Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 12:57 am
You last visited March 6, 2015, 12:53 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

CajunWin4's Blog

  • CajunWin4's Blog has 791 entries (0 private) and has been viewed 522,962 times.
  • Lottery Post members have made 1080 comments in CajunWin4's Blog.
  • CajunWin4 is a Standard member

March 3, 2015, 9:29 pmFLAT BUSTED: Hillary Clinton's Criminal Activities Must Disqualify her from the Presidency

FLAT BUSTED: Hillary Clinton's Criminal Activities Must Disqualify her from the Presidency

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

 

Scandal: The former secretary of state's use of a personal account to exclusively conduct government business and to protect her political future in violation of the law ought to disqualify her from the presidency.

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cDovLzIuYnAuYmxvZ3Nwb3QuY29tLy1iQVptcU5UUFBHYy9VMkJWZmdkMWF1SS9BQUFBQUFBQlZsMC9zQVNZRGFYbHQwVS9zMzYwLzE0MDQyOS1oaWxsYXJ5LWJlbmdoYXppLWNvZmZpbnMuanBn'Witch hunts” sometimes find a witch, and those who dismissed the establishment of the House Benghazi Select Committee, chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., as just another witch hunt are eating their words.

The existence of a personal account that Hillary Clinton used to conduct government business as secretary of state was discovered by the committee and reported by the New York Times.

Clinton's use of this personal account explains why investigations of the Benghazi terrorist attack — and her culpability in our diplomatic mission's vulnerability there, the failure to heed warnings and the cover-up afterward — failed to find much email evidence of her direct involvement.

According to the Times, Clinton never used her official government email account at all. What's more, she used exclusively one set up on the day of her Senate confirmation as secretary of state. This indicates premeditation in an attempt to deceive the American people by someone determined to fulfill her ambition to be the first woman to sit in the Oval Office.

The Times said that Clinton's aides made no attempt to systematically preserve her emails on government servers as required by the Federal Records Act. Team Hillary is now trying to use the excuse that they thought their government recipients would archive the emails and that was thought to be good enough.

Instead, Clinton's aides carefully culled the emails to find which ones contained no information damaging to her political future, and only these would be turned over to the State Department to be archived.

 

Jason Baron, a former director of litigation at the National Archives, told the Times that it was “very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business.”

Actually, we can conceive of such a scenario — a presidential wannabe determined not to leave a potentially campaign-ending paper trail.

Though Benghazi occurred after the account was set up, the account fulfilled its predefined purpose and served to hide a paper trail documenting her malfeasance in office and deadly incompetence.

We know from others that warnings of the Benghazi terrorist attack came to her office along with warnings of the Benghazi mission's lack of security as it told of a surrounding sea of terrorist training camps.

We know that Clinton was an architect of the video lie that she repeated to the parents of the Benghazi dead as she stood in front of their sons' caskets.

These private emails may contain a centipede's worth of shoes ready to drop, things such as her role in concocting the video lie and her responsibility for ignoring warnings of a terrorist attack that killed the first U.S. ambassador assassinated in three decades, Christopher Stevens, as well as Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods.

Use of government email accounts is required as a security measure. Archiving of emails by officials conducting government business is required to preserve contemporaneous communications without officials being able to “sanitize” them later.

Clinton may claim, like her IRS counterparts and President Obama, that there is not even a “smidgeon of corruption” in all of this. But as even MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell had to say that her actions are “a stunning breach of security.” CNN's Chris Cuomo added that this “smells terrible.”

It is the stench of corruption and a reason why Hillary Clinton must testify before the Select Committee — and why she is unfit to be president of the United States.


Source: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2015/03/flat-busted-hillary-clintons-lawless.html
Entry #791
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

March 3, 2015, 11:59 amThe List of Domestic Enemies in Congress

The List of Domestic Enemies in Congress

Tuesday, March 3, 2015 6

The list of congressmen and women who have chosen not to attend PM Netanyahu’s speech today is shown below. This is not a display of displeasure against Israel or the prime minister: it is a show of support for a dictator. Those who stand with a dictator instead of representing the people who elected them are domestic enemies. Do not forget this list. Or what they represent. North Carolina has two enemies on this list: Butterfield and Price.

David Price has a long history in Congress and his chains in the afterlife continue to grow. As do our chains in this country.

David DeGerolamo

SENATE

Sen. Al Franken (D., Minn.)

Sen. Tim Kaine (D., Va.)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.)

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.)

Sen. Brian Schatz (D., Hawaii)

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D., N.M.)

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.)

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.)

HOUSE

Rep. Karen Bass (D., Calif.)

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D., Ore.)

Rep. Corrine Brown (D., Fla.)

Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D., N.C.)

Rep. Lois Capps (D., Calif.)

Rep. Andre Carson (D., Ind.)

Rep. Katherine Clark (D., Mass.)

Rep. Lacy Clay (D., Mo.)

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D., Mo.)

Rep. James Clyburn (D., S.C.)

Rep. Steve Cohen (D., Tenn.)

Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D., N.J.)

Rep. John Conyers (D., Mich.)

Rep. Danny Davis (D., Ill.)

Rep. Peter DeFazio (D., Ore.)

Rep. Diana DeGette (D., Colo.)

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D., Texas)

Rep. Donna Edwards (D., Md.)

Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.)

Rep. Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.)

Rep. Marcia Fudge (D., Ohio)

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D., Ariz.)

Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D., Ill.)

Rep. Denny Heck (D., Wash.)

Rep. Ruben Hinojosa (D., Texas)

Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D., Texas)

Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D., Ohio) 

Rep. Rick Larsen (D., Wash.)

Rep. Barbara Lee (D., Calif.)

Rep. John Lewis (D., Ga.)

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D., Calif.)

Rep. Betty McCollum (D., Minn.):

Rep. Jim McDermott (D., Wash.)

Reps. Jim McGovern (D., Mass.)

Rep. Jerry McNerney (D., Calif.)

Rep. Gregory Meeks (D., N.Y.)

Rep. Gwen Moore (D., Wis.)

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D., D.C.)

Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D., Texas)

Rep. Chellie Pingree (D., Maine)

Rep. David Price (D., N.C.)

Rep. Charles Rangel (D., N.Y.)

Rep. Cedric Richmond (D., La.)

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D., Ill.)

Rep. Bennie Thompson (D., Miss.)

Rep. Mike Thompson (D., Calif.)

Rep. John Yarmuth (D., Ky.)

Entry #790
View and Add Comments  (1 Comment)

February 28, 2015, 4:41 pmUncovered Muslim Brotherhood Documents Could Put Obama in Prison

Uncovered Muslim Brotherhood Documents Could Put Obama in Prison

Saturday, February 28, 2015

THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG!

IT’S NOT JUST “FRINGE MEDIA” TALKING ABOUT IT!

Last week I posted an article titled: OBAMA AND HILLARY CHARGED WITH AIDING AND ABETTING TERRORISTS because even though the Democrats here in our Congress refuse to acknowledge the NUMEROUS  acts of TREASON committed by Obama, despite being thousands of miles away, even our ALLY the Egyptians can see them as plain as day! I won’t get into it here, but there have been no less than two to three DOZEN articles over the last few years tying Obama to the Muslim Brotherhood and acts of Treason. THIS however, is far more than an article on some “Tea-Baggers” website we’re talking about. This is an ALLY of the United States CHARGING OBAMA AND HILLARY with crimes that come with a potential DEATH SENTENCE! 

Do I expect the Egyptians to try and imprison Obama? No… but I DO think it will bring more attention to what happened, and eventually someone is going to take him down. I stick by my prediction the week Benghazi happened. Benghazi WILL be what takes down Obama, it WILL be Trey Gowdy who does it, but Obama NEVER face justice. He’s a coward. In the end, if the heats gets to be too much, he’ll flee.  Below is the section of the Constitution dealing with Treason:

ARTICLE III, SECTION 3:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.”

IT’S GREAT TO SEE A FIGURE LIKE JUDGE JEANINE CALL ATTENTION TO SUCH A MAJOR ISSUE AS OBAMA USING BENGHAZI TO COVER UP AN ILLEGAL ARMS SHIPMENT TO THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD!

AS FAR AS I’M CONCERNED: 

SOMEONE SAVE ME A FRONT SEAT IN THE GALLOWS!

Awe, I’m sorry… does that sound cold of me? Let me put that in in a different context: How many MILLIONS of families are in poverty on Food Stamps now because Obama wanted more democratic voters dependent on the system? Picture what dinner is like in a house like that… or worse… Christmas for young kids… I have ZERO sympathy for what happens to Obama. ZERO. 

I have more respect for pocket lint, than I do for Obama. His OWN STATE DEPARTMENT UNDER HILLARY CLINTON CAME TO THE CONCLUSIONS THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE WAS THE SAFEST FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, PUT THE COUNTRY ON THE PATH TO ENERGY INDEPENDENCE, AND CREATED THOUSANDS OF JOBS. Obama still vetoes it. There is only ONE reason that lowlife in the Oval Office will not approve it: POLITICS. He could care less about the people of this country. PERIOD. 

