can't figure that out I don't know what to tell you.
-
Quote: Originally posted by bobby623 on Sep 30, 2018
https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/321018
When I started playing the lottery years ago, I counted numbers and played the ones with the highest totals.
Since then, I switch to some math-based workouts.
Later, I decided that mathematics was the BEST way to lose money.
Basically, I decided that trying to manage a game 'en masse', or all at once, was too difficult and not likely to win any thing.
Thus, I created a substitution method where a game is divided into 3 parts, according to specific rules of procedure.
Game history is then used to generate several tracking charts that, in turn, generate 'data strings' that reflect observable trends that can be quantified and used to choose numbers for play.
Every action is based on specific rules.
The only mathematics, or arithmetic, required is an ability to count to 16.
There are no mathematical formulae, no odds, no probability, no percentages.
The final action is a combination of intellect and experience.
I analyze the data and make the best choices, actually, best guesses, about what could happen next.
Yes, it's educated guesswork.
I don't always make the best choices, but, I'm winning often enough to make it all worthwhile.
FYI
I've made some significant changes to my workout.
Be on the lookout for some Texas Daily 4 postings for the 12:27 pm Monday through Saturday drawings.
Lastly.
I'm not saying that my methods are superior to what other people do.
I have made many posts regarding my methods.
Anyone interested in something new should give substitution a try.
But, be advised. It's not something that can be done on the fly.
The link and other posts, will give you an idea of my methods.
No, I will not be a teacher.
If you aren't talented enough to do it on your own, then try something else.
Thanks for your interest.
PS If a winning ticket is not enough to show that a method works, then what is??
I think the ROI stuff is just a distraction that suggests that there are no winning tickets to show.With all the respect, Bobby 623, I don't believe in paper-and-pencil methods for lotteries, particularly if they are as complex and labor intensive as yours.
The reason for this is such.
I do computer programming, although not for living but do monetize my creations.
Some time ago (perhaps 5 years) I was asked by a fellow from Europe (I don't know if he is a member of LP) to computerize a Pick 3 vertical positional skips chart that he put into a spreadsheet. It took me some time to understand his concepts of generating the results from the skips but once I got it running, from the beginning his manual results and mine computerized were at odds. He simply had manual computing errors which he never noticed although he was very diligent. His manual results made him assume that certain probabilities took place which, unfortunately, were only the results of errors. Ultimately, I found his concept of vertical skips an interesting approach for Pick 3 predictions, although it was too erratic to use on consistent basis, particularly for backtracking.
The problem is not that we make errors. The problem is that oftentimes we cannot see them even if we checked our data dozens of times. Happened to me before and not only once.
The second problem is that even one error in data may skew the prediction results for a long time. Accidentally introduce more errors and your results may be completely off (happened to me, too). Not to mention the amount of time required to do more complex computations (and yours seem to be such).
So if I see a system that is worth consideration I have to computerize it first. 3 reasons for that: 1) I reduce the data entry to only one point (the last draw) which is easy to verify (and I'm very strict in verifying the input so no garbage goes in), 2) computer does the computations very fast and efficiently and will never screw them up, and 3) this gives me an opportunity to backtrack instantly to see the past performance; my approach is to never play anything no matter how successful it is claimed to be if I cannot backtrack the claims' credibility. Not only this, I like to have an option for "what if" scenarios that may allow me to see what works and what doesn't at any given time. The need for "what if" scenarios was actually the main incentive that made me computerize my stuff - I tried manually and it took me half a day (and God only knows how accurate it was) to create one scenario compared with 0.5 sec with 100% accuracy for the computer. And I can test not only one but dozens of scenarios in minutes. No contest.
Although some computer gurus state that if you want things screwed up real good use a computer I believe they can be used for simplifying things as well. Why did they introduce computers in the first place? To make computing things easier.
Some more thoughts regarding "what if" scenarios.
You designed your system and refined its performance over the time, I assume. It seem to be working well for you. For me, no matter how successful my stuff is I always ask myself a question - is there anything better than this? I don't believe that there is one always-winning system for any lottery. Sometimes you take a system that generally shows a lousy performance, change a parameter or 2 in it and you may get totally different results.
