Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 6:10 pm
You last visited August 29, 2014, 6:07 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

emilyg's Blog

  • emilyg's Blog has 1,565 entries (0 private) and has been viewed 1,521,133 times.
  • Lottery Post members have made 4025 comments in emilyg's Blog.
  • emilyg is a Platinum member
emilyg's Premium Blog:  http://blogs.lotterypost.com/emilyg/

Today, 12:04 amObama...

Krauthammer On Obama's Foreign Policy: 'The Strategy Is To Do Absolutely Nothing'
8/28/2014, 11:16:04 PM � by Steelfish � 10 replies
FoxNews ^ | August 28, 2014
Krauthammer On Obama's Foreign Policy: 'The Strategy Is To Do Absolutely Nothing' August 28 Charles Krauthammer ripped President Obama's foreign policy Thursday on "Special Report with Bret Baier," blasting the president for holding a news conference at which he said, "we don't have a strategy yet" for dealing with ISIS in Syria. "The president of the United States, in the middle of a real crisis, a few days after the beheading of an American...gets in front of the world and says, I don't have a strategy," the syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor said. "If that is true, don't say...

Entry #1,565
View and Add Comments  (2 Comments)

Yesterday, 7:31 pmYou are a racist...

'm Andrew Klavan and this is the Revolting Truth.

Some of you may have noticed that our country is sharply divided along political lines.  To those of you who haven't noticed:  our country is sharply divided along political lines.  Approximately thirty eight percent of Americans identify themselves as conservative, twenty three percent identify themselves as liberal, while the remaining thirty nine percent can't identify themselves and are waiting for a policeman to take them home.

Those who identify as conservative generally believe in limited government, low taxes and close adherence to the constitution.  Those who identify as liberal generally believe that if they had a hammer, they'd hammer out justice all over the land, but since they don't, they'll just have another latte and feel good about themselves.

Can we bring these two sides closer together without using rope and a nail gun or would using rope and a nail gun actually be kind of a good time?

We here at the Revolting Truth believe that better communication is the road to better understanding which is the path to better relations which is the freeway to better homes and gardens which is the last stop before Tomorrowland.

And that's why today we'd like to present the first installment of the Leftese Dictionary - a glossary of left wing terms and their meanings which will help right wingers understand what the people who don't know what they're talking about are talking about.

Let's begin with a term Right Wingers hear a lot when chatting with Left Wingers:  "You are racist!"  The phrase "You are a racist!" or "That's racist," is leftese for "I have no logical arguments."  As an example of how the term is used in conversation, let's say you point out that under President Obama's left wing policies, the percentage of African American families living in poverty has increased and black participation in the labor force has decreased while under right wing President Reagan black unemployment plummeted, and the income gap between blacks and whites narrowed. That's when a left winger might respond by employing the phrase, "You are racist."

Leftists have many different ways of saying "I have no logical argument," for the same reason Eskimos have many different words for snow.  Another way a leftist may concede that his point of view is nonsense is by saying "I am offended."  If, for instance, you point out that the poverty rate for women has increased under President Obama and that women's earnings relative to men have declined, making this a dark economic time for women, a leftist might reply, "You said the word dark.  You are racist.  I am offended."

One other way a leftist might have of saying, "I have no logical argument," is "the science is settled."  If you point out that there is exactly zero real evidence that human actions threaten to cause catastrophic climate change, a leftist will reply, "The science is settled."  When you ask him what precise scientific facts he is talking about, he is likely to say, "I am offended.  You are racist."

Entry #1,564
View and Add Comments  (2 Comments)

August 25, 2014, 11:23 amObama and race...

Tim Stanley writes for The Telegraph that the White House will not be the driver behind the type of meaningful change in how the US deals with racism, inequality and violence. He says President Barack Obama has not claimed a meaningful leadership role within the country's racial narrative.

"He was never going to be someone who would confront racism head on or seek a substantial redistribution of power and money of the variety that many civil rights leaders feel is necessary to help the poor," he writes.

Entry #1,563
View and Add Comments  (2 Comments)

August 23, 2014, 9:53 pmMiss Kitty's prs. wk. 8-24

03  04  09

14  16

26  27

33  36  39


67  69


Entry #1,562

August 22, 2014, 11:12 pmFerguson and the Real Race War..


Entry #1,561
View and Add Comments  (2 Comments)

August 22, 2014, 12:35 pmNever Question a Drunk...