As for Benghazi, In my post last week I asked some of the following questions: Do you think this was the 400 STINGER MISSILES THAT WERE BEING ILLEGALLY FUNNELED TROUGH THE LIBYAN EMBASSY THE NIGHT OF BENGHAZI that ultimately resulted in Christopher Stevens being killed when he was hung out to dry? Or do you think it might be because those same STINGER MISSILES WERE USED TO SHOOT DOWN AN AMERICAN HELICOPTER?

No… wait… maybe it was aiding and abetting the enemy by GUTTING our military on a STALIN LIKE PURGE OF ITS BEST AND HIGHEST RANKED OFFICERS! Could that be it? Wait, wait, let’s not forget the recent article by Michael Connelly, Constitutional Attorney who wrote about SIXTEEN EXAMPLES OF OBAMA AIDING AND ABETTING THE ENEMY! Of course, they might be referring to ADMIRAL LYONS WHO HAS REPEATEDLY SAID OBAMA CONSPIRED WITH THE ENEMY IN AN ACT OF TREASON! Maybe that’s it. 

FOR ARTICLES BY CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR MICHAEL CONNELLLY:

FAR TOO MUCH EVIDENCE HAS COME NOW TO COVER IT UP! WE KNOWBEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, OBAMA AND HILLARY RAN AN ILLEGAL GUN-RUNNING OPERATION IN LIBYA!

Townhall Reports Now, Clinton is denying even knowing about the program, although the evidence indicates it was largely her idea. Of course everything happened under Obama’s watch and the buck stops with him. The story of Obama’s gun-running program in Benghazi is long and multifarious, so I will break down the timeline for you:

May 26, 2012: Stevens arrives in Tripoli, the capitol city of Libya and sets up camp at the U.S. embassy.

Last summer, Clinton first proposed a plan to then-CIA Director David Petraeus to partner on a gun-trafficking program to arm the Syrian resistance and “vet the rebel groups, and train fighters who would be supplied with weapons,” according to The New York Times.

June of 2012: The New York Times reports that the CIA is operating a secret arms transfer program that sounds exactly like the plan Clinton developed with Petraeus. Suddenly, there is: “…an influx of weapons and ammunition to the rebels.”

September 5, 2012: A Libyan ship called Al Entisar (“The Victory”) docks in the Turkish port of Iskenderun, carrying 400 tons of cargo including many weapons such as rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) and shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles (MANPADS) destined for Syrian rebels 35 miles away from Iskenderun. The ship’s captain told the Times of London that the Muslim Brotherhood and the free Syrian Army broke into a fight over the arms.

September 10, 2012: Stevens arrives in Benghazi, Libya, the location of the U.S. consulate. About a mile away from the consulate, is the CIA annex. Stevens planned to stay at the consulate for five days. His visit was supposed to be secret, but Libya-based extremists somehow learned of his arrival.

September 11, 2012: Stevens has an unusual meeting with Turkish diplomat Consul General Ali Sait Akin. Fox News reported that the meeting was “…to negotiate a weapons transfer, an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham confirmed on Fox News Channel’s “Special Report with Bret Baier” that Stevens was in Libya to specifically control a situation: “…where the action was regarding the rising Islamic extremists who were trying to get their hands on weapons that were flowing freely in Libya…”

9:40 p.m. (Libya time): Libyan rebels launched and organized an armed attack against the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

10:04 p.m. CIA base chief at the nearby CIA annex calls for help including 50-caliber machine guns and vehicles from the Libyan intelligence, the 17 February Brigade and other Libyan militias. After 24 minutes of calls and no response, the CIA base chief takes a small team of seven people to the consulate. They were too late to save Stevens, but were able to save some State Department personnel.

11:56 p.m. CIA officers and the State Department members are seeking safety back at the CIA annex. There, rebels attack them with rocket-propelled grenades. Fighting continues on until 5:26 a.m.

6:00 a.m. Libyan forces suddenly arrive to “aid” the American team with 50 vehicles.

It is odd that the annex was attacked with same sort of weapons on the Libyan ship and that Stevens was reportedly in Benghazi to manage some sort of arms transfer.

Sen. Rand Paul said on Aaron Klein Radio:“First of all with regard to Benghazi, I think it’s important [to determine more about the apparent gun-running program] because it may have something to do with why the compound was attacked. If we were involved with shipping guns to Turkey, there was a report that a ship left from Libya towards Turkey and that there were arms on it in the week preceding this [attack]; there were reports that our ambassador was meeting with the Turkish attaché, so I think with regards to figuring out what happened at Benghazi, it’s very important to know whether or not the CIA annex had anything to do with facilitating guns being sent to Turkey and ultimately to Syria.

With regard to arming the rebels, just this week in the armed services committee, General Dempsey, the [Chairman of the] Joint Chiefs of Staff said that we were no longer able to distinguish who the good guys were from the bad guys and that sounds pretty worrisome if we are actually arming people who in the end may be enemies of America…enemies of Israel… enemies maybe of the Christians who live within Syria…sending arms to a rebel force to that may include Al-Nusra and other radical jihadists.”

OUR FELLOW COUNTRYMEN DIED, AS A RESULT OF AN ILLEGAL OPERATION BY OBAMA AND HILLARY.

THEY HAVE NO HONOR, NO PRIDE, & NO SOUL. MAY THEY ROT IN HELL!

 

In early 2012, Muslim Brotherhood presidential candidate Mohammed Morsi pranced around Egypt proclaiming “Jihad is our path,” and thought there was nothing better than to die in the cause of Allah—that is, the exact language used by terrorists!

Despite this, Barack Obama gushed on national television after Morsi was elected President of Egypt. And oddly—or not so oddly—Obama continued to gush over Morsi while reports surfaced that the Muslim Brotherhood were setting up torture chambers for their political enemies, not to mention openly crucifying Christians!

When Morsi was deposed, the Egyptian military discovered a treasure trove of documents linking the Obama regime with the illegal activities of the Muslim Brotherhood.

One such document is a list of Muslim Brotherhood officials receiving secret bribes in U.S. currency, paid out by the U.S. consulate, amounting to millions of dollars.

Investigative journalist Jerome Corsi has obtained a copy of the document held by the Egyptian military, proving the Obama regime sent millions of dollars in bribes to the Muslim Brotherhood.

But who was managing all of this money? Did the Muslim Brotherhood walk around with hundreds of thousands of dollars in their pockets?

Enter Malik Obama, Obama’s half brother. According to Egyptian television, citing the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt:

The President’s brother…is one of the architects of the major investments of the Muslim Brotherhood.

We’re not just talking about the bribes the Muslim Brotherhood received in Egypt, but the entire Muslim Brotherhood finances—worldwide—that more than likely included an astounding $8 billion dollar bribeto the Muslim Brotherhood made by the Obama regime. The bribe was payment to guarantee that the huge tract of Egyptian land, the Sinai Peninsula, be turned over to the Muslim Brotherhood sister group Hamas, undoubtedly to put Israel in an indefensible position. The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas mince no words about their goals for Israel: total annihilation.

According to Egypt Daily News, a document exists showing the eight billion dollar  “holocaust” agreement with the Obama administration that was signed by former Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi and his second in command Khairat Al-Shater, both under arrest by the Egyptian military for murder and treason.

Does this document really exist, showing the $8 billion dollar bribe signed by Obama or one of his representatives?

UNDOUBTEDLY!

According to Khairat Al-Shater’s son, Saad Al-Shater, prior to being arrested by the Egyptian military, his father was in possession of information linking Obama with the Muslim Brotherhood THAT HE SAYS WOULD PUT OBAMA IN PRISON!

As reported by a multitude of Arabic news sources:

In an interview with the Anatolia News Agency, Saad Al-Shater, the son of a Muslim Brotherhood leader, the detained Khairat Al-Shater said that his father had in his hand evidence that WILL LAND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, OBAMA, IN PRISON!

If the Egyptian military releases this document, it would no doubt spell the end of the Obama presidency, bringing impeachment, a long prison term, and PERHAPS EVEN THE DEATH PENALTY!

THAT’S AN ALLY TALKING!

THE DAMAGE DONE BY OBAMA WILL TAKE GENERATIONS TO UNDUE IF IT CAN BE UNDONE AT ALL… AND THERE ARE 300 MILLION AMERICANS. 

OBAMA’S SELFISH AGENDA HAS HARMED MILLIONS OF LIVES…

AND I HOPE HE GETS THE JUSTICE HE DESERVES!

Read the article for Center for Western Journalism:

 

THE VOICE OF REASON

Trey Gowdy

FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF MY BENGHAZI POSTS:

Treason 4

FOR MORE ON ALL OBAMA’S TREASONOUS ACTS!