An example that I'm tempted to explore in the future. The pyramid system based on draw date for Pick 3. As silly as it may appear (what the date has in common with number prediction?) but has anyone explored its effectiveness in "what if" scenarios? For how long should the numbers be played? One draw, 2 draws, 3, more than that? How long would it take to compute 30-day simulation for just one option? (and 30 days is the minimum I would consider). And how does the 1 day play compare with 2,3 etc. Which one is better at this given time (this may fluctuate even from day to day). Try to do this manually, good luck. But this is an essential information to know before making a decision what to play. Any wonder that folks that played pyramid complained about results (or rather lack of such)? How do they know how the method performs today? Because this method won some time ago it does not mean it is winning today.And that's the reasons I don't use paper-and-pencil methods. Too error-prone, often too much time consuming to compute and information they provide is often too limited to make them an effective playing tool. But that's just MHO.
Aquarius......
-
Quote: Originally posted by aquariuslottery on Sep 30, 2018
With all the respect, Bobby 623, I don't believe in paper-and-pencil methods for lotteries, particularly if they are as complex and labor intensive as yours.
The reason for this is such.
I do computer programming, although not for living but do monetize my creations.
Some time ago (perhaps 5 years) I was asked by a fellow from Europe (I don't know if he is a member of LP) to computerize a Pick 3 vertical positional skips chart that he put into a spreadsheet. It took me some time to understand his concepts of generating the results from the skips but once I got it running, from the beginning his manual results and mine computerized were at odds. He simply had manual computing errors which he never noticed although he was very diligent. His manual results made him assume that certain probabilities took place which, unfortunately, were only the results of errors. Ultimately, I found his concept of vertical skips an interesting approach for Pick 3 predictions, although it was too erratic to use on consistent basis, particularly for backtracking.
The problem is not that we make errors. The problem is that oftentimes we cannot see them even if we checked our data dozens of times. Happened to me before and not only once.
The second problem is that even one error in data may skew the prediction results for a long time. Accidentally introduce more errors and your results may be completely off (happened to me, too). Not to mention the amount of time required to do more complex computations (and yours seem to be such).
So if I see a system that is worth consideration I have to computerize it first. 3 reasons for that: 1) I reduce the data entry to only one point (the last draw) which is easy to verify (and I'm very strict in verifying the input so no garbage goes in), 2) computer does the computations very fast and efficiently and will never screw them up, and 3) this gives me an opportunity to backtrack instantly to see the past performance; my approach is to never play anything no matter how successful it is claimed to be if I cannot backtrack the claims' credibility. Not only this, I like to have an option for "what if" scenarios that may allow me to see what works and what doesn't at any given time. The need for "what if" scenarios was actually the main incentive that made me computerize my stuff - I tried manually and it took me half a day (and God only knows how accurate it was) to create one scenario compared with 0.5 sec with 100% accuracy for the computer. And I can test not only one but dozens of scenarios in minutes. No contest.
Although some computer gurus state that if you want things screwed up real good use a computer I believe they can be used for simplifying things as well. Why did they introduce computers in the first place? To make computing things easier.
Some more thoughts regarding "what if" scenarios.
You designed your system and refined its performance over the time, I assume. It seem to be working well for you. For me, no matter how successful my stuff is I always ask myself a question - is there anything better than this? I don't believe that there is one always-winning system for any lottery. Sometimes you take a system that generally shows a lousy performance, change a parameter or 2 in it and you may get totally different results.
An example that I'm tempted to explore in the future. The pyramid system based on draw date for Pick 3. As silly as it may appear (what the date has in common with number prediction?) but has anyone explored its effectiveness in "what if" scenarios? For how long should the numbers be played? One draw, 2 draws, 3, more than that? How long would it take to compute 30-day simulation for just one option? (and 30 days is the minimum I would consider). And how does the 1 day play compare with 2,3 etc. Which one is better at this given time (this may fluctuate even from day to day). Try to do this manually, good luck. But this is an essential information to know before making a decision what to play. Any wonder that folks that played pyramid complained about results (or rather lack of such)? How do they know how the method performs today? Because this method won some time ago it does not mean it is winning today.And that's the reasons I don't use paper-and-pencil methods. Too error-prone, often too much time consuming to compute and information they provide is often too limited to make them an effective playing tool. But that's just MHO.