Never question a drunk
I was shopping at the local supermarket where I selected:
A half-gallon of 2% milk
A carton of eggs
A quart of orange juice
A head of lettuce
A 2 lb. Can of coffee
A 1 lb. Package of bacon

As I was unloading my items on the conveyor belt to check out, a drunk standing behind me watched as I placed the items in front of the cashier. While the cashier was ringing up the purchases, the drunk calmly Stated, 'You must be single.'

I was a bit startled by this proclamation, but I was intrigued by the derelict's intuition, since I indeed had never found Mr. Right.

I looked at the six items on the belt and saw nothing particularly unusual about my selections that could have tipped off the drunk to my marital status..

Curiosity getting the better of me, I said , 'Yes you are correct. But how on earth did you know that?'

The drunk replied, 'Cause you're ugly.

Entry #1,560
View and Add Comments  (3 Comments)

August 21, 2014, 11:23 pmFoley...

Wow: Senior intelligence officer says mission to save James Foley failed because of Obama
8/21/2014, 8:29:24 PM � by Beave Meister � 57 replies
Young Conservatives ^ | 8/21/2014 | Joshua Riddle
Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer (Ret.) is a CIA-trained former senior intelligence officer and he says that the rescue operation for American journalist James Foley wasn't successful because President Obama "dragged his feet". "Thursday morning, Shaffer appeared on WMAL radio in Washington, D.C., to discuss the ISIS execution of American journalist James Foley earlier this week. He told me and co-host Brian Wilson that the recently revealed rescue attempt led by Special Forces earlier this summer failed because President Obama was slow to give the go-ahead: I'm hearing from my friends in the Pentagon, they are giving him every single option...

Entry #1,559
View and Add Comments  (2 Comments)

August 21, 2014, 8:21 pmObama..

Obama Considering Granting 800K Guest-Worker Visas as 90% Believe American Workers Should Be Favored     

430 comments � 0 minutes ago

from Breitbart.com

Entry #1,558
View and Add Comments  (3 Comments)

August 18, 2014, 12:00 pmWhere are Sharpton and Jackson?

CHICAGO � Seven people have been killed and at least 29 others wounded in shootings across the city since Friday evening, police said.

Two people were killed and another wounded in what police said was a "domestic-related" shooting in Roseland late Sunday.

The shooting occurred about 9:55 p.m. in the 400 block of West 104th Street, police News Affairs Officer Amina Greer said, citing preliminary information.

Entry #1,557
View and Add Comments  (4 Comments)

August 17, 2014, 3:06 pmNew details on Ferguson...


Entry #1,556
View and Add Comments  (3 Comments)

August 16, 2014, 9:11 pmMiss Kitty's prs. wk 8-17

03  07

14  19

24   26

33  34  38

46  47  49

56  59

66     89     99

Entry #1,555

August 14, 2014, 11:20 amBest comeback line

Best comeback line

Police work can be entertaining as well as dangerous.    Recently, a female sheriff's deputy arrested Patrick Lawrence, a 22 year old white male, who was fornicating with a pumpkin in the middle of a field at night.

The next day, at the Gwinnett County (GA) courthouse, Lawrence was charged with lewd and lascivious behavior, public indecency and public intoxication.    The suspect explained that he was passing a pumpkin patch on his way home from a drinking session when he decided to stop.

'You know how a pumpkin is soft and squishy inside, and there was no one around for miles, or at least I thought there was no one around' he stated.    Lawrence went on to say that he pulled over to the side of the road, picked out a pumpkin that he felt was appropriate to his purpose, cut a hole in it, and proceeded to satisfy his pressing need.

'Guess I was really into it, y'know?' he commented with evident embarrassment.    In the process of doing the deed, Lawrence failed to notice an approaching sheriff's car and was unaware of his audience until Deputy Brenda Taylor approached him.

'It was an unusual situation, that's for sure,' said Deputy Taylor. 'I walked up to Lawrence and he's just humping away at this pumpkin.'    Deputy Taylor went on to describe what happened when she approached Lawrence ...

'I said: 'Excuse me sir, but do you realize that you're having sex with a pumpkin?'

He froze and was clearly very surprised that I was there, and then he looked me straight in the face and said:

'A pumpkin? <snip> ... is it midnight already?'

The court (and the judge) could not contain their laughter. Lawrence was found guilty only of public intoxication, fined $10. and sent on his way.    The Washington Post wrote an article describing this as "The best come-back line ever."