Treason 6

FOR MORE OF CAPTAIN DIPLOMACY’S SUCCESS STORIES ON THE WORLD STAGE:

Entry #789
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

February 28, 2015, 1:32 pmNorway Just Deported 824 Muslims, Every American Needs To See What Happened Next ... includes (The S

Norway Just Deported 824 Muslims, Every American Needs To See What Happened Next … includes (The STAND)

Saturday, February 28, 2015

Norway recently made the controversial decision to deport a large amount of Muslims with ties to radical groups.

 

Despite all the liberals in Norway deeming this “racist”, the logical party went ahead with it and the result almost shut down every opposing voice in the government instantly. This is one of the best stories we have eve seen come from such a liberal area of the world.

Violent Crime Dropped By 30%

police_special

That’s right, whopping 30%, and it’s all because a couple of politicians decided to enforce the laws that they already had. What a world we live in where that is a shocking thing to do in a government.

Norwegian authority claims that 824 people were deported in October, for such a small country, that’s a record breaking number. The authorities attributed the change to “portfolio priorities” which have essentially made it easier to deport people back to Nigeria & Afghanistan.

121460-sydney-riot.gif

While most Americans and Europeans would call this unfair to target a certain race or religion, we tend to lean on the side that does anything possible to stop evil from creeping in our backyards.

VIA…

http://qpolitical.com/norway-just-deported-824-muslims-every-american-needs-to-see-what-happened-next/

 

Ovomit and the heffers would like to remind you At This Time …We won’t win this War on Terror by killing the enemy . Do not offend their gentle sensibilities As they are easily offended thin skinned, thick skulled Child raping muslim scum and deserve every opportunity to Come to Our Shores in peace and kumbaya ….. ohhh hell never mind- GO. KILL EAT.

 

Saudi Arabia: Beheading Bible Smugglers?

 

As is—or should be—well known by now, wherever Islam has sway, the advertisement of any other faith or creed becomes forbidden, for fear of “completion.”  Accordingly, reports indicate that close U.S. friend-and-ally Saudi Arabia—the birthplace of Islam where not one single church is allowed to exist—has now decreed the death penalty for anyone caught trying to smuggle Bibles or any other “publications that have prejudice to any other religious belief other than Islam.” The Christian Post reports:

The Saudi Arabian government has reportedly passed a law that imposes the death penalty on people caught smuggling Bibles into the majority-Muslim country

 

more here ..

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/muslim-persecution-of-christians/saudi-arabia-beheading-bible-smugglers/

 

 

And Obama is bring hundreds of thousands of muslims to America- Where the Bible is already under assault by the dhimmicrats, monkeys and Homo’s. America Do We really need more God hater’s, Islam devil worshippers in America? – NO! Deport the sharia whiners out of the USA to the muslim country of their choice.

 

Have you seen this Video of mine -https://vimeo.com/69865940
 
 
 
 
 
(From my facebook ) someone reported the former post as offensive well- if beheaded children offend you- get off my friend list-because instead of getting offended it should make you want to protect and defend the children from this… then you certainly have NO FREAKING BUSINESS as my friend anyway please delete yourself- coward.

 

 

Forever Living to Set you Free. From your life of misery. USMC

 

/prophecy/2014/08/song-of-songs-which-is-solomons-the-god-of-israel-is-real-picture-album-2464206.html

Entry #788
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

February 27, 2015, 6:39 pmMessage to America's Generals!

Message to America’s Generals!

Thursday, February 26, 2015

 OK, time for me to open my big mouth again! Someone needs to send a message to them, so it may as well be me… Who is them? Our military leaders, the Generals in Washington, D.C. advising President Obama. I hope everyone will share this and spread the message far and wide, because if things do not change soon, God only knows if America will ever recover from the mistakes being made by this administration…

So, I open up my Facebook timeline this afternoon and see a big headline to a story that reads “And Now Another Top Pentagon Official Has Just Spoken Out Strongly Against Obama Policy.”  This follows a story that was published about Marine Corps General John Kelly, head of the U.S. Southern Command, making some public statements contrary to the BS Obama is selling the American public. Before I rip into them, let’s not forget General Dempsey and his perceived push back against the White House.

Pay attention Generals! America needs you NOW! I don’t know what has happened to men in recent years, but none of you are spring chicken’s and surely remember a time when men had balls and didn’t mince their words. A time when a man’s yes meant YES and no meant NO! You are not men who were elected into your positions, you are, or should be men with demonstrated leadership abilities with a career history of proven ability to get a job done.

If Obama wants to surround himself with yes men, let him… And of course he has hired many of them. Let those that he hired kiss his backside and make him feel good at the end of the day, America needs YOU to speak truthfully and firmly! I understand that Obama is your Commander-in-Chief and that you have to extend a certain degree of respect to him, but being honest – with any man – is not disrespectful.

I laugh when I hear the media making a big deal about General Dempsey, or General Kelly defying the White House because they made lame statements going against Obama’s insistence that there will be no boots on the ground in Iraq. Since when does “maybe” and “it could be” preface any statement a man would consider strong?

It’s time that you follow those who preceded you and have retired and start pounding your fist on the desk and clearly stating to your Commander-in-Chief that we can NOT defeat ISIS without American boots on the ground! You have the support of the American people! I know no one with any military experience, nor have I spoken to anyone with any military experience, that believes the air strikes alone are going to achieve our goal and defeat ISIS.

You know we need boots on the ground and it’s time that you made it clearly known! Most of you have 35 to 40 years plus of military service… What are you afraid of? Surely you would rather be forced to retire than betray the American people and surrender your integrity and honor to the politically correct…

While your Commander-in-Chief and all of his minions are appearing on talk shows, bragging about the great coalition they have assembled, assuring everyone they are working on figuring this or that problem out, thousands of people are being killed, women and children raped, American’s beheaded, it’s atrocity after atrocity and nothing of any real substance is being done!

I am pleading with you and encouraging you to remember why you put that uniform on early in your career… It’s time that you reached down deep within and found your voice again! The American people rely on their military leaders to make the difficult decisions… The American people do not expect political correctness from this countries war fighters… PLEASE, it’s time to speak up and let Obama know what is necessary to deal with ISIS! It’s time you speak up and prevent our military from being torn apart… It’s time you speak up!

SemperFi

VIA…

http://universalfreepress.com/message-to-americas-generals/#

Entry #787
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

February 26, 2015, 5:03 pmEmails prove Hillary 'terror' lie in Benghazi Clinton claimed 'response to inflammatory material po

Emails prove Hillary 'terror' lie in Benghazi

Clinton claimed 'response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet'


  • Text Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

WASHINGTON – State Department emails released through a lawsuit by Judicial Watch show then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knew while the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi was under way that it was being carried out by terrorists.

Clinton blamed the attack on “rage and violence over an awful Internet video” when she spoke at a ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base on Sept. 14, 2014, as the remains of the four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were returned to the United States.

The emails were made public Thursday by the Washington, D.C., legal watchdog group.

“These emails leave no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s closest advisers knew the truth about the Benghazi attack from almost the moment it happened,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“And it is inescapable that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly lied when she planted the false story about ‘inflammatory material being posted on the Internet,’” Fitton said.

He said the “contempt for the public’s right to know is evidenced not only in these documents, but also in the fact that we had to file a lawsuit in federal court to obtain them.”

“The Obama gang’s cover-up continues to unravel, despite its unlawful secrecy and continued slow-rolling of information,” Fitton said. “Congress, if it ever decides to do its job, cannot act soon enough to put Hillary Clinton, Cheryl Mills and every other official in these emails under oath.”

Fitton criticized the current House Select Committee investigation on Benghazi headed by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R- S.C.

“Never once has Gowdy or the House Select Committee asked Judicial Watch to turn over the many bombshell documents Judicial Watch has obtained from the Obama administration by FOIA request, “ Fitton told WND.

“I would have thought a serious congressional investigation into Benghazi would have started with the documents we had, since Judicial Watch has led in exposing the White House cover-up,” he said.

On Sept. 11, 2012, at 4:07 p.m. Eastern Time, as the Benghazi attack was going on, Maria Sand, then a special assistant to Clinton, forwarded an email from the State Department’s Operations Center titled “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi is Under Attack,” to Cheryl Mills, then chief-of staff to Secretary Clinton, as well as Jacob Sullivan, then-deputy chief-of-staff for policy, Joseph McManus, then-Hillary Clinton’s executive assistance, and other special assistants in Clinton’s office.

The email read:

The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM [Chief of Mission] personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.

Then, at 4:38 p.m. Eastern, State Department Foreign Service Officer Lawrence Randolph forwarded Mills, Sullivan and McManus an email from Scott Bultrowicz, the former director of the Diplomatic Security Service, one of four senior State Department officials who was ousted in December 2012 after the publication of the State Department’s Advisor Review Board final report of the Benghazi attack.