AquariusCan you please elaborate more on this? Short explanations don't really help much.
-
https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/322830
Seems we may be trapped in a circular argument.
I seriously doubt that anyone will change the way they are doing things.
I'm a little surprised that some folks believe my grade school-level workout is too complex for average lottery gamblers.
The biggest problem is my inability to post samples of the tracking charts.
Trying to explain what I do with words apparently doesn't provide the clarity a newbie needs.
Sorry, but there is no way to solve this problem.
It's said that action speaks louder than words.
Effective Monday, I'm going to post some permutations for the Texas Daily 4, Day Draw (12:27 p.m.).
I recently won $290 in Pick 3.
I'm going to use the win to play 4 pick 4 permutations Monday through Saturday (see the link above)
I believe I have the time to log the results and make new choices for the next several weeks.
It may turn out be a bust, but, I'll certainly be entertained.
Thanks for your interest. -
Cool. I’ve been doing same thing for the past 3 weeks on the dream team thread. Every sunday post 14 numbers one for every draw pick3 game. I think first week there was one, and the next 2 there was 2 each with one straight 731. Only part that is trouble is the exact days matching so that change the bet structure , but still even one 50/50 and one 50 box is still profitable on paper with paper ...
Good luck to you bobby623.
Sometimes you do the right thing just because it’s right.
Life's a game of mathematics, if you can't figure that out I don't know what to tell you.
-
Quote: Originally posted by bobby623 on Sep 30, 2018
https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/322830
Seems we may be trapped in a circular argument.
I seriously doubt that anyone will change the way they are doing things.
I'm a little surprised that some folks believe my grade school-level workout is too complex for average lottery gamblers.
The biggest problem is my inability to post samples of the tracking charts.
Trying to explain what I do with words apparently doesn't provide the clarity a newbie needs.
Sorry, but there is no way to solve this problem.
It's said that action speaks louder than words.
Effective Monday, I'm going to post some permutations for the Texas Daily 4, Day Draw (12:27 p.m.).
I recently won $290 in Pick 3.
I'm going to use the win to play 4 pick 4 permutations Monday through Saturday (see the link above)
I believe I have the time to log the results and make new choices for the next several weeks.
It may turn out be a bust, but, I'll certainly be entertained.
Thanks for your interest.Just an observation; most of your threads get hijacked. Wonder why?
-
I didn’t mean to put that I thought I was putting it here when I looked I didn’t see it so I did it again but thought I was putting it on here in this. Anyways sorry, that’s okay maybe not a good start but in the start may be good to watch and see direction may not be as planned something else might come up, happens,but stick to the plan,, tbh I can’t even follow it but I like to follow things if I can. I usually twist them to mine etc,, ok but I would never hijack a fellow af man, well at least my gramdfatha was wwii,oops, jao .lol
Sometimes you do the right thing just because it’s right.
Life's a game of mathematics, if you can't figure that out I don't know what to tell you.
-
Quote: Originally posted by aquariuslottery on Sep 30, 2018
With all the respect, Bobby 623, I don't believe in paper-and-pencil methods for lotteries, particularly if they are as complex and labor intensive as yours.
The reason for this is such.
I do computer programming, although not for living but do monetize my creations.
Some time ago (perhaps 5 years) I was asked by a fellow from Europe (I don't know if he is a member of LP) to computerize a Pick 3 vertical positional skips chart that he put into a spreadsheet. It took me some time to understand his concepts of generating the results from the skips but once I got it running, from the beginning his manual results and mine computerized were at odds. He simply had manual computing errors which he never noticed although he was very diligent. His manual results made him assume that certain probabilities took place which, unfortunately, were only the results of errors. Ultimately, I found his concept of vertical skips an interesting approach for Pick 3 predictions, although it was too erratic to use on consistent basis, particularly for backtracking.