Entry #1,554
View and Add Comments  (3 Comments)

August 12, 2014, 10:22 pmObama...

Obama is beset by problems at home and abroad. Just 40 percent of voters approve of the way he's doing his job, tying his worst mark in three years and the second worst of his presidency.

Just 39 percent approve of the way he's dealing with the economy and only 33 percent approve of how he's dealing with foreign policy, the worst of his years in office.

By 42-32 percent, voters say their opinions of Obama make them more likely to vote this fall for a Republican than for a Democrat.

And for the first time this election cycle, more people said they'd vote for a Republican than a Democrat for Congress, by 43 percent to 38 percent.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/08/11/235995/obamas-standing-among-voters-is.html#storylink=cpy

Entry #1,553
View and Add Comments  (3 Comments)

August 9, 2014, 9:23 pmMiss Kitty's prs. wk 8-10


22  25  26  29 

35  38  39

44  45  46

56  58  59

68  69


Entry #1,552

August 9, 2014, 6:28 pmOur open borders...

Ebola could break into the United States through the unsecured U.S. border with Mexico, experts say.

"While we've seen no signs that Ebola virus has spread to our borders, it is very concerning," Rep. Randy Weber (R-TX) told Breitbart News. "The border has still not been secured, and the President continues to wave the sign that our borders are open. There is no telling what might eventually make its way into the heartland, which should be concerning to all."

Weber is a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee's subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights and International Organizations. That panel held a special hearing Thursday to examine the potential threat to the U.S. the African Ebola outbreak presents. During the hearing, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Tom Frieden downplayed the possibility Ebola could break into the U.S. via the Mexican border but did say that it is "inevitable" the U.S. would see some cases of the deadly virus though there wouldn't be a massive outbreak.

"It is certainly possible that we could have ill people in the US who develop Ebola after having been exposed elsewhere," Frieden testified. "But we are confident that there will not be a large Ebola outbreak in the US."

However, a senate aide told Breitbart News Friday that Congress is monitoring the border for a potential Ebola outbreak. "Committee staff are in regular contact with CDC, [Customs and Border Protection], and other agencies to monitor the Ebola virus outbreak in Western Africa," the Senate aide said. "Our porous southern border remains a major concern."

Dr. Jane Orient, the executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, said Americans should be concerned about this.

"It's a question for which there are many unknowns," Orient said in a phone interview. "We do know that people from affected areas of West Africa have been apprehended at the border in the last few years. I don't know how recently it's happened, and I don't know how quickly someone could get here from there�so I don't really know if there is any infected person who could survive long enough to cross the border, but the incubation period is as long as 21 days. Or if they are coming into Central America, then maybe they're exposing other people who are then taking it here from there. Once you have one infected person, you could have a whole series of other contacts and so on."

Orient said the risk of infectious disease spreading across the southern U.S. border is serious, adding that nefarious forces such as biological terrorists may try to exploit the virtually non-existent security along the U.S. border with Mexico to introduce a biological threat like Ebola into the United States.

"The point is we have thousands of people streaming across our southern border who have not been screened in any way for infectious disease, which would include Tuberculosis and a whole host of other things�not just Ebola," she said. "But if you did want to try to introduce Ebola into the United States, this is one mechanism you might try to use."

Shawn Moran, Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council, confirmed that "it's definitely a threat" and said "we're concerned with any type of infectious disease."

"Unfortunately, the only type of training we get is from CBP [Customs and Border Protection], and it's usually computer-based training and an hour in length," Moran said when reached by phone on Friday. "We've had it in the past on I believe Avian flu, H1N1, on some of the signs of what to look for�and they provided gloves and respirators�but that's about it in terms of preparation to deal with it."

Moran said that the southern border and the northern border of the U.S. "definitely still are weak spots" when it comes to the transportation of infectious disease into the United States.

"We're concerned about diseases coming across, we're concerned about threats to America, physical terrorist threats and things like that�but where we're focused on anti-terrorism. We're not really focused on biological threats," Moran said. "CBP could always do more to prepare to fight these things."

Orient said the outbreak of Ebola in West Africa right now is "massive, and it's horrible, and it's going to lead to just dire consequences, and it could travel here by a whole lot of means�probably most likely by someone who was on an international flight out of West Africa, either the person himself or someone who got infected from him, either way."