With the subject line “Attack on Benghazi,” it read:

DSCC [Diplomatic Security Command Center] received a phone call from [REDACTED] in Benghazi, Libya initially stating that 15 armed individuals were attacking the compound and trying to gain entrance. The Ambassador is present in Benghazi and currently is barricaded within the compound. There are no injuries at this time and it is unknown what the intent of the attackers is. At approximately 1600 DSCC received word from Benghazi that individuals had entered the compound. At 1614 RSO advised the Libyans had set fire to various buildings in the area, possibly the building that houses the Ambassador [REDACTED] is responding and taking fire.

Nearly seven hours later, at 12:04 a.m. on Sept. 12, Randolph sent an email with the subject line “FW: Update 3: Benghazi Shelter Location “Also Under Attack,” to Mills, Sullivan and McManus that had several updates about the Benghazi attack:

I just called Ops and they said the DS command center is reporting that the compound is under attack again. I am about to reach out to the DS Command Center.

The email also contains a chain of earlier email updates:

Sept. 11, 2012, at 11:57 p.m. Eastern. Email: “(SBU) DS Command reports the current shelter location for COM personnel in Benghazi is under mortar fire. There are reports of injuries to COM staff.”

Sept. 11, 2012, 6:06 p.m. Eastern. (Subject: “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU): “(SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and call for an attack on Embassy Tripoli”

Sept. 11, 2012, 4:54 p.m. Eastern: “Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site to locate COM personnel.”

The State Department emails released Thursday by Judicial Watch reveal the first official confirmation of the death of Ambassador Stevens.

On Sept. 12, 2012, at 3:22 a.m. Eastern, Senior Watch Officer Andrew Veprek forwarded an email to numerous State Department officials, which was later forwarded to Mills and McManus, with the subject line “Death of Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi.”

It read:

Embassy Tripoli confirms the death of Ambassador John C. (Chris) Stevens in Benghazi. His body has been recovered and is at the airport in Benghazi.

Two hours later, McManus forwarded the news of Ambassador Stevens’ death to officials in the State Department Legislative Affairs office with instructions not to “forward to anyone at this point.”

Despite her three top staff members being informed that a terrorist group had claimed credit for the attack, Clinton, issued an official statement, also produced to Judicial Watch, claiming the attack may have been “a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/hillary-knew-emails-during-benghazi-attack-reported-terrorism/#RJ9AgKKPjTgVve57.99
Entry #786
View and Add Comments  (1 Comment)

February 24, 2015, 9:01 pmObama's Pentagon Infected With Jihadi Fervor? NO! It's Infected With OBAMA!

Obama’s Pentagon Infected With Jihadi Fervor? NO! It’s Infected With OBAMA!

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

 

WOAH, WOAH, WOAH! SLOW YOUR ROLL TURBO!

THE PENTAGON ISN’T INFECTED WITH JIHADI FERVOR!NO!

THE PENTAGON IS INFECTED WITH OBAMA’S TREASONOUS @SS!

Evil Within

 

HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO ASK?

WHEN DO WE OWN UP TO WHAT WE’VE DONE?

In a post dated June 20th titled:  OBAMA MUST BE ARRESTED & PROSECUTED FOR IMPERSONATING A PUBLIC OFFICER, the author goes into  GREAT detail about Barack Obama’s status as a  USURPER of the Presidency. As such, the author tells us Obama  CANNOT be impeached, because only a Lawful President can be Impeached. Obama was  NEVER qualified for the office of the President of the United States. Rather, Obama hijacked it. He is an  IMPOSTOR…  a charlatan. Even  OBAMA HIMSELF ADMITS THAT HE WAS BORN IN KENYA, but we’re long passed the point of being able to do anything about it. 

In 1979, an article was uncovered  WRITTEN BY VALERIE JARRETT’S FATHER-IN-LAW ABOUT A MUSLIM PLAN TO PURCHASE THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES.  If you  READ that  HORRIBLY disturbing article (that was written decades ago (and  LONG before the years of the Obama Debacle), does the claim by an Iranian Commander that  THE WHITE HOUSE IS ISIS HEADQUARTERS  really  seem  THAT outlandish?

Perhaps that alone isn’t enough. What about the  OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DOING NOTHING TO STOP KNOWN JIHAD TRAINING CAMPS right here in the United States? What about  FORMER CIA AGENTS COMING OUT AND SAYING OBAMA IS A “RADICAL ISLAMIST” AND ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES?

We have  FOUR STAR ADMIRALS WHO HAVE SAID OBAMA HAS CONSPIRED WITH THE ENEMY, other members of the  CIA CONFIRM OUR WORST FEARS ABOUT BARACK OBAMA, and  OBAMA’S INSISTENCE THAT AMERICAN SOLDIERS BE WILLING TO FIRE ON AMERICANS… does any of that concern you? Even the  NEW ARMY MANUAL DETAILS THE USE OF LETHAL FORCE ON U.S. CITIZENS EVEN THOSE PEACEFULLY PROTESTING!

 

WHEN DO WE REALLY FACE THE FACTS OF WHAT WE’VE DONE?

WHEN DO AMERICANS TAKE OWNERSHIP OF OUR MISTAKE?

READ WHAT SENIOR CHIEF ROSS WRITES ABOUT OBAMA’S SEALED PAST!

MOST VALUABLE PART OF THE POST IS ALWAYS THE LINKS AT THE END!

 

Dempsy

ONCEa nation’s military command is co-opted with anti-nationalist jihadi fervor, it follows (at least it should) that the country is in grave peril.

SO the fact that Obama’s Pentagon has gone over to the Islamic side, well, the fiery depths of hell are not too far behind.

ASSUREDLY, Obama Inc.’s high command demonstrated signs of betrayal at several junctures. However, they are now OPENLYgiving the heads up to ISIS (and their allies) as to their war plans, and herein lies the escalation. O M G!

Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

THE “enemy within” is hardly a new phenomenon. Not only isn’t it new, but it has deep roots in the Old Testament. As such, when Jewish self-haters lend succor to the enemy, those whose fervent desire is to destroy Israel, in actuality, their goal is to destroy Judaism. For this “distinction” they are termed Amalekites.

The descendants of Amalek described in the Bible as a cruel people who attacked thechildren of Israel right after they were free from slavery and left Egypt (Exodus 17:8). Hence the children of Israel were commanded to destroy the seed of Amalek (Ex 17:8-16). The Amalekites lived in the south of the land of Israel during the period of the settlement of the children of Israel in the Land of Israel to the period of themonarchy. In the Jewish folklore the Amalekites are considered to be the symbol of evil.

The Biblical relationship between the Hebrew and Amalekite tribes was that the Amalekite tribes without provocation pounced on the Hebrews when they were weak. The Amalekites became associated with ruthlessness and trickery and tyranny, even more so than Pharaoh or the Philistines, and required a ruthless response:

8 Then Amalek came and fought with Israel at Rephidim. 9 So Moses said to Joshua, “Choose for us men, and go out and fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand.” 10 So Joshua did as Moses told him, and fought with Amalek, while Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. 11 Whenever Moses held up his hand, Israel prevailed, and whenever he lowered his hand, Amalek prevailed. 12 But Moses’ hands grew weary, so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it, while Aaron and Hur held up his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side. So his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. 13 And Joshua overwhelmed Amalek and his people with the sword.

14 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write this as a memorial in a book and recite it in the ears of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.” 15 And Moses built an altar and called the name of it, The Lord is my banner, 16 saying, “A hand upon the throne of the Lord Jacob! The Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.” (Exodus 17)………

UNRESERVEDLY, this investigative journalist also coins them toadying “Jew-boys”…girls too, Herzog and Livni alike. This dangerous twosome (countless in tow, fueled with illegal foreign-funded “helping hands” from Obama Inc.) are aiming to destroy Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, substituting it as a “state for all its people’s”. By grabbing the reins of the premiership, by hook or by crook, they intend to do just that. Tragically, every grouping has their own “cross(es)” to bear, and this Amalekite trait is resonant with a segment of “my people”. Can you hear the guttural sigh from this American-Israeli, others as well, who will cast a vote in the upcoming March election.

Livni-Herzog campaign being financed by ‘Palestinian-Americans’

Jihadi

This should tell you all you need to know about the ideology and financing behind the effort to unseat Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Yes, it’s being run by Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential campaign. But it’s being paid for by ‘Palestinian-Americans.’ This came by email from Ronn Torossian.

A review of tax filings finds that One Voice paid $96,000 in 2011 toHoward Sumka.

Sumka was instrumental in providing “$1 million in American funding to a Hamas-run university in the Gaza Strip…”when he served as West Bank and Gaza Mission Director for US Aid.

Similarly, by reviewing the organization’s 990 tax filings, there areannual donations to The American Task Force on Palestine.

Very few Israelis would choose shared ideology with the American Task Force On Palestine, whose mission includesAn end to the Israeli occupation and the evacuation of all Israeli settlements”, and “A just solution for the Palestinian refugee problem, in accordance with international legality and the relevant UN resolutions.”