The problem is not that we make errors. The problem is that oftentimes we cannot see them even if we checked our data dozens of times. Happened to me before and not only once.
The second problem is that even one error in data may skew the prediction results for a long time. Accidentally introduce more errors and your results may be completely off (happened to me, too). Not to mention the amount of time required to do more complex computations (and yours seem to be such).
So if I see a system that is worth consideration I have to computerize it first. 3 reasons for that: 1) I reduce the data entry to only one point (the last draw) which is easy to verify (and I'm very strict in verifying the input so no garbage goes in), 2) computer does the computations very fast and efficiently and will never screw them up, and 3) this gives me an opportunity to backtrack instantly to see the past performance; my approach is to never play anything no matter how successful it is claimed to be if I cannot backtrack the claims' credibility. Not only this, I like to have an option for "what if" scenarios that may allow me to see what works and what doesn't at any given time. The need for "what if" scenarios was actually the main incentive that made me computerize my stuff - I tried manually and it took me half a day (and God only knows how accurate it was) to create one scenario compared with 0.5 sec with 100% accuracy for the computer. And I can test not only one but dozens of scenarios in minutes. No contest.
Although some computer gurus state that if you want things screwed up real good use a computer I believe they can be used for simplifying things as well. Why did they introduce computers in the first place? To make computing things easier.
Some more thoughts regarding "what if" scenarios.
You designed your system and refined its performance over the time, I assume. It seem to be working well for you. For me, no matter how successful my stuff is I always ask myself a question - is there anything better than this? I don't believe that there is one always-winning system for any lottery. Sometimes you take a system that generally shows a lousy performance, change a parameter or 2 in it and you may get totally different results.
An example that I'm tempted to explore in the future. The pyramid system based on draw date for Pick 3. As silly as it may appear (what the date has in common with number prediction?) but has anyone explored its effectiveness in "what if" scenarios? For how long should the numbers be played? One draw, 2 draws, 3, more than that? How long would it take to compute 30-day simulation for just one option? (and 30 days is the minimum I would consider). And how does the 1 day play compare with 2,3 etc. Which one is better at this given time (this may fluctuate even from day to day). Try to do this manually, good luck. But this is an essential information to know before making a decision what to play. Any wonder that folks that played pyramid complained about results (or rather lack of such)? How do they know how the method performs today? Because this method won some time ago it does not mean it is winning today.And that's the reasons I don't use paper-and-pencil methods. Too error-prone, often too much time consuming to compute and information they provide is often too limited to make them an effective playing tool. But that's just MHO.
AquariusWith all the respect, Bobby 623, I don't believe in paper-and-pencil methods for lotteries, particularly if they are as complex and labor intensive as yours.
The reason for this is such.The human brain is much more complex, sophisticated and functional than any computer! .The computer's calculating power is just mind boggling. The computer takes input from us, not the other way around. Try telling the device to proof why ncr = n! / r! * (n - r)!, it can't, but it can calculate any combination matrix for variables faster than any human brain! Does this make it smarter? No. What am trying to say is, you have to have an ideal, assumption, hypothesis in place, we seem to delegate these brain functions to the computer. Using pencil and pen or a computing device is not the issue here.
1.Pick 3 has a matrix of nPr = n!/(n-r)! n! (n=10, r=3)
2.A draw with digit replacement(digit can repeat)
3. Each drawn set is mutually exclusive
What is one's understanding of above matrix and it rules? You get this , then you crunch your data whether manually or device-based.
-
Quote: Originally posted by Soledad on Sep 30, 2018
I never get quoted,:(
NY DRAWS: August 17th midday to August 20th midday::::;
925+677+051+228+342+348+541=3112
3112 divided by 7 (the mean)=444
AUGUST 20th EVENING DRAW - 444...!
Dont ever talk to me about math.Unless you’re willing.