"Once you have an airplane that stops in West Africa, and then people transfer to other flights, it's a major nightmare to try to figure out who all the contacts were," Orient said.

"The border being insecure is a big threat of infectious disease getting into the United States, and I would think the worst threat from that standpoint is drug-resistant Tuberculosis," she said, adding that Ebola's most likely chances of getting into the U.S. would be "far and away" from an international flight.

Since the Ebola incubation period could be up to 21 days but is "probably more likely to be two weeks or less," Orient said "it's not impossible for someone to fly in from West Africa and get from Central America to the U.S. border within the incubation period. Maybe it's not likely, but I can't say that it's impossible."

Moran said that once people are leaving from Central America to head into the United States, "it really depends" how long it takes them to get to the U.S. border.

"It could be just a few days to over a month, depending on where you're coming from and what your resources are," Moran said. "The resources one is a big one. If you have the money, you could get here more quickly.

Moran added that people are coming from all over the world into the United States illegally. "We get people from all over," Moran said. "We don't discriminate, and we don't care where you're from. If you're here illegally we're going to arrest you and try to send you back. If you enter the U.S. illegally, the Border Patrol will arrest you�what happens after that is out of our control�but we're going to make that initial arrest, it doesn't matter if they're from England, Central America, Ireland, Russia�whatever. If you were born in a different country and you don't have papers to be here legally, you're going to be arrested."

"In any given month, you would probably find most of the countries on Earth represented in our arrest statistics," Moran added.

A document the United Nations released recently found that people from Asia, Africa, and other far-flung regions of the world are using the same weak southern U.S. border to enter the United States as Central American and Mexican people are using. The document found that the U.S. border with Mexico is a "global pathway" to the United States for illegal aliens from Africa and elsewhere around the world.

Another internal report that Breitbart Texas' Brandon Darby recently uncovered showed that at least 71 individuals from Ebola-affected countries have been caught illegally entering the U.S. or turned themselves in at the border between January and July 24.

"Among the significant revelations are that individuals from nations currently suffering from the world's largest Ebola outbreak have been caught attempting to sneak across the porous U.S. border into the interior of the United States," Darby wrote of the leaked CBP report. "At least 71 individuals from the three nations affected by the current Ebola outbreak have either turned themselves in or been caught attempting to illegally enter the U.S. by U.S. authorities between January 2014 and July 2014."

If an Ebola outbreak hit the United States, Orient said she doesn't "see any evidence we are prepared for this," adding that "we've really been in denial about the potential threat of big epidemics here, except influenza has been taken seriously. But the other big threat is of biological warfare, which of course has been a concern for decades�the United States has previously done defensive research and probably some offensive research as well, but I don't think it has taken seriously the possibility it could happen here. We certainly don't have very good quarantine or isolation facilities to handle it, and we have been focusing much of our research and surveillance on non-threats and not paying attention to potential extremists or people who could be a martyr who could come with infectious organisms rather than with explosives. I mean, you don't even actually have to be infected yourself�you could bring infected body fluids on an airplane or across the border, and the virus may survive in those fluids for a period of time, we're not sure how long."

"We need to understand that the United States has many enemies in the world right now, and there are many means of attacking us that, if they were successful, would be absolutely devastating," Orient added.

To stop an outbreak ahead of time, Orient said that "first we need to recognize the existence of the problem."

"People often say why worry about the illegal immigrants when it may come from legal immigrants who came here legally," Orient continued. "Certainly that's a good question, except with lawful people, the airplanes have a manifest, and they know who comes in. So identifying the people, knowing their destination, doing the contacting of them may be difficult but it's not impossible. With illegals, you have no idea who the people are, where they come from, what the state of their health is, or where they're going�that just magnifies the problem many-fold. There are many ways of screening people if they come through Customs�there are visual screenings of if they look sick, there are monitors that can check body temperature remotely where you don't have to stick a thermometer in somebody's mouth, and that's been used at least in some foreign countries to keep people who may be in early stages of influenza from boarding an aircraft. Or you could do what we used to do for decades, which is quarantine all new legal immigrants into the country for a period of time that's thought to be necessary to see if they're incubating a deadly disease. If there's an Ebola threat, then there would be a difference based on what disease is out there and where people are coming from. None of these are perfect, but at least they give us a chance of identifying potential threats without preventing people from coming into the U.S. when it is appropriate for them to come here."

Entry #1,551
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)
Previous Page  Page  of 105  Next Page