An executive board member of One Voice is Samer Hamadeh, who told Bloomberg in 2008 that “I grew up in Fresno, Calif., I went to Stanford, my parents left Palestine when they were kids and never looked back. I didn’t realize that I was Palestinian until my teens and not really what that meant until after 9/11.…”

Do prospective voters in Israel of “The Zionist Camp” identify with ideological backing from Hamadeh? One thinks that his ideology is most likely not in line with the mainstream voters that Issac Herzog and Tzipi Livni are chasing.

Well, maybe. But Sumka and Hamdeh definitely appear to be in line with Livni’s and Herzog’s ideology.

AND so whenever it becomes clear that leaders (with others in tandem, albeit not elected, oft-named, self-appointed “elitists”) betray the national trust, well, it is quite easy to identify them. Now, this should not be confused with an individual’s mere ideological differences, not at all. But it does have everything to do with their actions – to DIRECTLY undermine the nation’s foundations – regardless of any blathering to the contrary, yes, they too are nationalists! Liars. Reprobates.

ALONG this trajectory of understanding, let’s segue to Benghazigate, a focal point which blows back into Obama Inc’s Pentagon.

IN this regard, after General Ham attempted to save –  via life-saving air support – those trapped in Libya’s illegal war (hidden under the umbrella of Samantha Powers’s R2P…F/B/O the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, ISIS too), voilà, the Traitor-in-Chief had him summarily removed, and then proceeded to re-shuffle the Pentagon’s top decks. Coinquidink?

What are the odds on this happening? Two flag officers, operating in the same theater (Mideast area) both relieved or reassigned within a matter of days.

Highly-respected Army Gen. Carter Ham, boss at Africa Command the past 18 months, suddenly is brought home after rumors he was outraged when his offer to send in a reaction team to save the besieged Americans at Benghazi was turned down. There are reports that the general had a rapid response team all set to go, but was ordered to“STAND DOWN.”

Sources say the general said “to hell with that” and insisted the rescue attempt be tried. Within two minutes of the order, it is said the general was apprehended and his second-in-command officially relieved him of command.

We might add here, that Obama suck-up, that wretched little gnome, Gen. Martin Dempsey, who is Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has officially denied that report, claiming that Ham was on board with the Pentagon in deciding “against sending in U.S. forces” to attempt a rescue of the Americans in the beleaguered Benghazi compound.

 

ANOTHER FLAG OFFICER PAYS A HEAVY PRICE

If that wasn’t indication of possible dissension at high levels, Navy Rear Admiral, former commander of the USS John Stennis Strike Group, Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette was mysteriously relieved of duty, and all the brass will say is he is “under investigation” for, get this, “inappropriate leadership judgment.”

Just another way of saying that the admiral dared differ with the Administration’s Libya policy and perhaps openly defied Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. It’ll be interesting to see if the good admiral is court-martialed and if his trial would be open to the news media.

Other than the Fox News Channel, the MSM (“mainstream media”) are so far “in the tank” for their hero Obama, his re-election so important to them, the Benghazi lies and cover-up will be downplayed and/or ignored.

The YouTube anti-Muslim video excuse and cover-story has already been exposed for a fraud, but CNN, the Washington POST and New York TIMES have yet to ask the President any embarrassing questions.

SO as the treachery against valiant commanding officers became clear, it was particular sackings which led to a FULL purging. Consequentially, Obama Inc. understood that certain officers would not betray their oaths of leadership – in essence, to serve and protect – unlike their bosses!

ENTER, the unprecendented  purging of Generals, and for more than one reason.

WHEREAS those who were purged took their oaths seriously, on the other hand, Obama and gang have other plans for the U.S. military command (never mind the violation of the Posse Comitatus Act), that which involves targeting citizens on U.S. soil. Resultant, they realized that certain military higher-ups constituted a “liability.

NOW, let’s be very clear: HUSSEIN Obama is not interested in violating the above enshrined Act to save the nation, that would be another whole order of magnitude. However, incontestably, he is seeking to protect jihadis (and their anti-American supporters from the left) who seek to destroy the nation! And for this he needs “go to” officers who will target patriots!

 

 

BE afraid, very afraid….as the Anti-American-in-Chief has the outrageous gall to state: Americans are inviting jihad by criticizing Islam!  Beyond treacherous. Treasonous.

WHICH brings us back, once again, to MORE dire news…proof of his betrayal(s)…yet, his Pentagon mouthpieces (and other surrogates) dodge and weave via this and that spin cycle.

A U.S. military official on Thursday outlined plans to retake the key Iraq city of Mosul from Islamic State terrorists as early as April — an unusual move that immediately drew criticism from two U.S. intelligence officers.

A senior U.S. Central Command official said that the “shaping” for the battle is currently underway. The Iraqi military hopes to begin operations in the “April, May timeframe” and retake the city before Ramadan begins on June 17.

The official, who was not authorized to discuss the operation publicly and spoke with reporters on condition of anonymity, said five Iraqi Army brigades will be used in the fight, as well as several smaller brigades, adding up to a total force of up to 25,000 Iraqi troops.

Three brigades of Kurdish Peshmerga fighters will participate as well.

But two military intelligence officers told Fox News that the decision to publicly announce the plan was counterintuitive because it “TELEGRAPHS”the timing and number of units involved. The officers said it would allow Islamic State, also known as ISIS, or ISIL, to prepare for the battle by laying improvised explosive devices.

Both officers questioned whether political considerations on the part of the Obama administration factored into the decision to announce the offensive.

ISIS militants overtook Mosul last June, as the group marched across large sections of Iraq and Syria, sending Iraqi forces fleeing. At this point, officials estimate there are between 1,000 to 2,000 ISIS insurgents in the city of Mosul. Military leaders have been talking about retaking the city for some time, but they have said they won’t launch the operation until the Iraqi troops are ready.

 

W T F…

ALAS, U.S. soldiers would do well to finally realize that they ARE sitting ducks, and it is no accident. In fact, he ordered (as the so-called Commander-in-Chief)  Marines to “disarm”, as they fled Yemen with their tail between their legs. Said grave breach of the military’s code is of piece with ISIS being able to surround ! 320 Marines at an Iraqi (training) air base, effectively getting the drop on them. Indeed.

THUS, is it any wonder that this immoral pygmy conflated anti-semitism (the incurable hatred of Jews) with anti-Muslim sentiments, all the while Muslims lay waste to innocent people all over the globe! Apparently, targeting Jews, for the “crime” of being Jews and contributing more to humanity than most others, is now on par with ill will towards countless Muslims who slaughter under the banner of Islam!

“We’ve also seen, most recently in Europe, a rise in inexcusable acts of anti-Semitism, or in some cases, anti-Muslim sentiment or anti-immigrant sentiment,”Obama  told a Feb. 19 audience of U.S. and foreign officials and advocates, who met to discuss ways to minimize jihadi violence.

Peaceful criticism of Islamic culture is bad, he suggested. ”When people spew hatred toward others — because of their faith or because they’re immigrants — it feeds into terrorist narratives. … It feeds a cycle of fear and resentment and a sense of injustice upon which extremists prey,” he said.

So “we have to ensure that our diverse societies truly welcome and respect people of all faiths and backgrounds,” said Obama.

He insisted the conflict between Muslim and Western cultures is not caused by fundamentally different attitudes about freedom and religious solidarity.

TO wit, may the Jihadi-in-Chief choke on his own verbal vomit – and worse!

Read the article at Joe of America here:

THE VOICE OF REASON

Treason 4

FOR MORE ON ALLOBAMA’S TREASONOUS ACTS!

Obama-Generals-300x200

ISSUES BETWEEN OBAMA AND THE MILITARY:

HIGH RANKING MILITARY OFFICERS FIRED BY OBAMA:

obama-lawless-president-renegade-antichrist

FOR MORE ON OBAMA’S UTTER LAWLESSNESS:

Entry #785
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

February 23, 2015, 10:22 amYAHTZEE! Obama & Hillary Charged With Aiding and Abetting Terrorists

YAHTZEE! Obama & Hillary Charged With Aiding and Abetting Terrorists

Monday, February 23, 2015

IT’S ABOUT <snip> TIME…

AND WE HAVEN’T EVEN GOTTEN TO BENGHAZI!

Hmmmm… do you think this was the 400 STINGER MISSILES THAT WERE BEING ILLEGALLY FUNNELED TROUGH THE LIBYAN EMBASSY THE NIGHT OF BENGHAZI that ultimately resulted in Christopher Stevens being killed when he was hung out to dry? Or do you think it might be because those same STINGER MISSILES WERE USED TO SHOOT DOWN AN AMERICAN HELICOPTER?

No… wait… maybe it was aiding and abetting the enemy by GUTTING our military on a STALIN LIKE PURGE OF ITS BEST AND HIGHEST RANKED OFFICERS! Could that be it? Wait, wait, let’s not forget the recent article by Michael Connelly, Constitutional Attorney who wrote about SIXTEEN EXAMPLES OF OBAMA AIDING AND ABETTING THE ENEMY! Of course, they might be referring to ADMIRAL LYONS WHO HAS REPEATEDLY SAID OBAMA CONSPIRED WITH THE ENEMY IN AN ACT OF TREASON! Maybe that’s it. 