Not quite the math nor the application thereof I was thinking but, interesting nonetheless. So, have you discovered any consistency here that will keep you ahead in any way? Is it based on only four midday draws which produces a reasonably expected result on the corresponding 4th day evening draw? I think this theory can be tested and, for the record, I'm neither looking for a system nor trying to expose your approach here. However, you've provided what seems to be a given input for a given output application.
Small games, frequent wins, and regular payouts 'cause.....
There are seven days in the week...'Someday' isn't one of them.
#lotto-4-a-living
-
Just wanted to put my .05c in on this topic/debate, with reference to the "randomness" of things: i.e to say this: "Random makes predictabilty more possible". If the numbers generated were basically the same each time because they were "programmed", then this too would be predictable by virtue of the programming. For instance, in the case of the pick 3, if a program was in place that generated selected numbers to have the digit "7" in each play, then once that trend is noticed, it would be advantageous to simply play those numbers that contain the digit "7" for consistent wins.
By the same token if the number selection is random then the digit "7" will be selected sometimes but not every-time and therein is the basis of the predictability factor - simply determine, from watching the trend, how often that digit comes around and when it is "due" or "potent" as we say here - then you take your best shot at those numbers that have that digit in it within that "due" time-frame. There are other methods to break down the best selection of those numbers - but that is the simple basis for why I think that the mere fact of the very randomness of the game, makes it predictable.
Order vs. Chaos. Chaos disrupts order but is pulled back ultimately to the grand design of Order in a finite paradigm. That's my 05c on the issue.
Success is liking yourself, what you do and how you do it!
Psalm 122:6
-
Quote: Originally posted by One2win on Oct 6, 2018
Just wanted to put my .05c in on this topic/debate, with reference to the "randomness" of things: i.e to say this: "Random makes predictabilty more possible". If the numbers generated were basically the same each time because they were "programmed", then this too would be predictable by virtue of the programming. For instance, in the case of the pick 3, if a program was in place that generated selected numbers to have the digit "7" in each play, then once that trend is noticed, it would be advantageous to simply play those numbers that contain the digit "7" for consistent wins.
By the same token if the number selection is random then the digit "7" will be selected sometimes but not every-time and therein is the basis of the predictability factor - simply determine, from watching the trend, how often that digit comes around and when it is "due" or "potent" as we say here - then you take your best shot at those numbers that have that digit in it within that "due" time-frame. There are other methods to break down the best selection of those numbers - but that is the simple basis for why I think that the mere fact of the very randomness of the game, makes it predictable.
Order vs. Chaos. Chaos disrupts order but is pulled back ultimately to the grand design of Order in a finite paradigm. That's my 05c on the issue.
That's called the Gambler's Fallacy.
-
Quote: Originally posted by Lucky Loser on Oct 6, 2018
Not quite the math nor the application thereof I was thinking but, interesting nonetheless. So, have you discovered any consistency here that will keep you ahead in any way? Is it based on only four midday draws which produces a reasonably expected result on the corresponding 4th day evening draw? I think this theory can be tested and, for the record, I'm neither looking for a system nor trying to expose your approach here. However, you've provided what seems to be a given input for a given output application.
Yes and no. Re-categorizing? perhaps is the word ,after well there is some figuring that needs to be done. This is half the example I showed you of the whole thing. I like to use results with other things? perhaps could be anything really I just guess if something shows me something I follow it. Here like,
September 1 : 430,669,340,084,104,331,to 637 (7) add up to 2595/ 7=370. Add lotto math same 7, get 375. Add again 645. 406 next flip 0. But next 7, 669 to 406, same math is 367(hmm)+241=508. So that’s from the 4th evening.805 (reversed straight) showed 9/8 evening. 0 showed itself. Don’t sleep on reversed straights lol advice. Patterns I like patterns.
i have a page in the systems forum from a couple years ago, show this kind of stuff I do also with it.
Sometimes you do the right thing just because it’s right.
Life's a game of mathematics, if you can't figure that out I don't know what to tell you.
-
Call it what you will, Tucker Black - the $hit works sometimes, tends to work better with pairs than single digits, tho. Combining pairs and singles digits out gives you a little better odds in yr work-out.
Success is liking yourself, what you do and how you do it!
Psalm 122:6