 

YOU KNOW WHAT? I DON’T CARE!

ARTICLE III, SECTION 3:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.”

 

SOMEONE SAVE ME A SEAT IN THE GALLOWS!

Treason

The Egyptian government has charged President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with being accessories to terrorism.

The charges stem from Obama and Clinton working with the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that Egypt has declared a terrorist group.

WAIT, NOT THE SAME MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD BARACK’S BROTHER MALIK IS THE HEAD OF A TERROR CELL?

NOT THAT MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD RIGHT?

AND 4/10 DEMOCRATS IN A RECENT POLL SAID OBAMA SHOULD BE “KING?”

King

The complaint against Obama names him as “an accessory to crimes committed by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.”

The charges go on to state that Obama, “cooperated, incited, and assisted the armed elements of the Muslim Brotherhood in the commission of crimes.”

STRANGE HUH? THE SAME THING A U.S ADMIRAL HAS SAID LIKE 10 TIMES… AT LEAST THE EGYPTIANS WERE LISTENING EVEN IF THE DEMOCRATS WEREN’T!

 

FOLKS, THIS HAS ALL BEEN IN THE LINKS FOR MONTHS!

READ THE LINKS I PROVIDE BELOW!!!!!

The U.S. State Department does not list the Muslim Brotherhood as a terror organization even though they have known ties to Hamas.

The charges against Clinton include that she worked to overthrow Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi, the current leader of Egypt.

Clinton is said to have been in contact with Naglaa Mahmood, the wife of Muslim Brotherhood member and Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi.

Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood were ousted by a military coup led by el-Sissi in 2013.

Obama and Clinton are also charged with attempted bribery, stemming from the White House giving the Muslim Brotherhood $8 billion to open up the Sinai Peninsula to Hamas, allowing the terror group to launch attacks on Israel (H/T Joe for America).

The so-called “Arab Spring” that was strongly supported by the Obama White House went from being a showcase of democracy to a foreign policy failure in a matter of months as long-time allies of the United States were ousted from power some of the most radical Muslim extremists on the planet filled the voids.

This, of course, was the direct result of Obama’s naive worldview when it comes to radical Islam and Islamic terror — the same worldview that allowed for the rise of the Islamic State.

The consequences of that worldview are now plain for everyone to see.

 

PLEASE SHARE THIS ON FACEBOOK AND TWITTER IF YOU THINK THE UNITED STATES NEEDS TO TRY THEM FOR TRESON!

Entry #784
View and Add Comments  (3 Comments)

February 11, 2015, 1:45 pmBREAKING: Several Admirals and Generals Accusing Obama of Treason!

BREAKING: Several Admirals and Generals Accusing Obama of Treason!

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

OBAMA HAS COMMITTED UNTHINKABLE CRIMES AGAINST THE U.S.

NEEDS TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON, FOUND GUILTY, AND HUNG!

Article III the Constitution states:  “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

Let’s get a few things straight. Obama has committed treason in so many ways and so many times most people jave lost track of the official count. Let’s look at the FACTS for a moment. Forget for a brief moment how quickly a republican would be thrown out of office with this nonsense swirling around all the time, and stop and realize we are letting a COMMUNIST get away with from OUR OWN the Oval Office. 

ALL OF THE MEN SHOWN ON VIDEO BELOW KNOW OBAMA IS A TRAITOR!

WHO BETTER TO KNOW THAN HIS MILITARY GENERALS & ADMIRALS?

 

I have posted at least 4-5 stories where on SEPARATE OCCASIONS where one of the military’s highest decorated officers , Admiral Lons, has come forward and accused Obama of crimes ranging from Treason, to Colluding with the Enemy, to Supplying the enemy with Stinger Missiles. For anyone who wants to get smart with me, and ask who I mean by “the enemy” I am referring to Al Qaeda! Admiral Lyons has been telling anyone who will listen, that Obama has committed TREASON! I myself have said since the DAY WE LEARNED 400 STINGER MISSILES IN ROUTE TO TERRORISTS WOUND UP MISSING FROM THE BENGHAZI EMBASSY, that it would be THOSE events that one day Obama would answer for. I take that back now. I think at this point the only Admiral Lyons has not told to get Obama are the men who used to be under his command. He should have them storm the White House and drag Obama out in cuffs. I pray that day comes soon. 

BEST EFFORTS BY ADMIRALS AND GENERALS TO BRING OBAMA’S CRIMES TO LIGHT:

America has gone SOFT. We are pathetic in SO many ways. I can’t say for sure how things WILL play out, but I can tell you how they WON’T play out. Not if, but WHEN the evidence of Obama’s piles up SO high something HAS to be done, Obama will be long out of office, he’ll flee the country like the Bitch that he is. He may be guilty and run, but he will NEVER see justice. I suspect as I have said since IMMEDIATELY after the Benghazi attack that his final downfall will be the 400 MISSILES HE WAS FUNNELING THROUGH THE EMBASSY IN LIBYA USING CHRIS STEVENS TO GET TO THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AND AL QAEDA

Where else but America is the Media SO twisted, and SO biased that they let a man with a SEALED past and a MUSLIM BROTHER NAMED MALIK WHO RUNS A MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TERRORIST GROUP BECOME PRESIDENT? Anyone with an IQ over 6 (sorry liberals, you’re OUT) knew <snip> well Obama was NOT eligible for office back in 2007, and despite piling up MOUNTAINS OF PROOF, no one even looked into it. Now, in SEVEN of the most disturbing pieces you will ever read you too will KNOW Obama is the ENEMY! 

Don’t stop there, the list of Obama’s treasonous acts extends almost as long as there are days he has spent tin the Oval Office. There is a LONG list of people accusing him of TREASON! Lieutenant General Thomas Mcinnerney has declared the government is infected with terrorist cells in every branch. 

10011445_603315889758507_1946368717_n

ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA: Thomas G. McInerney (born March 15, 1937) is a retired  United States Air Force  Lieutenant General. He is a command pilot with more than 4,100 flying hours, including 407 combat missions (243 in  O-1s as a forward air controller and 164 in  F-4 C’s, D’s and E’s) during the  Vietnam War. In addition to his Vietnam Service, the McInerney served overseas in  NATO Pacific Air Forces and as commander of  11th Air Force in  Alaska. Currently, he is a  Fox News contributor, and is a member of the  Iran Policy Committee.

McInerney’s Military Awards and Decorations Include: 

 

DOES HE SOUND LIKE SOMEONE CREDIBLE?

YOU BE THE JUDGE!

 

 

 

Conservative Tribune continues: It has long been suspected that President Barack Obama has a more than just friendly relationship with the terrorist-affiliated front group Muslim Brotherhood.

In fact, more than just a few sources have made note of how the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated various levels of the U.S. government, including the highest levels of the White House.

Now the former commander of the Navy’s Pacific Fleet is coming forward and speaking up about the issue as well, stating that all of our nation’s intelligence services have been infiltrated by the terrorist front group.

Retired 4-star Admiral James “Ace” Lyons recently spoke to the National Press Club about Obama’s efforts to “fundamentally transform” America, something he has been doing since he was first elected in 2008.

Lyons pointed to Obama’s recent refusal to join other world leaders in Paris to take a stand for freedom of expression, saying this is just the latest of “many signals” of support he has sent to the Islamic jihadists over the years

“There’s no question we got a hell of a job ahead of us,” Lyons said, “with the Muslim Brotherhood penetration in every one of our national security agencies, including all our intelligence agencies.”

He pointed to the current head of the CIA, John Brennan, who is believed to be a convert to Islam, as proof of his assertions, according to the TPNN.

READ THIS FOR A HORRIBLE REVELATION ABOUT BRENNAN!

He went on to call for more action from the new GOP-led Congress, saying they were elected to “stop the transformation of America, not to see how they could work with the president.”

Unfortunately, the admiral is correct.  The Muslim Brotherhood most certainly does hold undue sway and influence over the Obama administration.

One need only ask the people and government of Egypt how they feel about the Muslim Brotherhood and the connections between the terrorist group and the White House.

Congress most certainly needs to do something to address this problem, as it looks remarkably like treason coming out of this administration.

 

Famous Journalist Drops Bombshell About Benghazi Liars Obama and Rice

 

 

 

Conservative Tribune e Continues: Conservatives have been fed up with the president’s convoluted strategy in the Middle East for years, but now it looks like the mainstream media is also getting tired of President Barack Obama’s indecision.

One of the most well-known journalists in America just criticized Obama and his advisers, including Susan Rice.

Bob Woodward appeared on “Fox News Sunday” and explained his view that the White House has no clear plan for dealing with Islamic terror groups and that the administration was badly micro-managing the military.

Woodward knows a few things about corrupt presidents. He was one of the key reporters responsible for exposing the infamous Watergate scandal during the Nixon administration.

“They (the Obama administration) have not sat down and said, ‘This is where we want to go and this is how we want to do it,’” said Woodward.

He’s exactly right. The Obama administration seems to rely on the backwards strategy of “ready, fire, aim” — if they ever fire at all.

That isn’t leadership, and that isn’t how America should deal with the deep problems of the Islamic State terror group or the Middle East.

 

WHEN DO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GET JUSTICE?

IMG_0602

THE VOICE OF REASON

Treason 4

ISSUES BETWEEN OBAMA AND THE MILITARY:

DON’T KNOW WHO MICHAEL CONNELLY IS?

Connelly

MICHAEL CONNELLY IS AS RESPECTED AS THEY COME IN LEGAL CIRCLES DEALING WITH THE CONSTITUTION. MICHAEL IS BOTH A CONSTITUTIONAL ATTORNEY (A REAL ONE, NOT THE OBAMA VARIETY), AND A UNITED STATES ARMY VETERAN. 

ON HIS WEBSITE HE WRITES:

“I am a U.S. Army veteran, a Constitutional attorney, Executive Director of the United States Justice Foundation, and a published author, freelance writer, and teacher. I am the author of four books,  ”RIDERS IN THE SKY: THE GHOSTS AND LEGENDS OF PHILMONT SCOUT RANCH,” “THE MORTARMEN,” a story about my father’s unit in WW II; my novel, “AMAYEHLI: A STORY OF AMERICA,“ and the newly released “AMERICA’S LIVELIEST GHOSTS.” In addition, I have an affordable, pocket size booklet on the Constitution called “Our Constitution” that is receiving great reviews. You can read more about these books by going to the pages on each book on this website.” You may also want to check out his radio talk show that airs every Wednesday at 4:00 Eastern.

HERE IS THE WEBSITE CONTAINING THE LINK TO THE RADIO SHOW:

 

MICHAEL HAS TRIED TO HAVE OBAMA IMPEACHED SEVERAL TIMES:

Treason 3

FOR MORE ON ALL OBAMA’S TREASONOUS ACTS!

 

Benghazi 1

 

Entry #783
View and Add Comments  (3 Comments)

February 10, 2015, 9:47 pmYour Wages are NOT lawful "income."

Your Wages are NOT lawful “income.”

Monday, February 9, 2015

 

Your wages are NOT lawful “Income!”

The IRS has been under fire in recent months regarding corruption on various levels.  It is bad enough the lamestream media is ignoring the scandals that are exposed, but the single greatest fraud by the IRS that everyone is ignoring is the IRS’ claim that American’s wages, salary and compensation for services is actual lawful “income.”  This is a great lie that has been ongoing for over 100 years.  Original intent of Congress and supported by the U.S. Supreme Court and others, clearly reveal that personal wages and such were NEVER originally intended to be classified as “income” which could be taxed by the Federal Government.

This fraud has cost Americans trillions of dollars over the past 100 years, and is continuing… but many people are waking up to this lie and are taking steps to remove themselves from this system, using the laws and court cases themselves.  The topic of how the IRS is deceiving Americans covers a host of provable lies involving purposely deceptive language in the code itself, and, of course, their usual fearmongering and propaganda tactics.  (In fact, the IRS has NO lawful authority in the States or over private citizens.  That is for another story which will shock you).

This article will address just the element of what income is and is not.  The below material is taken from a U.S. Supreme Court case which was filed as part of Case # No. 12-6169, which they ignored, including their own standing and never overturned cases.  There is a lot of supporting documentation on this, and much greater fraud, which will empower you to begin challenging the IRS as more and more people are doing.  Keep in mind that the IRS and 9 other courts also completely ignored this evidence, and the IRS played their usual unlawful games in responding to the allegations in the other federal courts.

Surprisingly, in the U.S. Supreme Court, the IRS waived its right to respond, which in any court in the country, is a default under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 55.  This was brought to the Supreme Court’s attention, and they stated, “we don’t do that here.”  How convenient.  In any case it is still a lawful  default.  The question one should ask is (why would they waive their right to respond, if they are lawfully right?)

We need more and more people challenging the IRS’ legal standing, and choosing to get out of their corrupt system… of course, through taking the right steps.

U.S. Supreme Court Case # No. 12-6169 challenge question as to “what is income.”

Question 2 discussion:  Over the decades, since the early 1900s, the definition for what is called “income” has been distorted from original intent, and what was well known by the Courts, Congress and the People. Respondent (IRS)has consistently claimed that “income” includes wages, salaries and compensation for services.

However, this “interpretive regulation” is trying to “make income of that which is not income,” according to the 16th Amendment.  Helvering (1).

When challenged with this question, Respondent has provided nothing in response but hearsay and presumption, which is not evidence (A.C. Aukerman (2); Del Vecchio (3); New York (4). Presumption is not “a means of escape from constitutional restrictions” (Heiner (5). “Presumption” does not replace the burden of proof or rebuttal.

Respondent claims that “all that comes in” as wages, salary or compensation for service is “income according to the proper definition” of what it classifies as “gross income” and is subject to its taxation scheme, contrary to Doyle (6) in defining “income.” Originally, “income” was classified as “gains and profits” from “corporate activity” (Merchants (7), unearned wealth or assets arising from the “source” of the lawful “income” (45 Congressional Record. 4420-4423, (8).

Precedent shows that lawful “income” is “the gain derived from or through the sale or conversion of capital assets: from labor or from both combined” (Taft (9). What defines income “must have the essential feature of gain to the recipient” (Conner, (10) ; U.S.C.A. (11).

For Respondent to consider wages as all “gain” or “profit” is to distort the definition of income. This Court stated it did not accept the idea of a tax on occupations and labor (Pollock (12).

Income was clearly classified as “gains and profits,” which “limit the meaning of” income. Income was not “everything that comes in” (Southern Pacific (13). It was understood to be a “tax on the yearly profits arising from property, professions, trades, and offices” (Black’s Law (14). Respondent claims that wages are “income” and that “deriving” income as the 16th Amendment states equals the wages one receives from work, yet the Courts have clearly stated that one does not “derive” income through work (Edwards (15).

In matter of fact, there is “no material difference” between Petitioner’s, or any American’s, labor and what he receives as wages. Thus, there is no lawful “income” (profit). (Material difference is discussed thoroughly in Cottage (16) People’s labor is merely “exchanged” for money (Coppage (17).

Labor is property (Butchers’ Union Co.(18); Slaughter House (19) and is like “a tree; income is the fruit; labour is a tree; income the fruit; capital, the tree; income the fruit” (Waring (20). Selling labor is no different from selling goods (Adkins (21). Wages and salaries for labor represent the conversion of property but realize no gain in that mere conversion. Labor, being “property,” is the tree from which “income” or “gain” can be “derived,” if it is used for that purpose, but for Respondent to claim it can tax the whole “tree” (wages) as “profit” is tantamount to claiming limbs of the tree are always “profit” and removing them, limiting any hope of fruit—true “income,” or “gain,” from those limbs—or more lawful income to government, and not impoverish citizens.

Recognition of the inherent elements of wages and personal costs to produce labor is vital. It is patently unjust, unconscionable and unfair to force people to offer up all their wages as pure “profit” when there are ample “costs” related to the production of labor. “The freedom and right to earn a living through any lawful occupation is exempt from taxation by the federal government.” (Grosjean (22); Coppage (17).

In 1939, “only 3.9% of the population” of the United States were covered by the income tax . . . only a small portion of the population” Treasury Department’s Division of Tax Research (23).

How can that be when far more than 3.9% of Americans in 1939 provided labor or services for wages? That is because wages were not then, and are not today, lawful “income,” and only 3.9% of the population in 1939 were wealthy enough to actually have true “income” (unearned wealth, or a corporate profit) or income “derived
from” their principal, or savings).

The term “income” was never meant to include principal, or what are wages, as there was a clear “distinction between income and principal” (1913 Congressional Record (24).  This Court has also always made a clear distinction between “profit” and “wages.” Wages were not “profit” and could not be taxed. U.S. v. Balard (25).

Income is “not a wage or compensation for any type of labor” (Staples (26). “Reasonable compensation for labor or services rendered is not profit” (Laureldale Cemetery (27).

People of the early 1900s understood that the “new system” of taxation would not involve wages or salaries as “an income” (Gov. A.E. Wilson on the Income Tax (28). The right to work and receive wages for labor “cannot be taxed as privilege” (Jack Cole(29); Coppage (17).

Respondent’s own code (1939) stated in Section 22 GROSS INCOME:

(a) “Gross income includes gains, profits, and income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal service . . .”

Gains, profit and income are redundant terms and confuse the lawful definition of what a “profit” is because it is the same thing as “gain,” or “income.” They all mean the same thing. Defining it in 1939, Section 22 shows there was a clear difference between “profits” and “wages.”

If “gains, profit and income” are synonymous with “salaries, wages, or compensation,” why state “derived from”? One does not “derive” income “from” a wage if they lawfully mean the same thing. If wages are income already, why use the term “derived from”?

Gross “income” includes gains, profits and income “derived from” salaries, wages or compensation for personal services, and “salaries, wages or compensation for personal service are not to be taxed as an entirety unless in their entirety they are gains, profits and income” (Lucas (30). It should also be noted that “gross income” also includes that which is derived from a corporate profit, or unearned wealth, as elsewhere argued, but something conspicuously missing from the definition.

The wages Petitioner or any American makes cannot be counted in their entirety as a “profit,” for this makes labor worth nothing (zero basis for labor costs to wage earned), which is nothing more than slavery.

A direct tax on wages is a tax that diminishes the source of potential “income” and has been declared unconstitutional. An indirect tax on wages is unconstitutional because an indirect tax is a tax on privilege; i.e., wealth-producing unearned income, or in making a corporate profit, neither of which Petitioner (or most Americans receiving wages) is involved with. Lawful taxation leaves the source (wealth, property or limbs growing from the tree) producing the “income” undiminished, and taps the true income “derived from” the source—the actual fruit coming off the “tree.”

Twice during the debates on the 16th Amendment, Congress rejected the idea of bringing direct taxes within the authority of the 16th Amendment. Then twice more, on July 5, 1909, Congress rejected the idea by direct vote of the Senate (S.J.R. No. 25 and S.J.R. No. 39).

This argument by Respondent was in response to the question put to the Court by Peck (31) as to whether the 16th Amendment created any new taxing power, which the Court stated clearly it did not. Thus, Respondent has clearly distorted and obfuscated the original intended definition of “income.”

Petitioner cannot declare he has “income” when he does not have any, in violation of his conscience and to not present false testimony via the 1040 form under penalty of perjury.

Who is Petitioner to believe and how does he act when confronted with this Court’s and other Courts’ long-standing decisions? (A 64-page brief on “income” is in previously named Court documents for more detail.)

Finally, it must be noted that the law provides for protection from taxes upon income “excluded by law” (Treas. Reg. §1.61-1 (32) and income “not taxable by the Federal Government under the Constitution” (Treas. Reg. §1.312-6[b] (33). It is Petitioner’s contention that these exclusions have not been lawfully determined as yet, and the issue of “income” may fall under these regulations.
______________________________________________________________________________
End Notes

I. Helvering v. Edison Bros. Stores, 133 F2d 575. (1943) “The Treasury cannot by
interpretive regulations, make income of that which is not income within the
meaning of revenue acts of Congress, nor can Congress, without apportionment, tax
as income that which is not income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment.”

2. A.C. Aukerman Co. v. R.L. Chaides Canst. a; 960 F.2d 1020, 1037 (Fed. Cir.
1992) “This court has never treated a presumption as any form of evidence.”

3. Del Vecchio v. Bowers, 296 U.S. 280, 286, 56 S.Ct. 190, 193, 80 L.Ed. 229 (1935 .
“[A] presumption is not evidence.”

4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Gamer, 303 U.S. 161, 171, 58 S.Ct. 500, 503, 82 L.Ed.
726 (1938) “[A presumption] cannot acquire the attribute of evidence …”)

5. Heiner v. Donnan, 285, US 312 (1932) and New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 US
254 (1964) “The power to create [false] presumptions is not a means of escape from
constitutional restrictions.”

6. Doyle v. Mitchell Brother, Oo., 247 US 179 (1918)
“We must reject in this case . . . the broad contention submitted in behalf of the
Government that all receipts-everything that comes in-are income within the
proper definition of the term ‘income’ .. .”

7. Merchants Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanks, 225 U.S. 509, 518, 519. (1923)
“Income, as defined by the Supreme Court means, ‘gains and profits’ as a result of
corporate activity and ‘profit gained through the sale or conversion of capital assets.’
” (Also see 399. Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co. 247 U.S. 179, Eisner v. Macomber 252
U.S. 189, Evans v. Gore 253 U.S. 245, Summers v. Earth Island Institute, No. 07463
tn.s., March 3,2009] kiting Bender v. Williamsport Area School Dist., 475 U.
S. 534, 541 {1986}]).

8. 45 Congressional Record, 4420 (1909)
“Mr. Heflin. ‘An income tax seeks to reach the unearned wealth of the country and
to make it pay its share.’ 4423 Mr. Heflin. ‘But sir, when you tax a man on his
income, it is because his property is productive. He pays out of his abundance
because he has got the abundance.’ “

9. Taft v. Bowers, N.Y. 1929, 49 S.Ct. 199, 278 U.S. 470, 73 L.Ed. 460
“The meaning of ‘income’ in this amendment is the gain derived from or through the
sale or conversion of capital assets: from labor or from both combined; not a gain
accruing to capital or growth or increment of value in the investment, but a gain,
a profit, something of exchangeable value, proceeding from the property, severed
from the capital however employed and coming in or being ‘derived,’ that is,
received or drawn by the recipient for his separate use , benefit, and disposal.”

10. Conner v. United States, 303 F. Supp. 1187 (1969) p. 1191: 47 C.J.S. InternalRevenue 98, p. 226
“[2] Whatever may constitute income, therefore, must have the essential feature of
gain to the recipient. This was true when the 16th amendment became effective, it
was true at the time of the decision in Eisner v. Macomber, it was true under
section 22(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and it is true under section
6I(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. If there is no gain, there is no income.”
“[1] … It [income] is not synonymous with receipts. Simply put, pay from a job is a
‘wage,’ and wages are not taxable. Congress has taxed income, not compensation.”

11. u.s. G.A. Const. Am 16
“There must be gain before there is ‘income’ within the 16th Amendment.”

12. Pollock, 158 U.S. at 635 -637
“We have considered the act only in respect of the tax on income derived from real
estate, and from invested personal property, and have not commented on so much of
it as bears on gains or profits from business, privileges, or employments, in view of
the instances in which taxation on business, privileges, or employments has
assumed the guise of an excise tax and been sustained as such. It is evident that the
income from realty formed a vital part of the scheme for taxation embodied therein.
If that be stricken out, and also the income from all investments of all kinds, it is obvious that by far the largest part of the anticipated revenue would be eliminated,
and this would leave the burden of the tax to be borne by professionals, trades,
employments, or vocations; and in that way what was intended as a tax on capital
would remain in substance as a tax on occupations and labor. We cannot believe
that such was the intention of Congress. We do not mean to say that an act laying
by apportionment a direct tax on all real estate and personal property , or the
income thereof, might not lay excise taxes on business, privileges, employments and
vocations. But this is not such an act; and the scheme must be considered as a
whole.”

13. Southern Pacific v. Lowe, U.S. 247 F. 330. (1918)
“… [Ilncorne: as used in the statute should be given a meaning so as not to include
everything that comes in. The true function of the words 'gains' and 'profit s' is to
limit the meaning of the word 'income.' "

14. Black's LawDictionary, 2nd Edition, "Income Tax"
" 'A tax on the yearly profits arising from property, professions, trades and offices.'
See also 2 Staph. Comm 573. Levi v. Louisville, 97 Ky. 394,

15. Edwards v. Keith, 231 F. 110 (2nd Cir. 1916)
"The statute and the statute alone determines what is income to be taxed. It taxes
only income 'derived' from many different sources; one does not 'derive income' by
rendering services and charging for them."

16. Cottage Savings Assn. v. Commissioner, 499 Ll .S. 554 (1991)

17. Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1, at 14, 23, 24 (1915)
"Included in the right of personal liberty and the right of private property are
taking of the nature of each is the right to make contracts for the acquisition of
property. The chief among such contracts instead of personal employment, by which
in labor and other services are exchanged for money or other forms of property. If
this right be struck down or arbitrarily interfered with, there is a substantial
impairment ofliberty in the long established constitutional sense. The right is as
essential to the laborer as to the capitalist, to the poor as to the rich; for the vast
majority of persons have no other artists away to begin to acquire property, save by
working for money... The right to follow any lawful vocation and to make contracts
is as completely within the protection of the Constitution as the right to hold
property free from unwarranted seizure, or the liberty to go when and where one
will . One of the ways of obtaining property is by contract. The right, therefore, to
contract cannot be infringed by the legislature without violating the letter and
spirit of the Constitution. Every citizen is protected in his right to work where and
for whom he will. He may select not only his employer, but also his associates."

18. Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City, Colorado, 111 U.S. 746, 757 (1883)
"It has been well said that, the property which every man has in his own labor, as it
is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and
inviolable . . ."

19. Slaughter House, 83 U.S. 36, at 127 (1873)
"Property is everything which has an exchangeable value, in the right of property
includes the power to dispose of that according to the will of the owner. Labor is
property, and as such merits protection. The right to make it available is next in
importance to the rights of life and liberty. It lives to a large extend the foundation
of most other forms of property, and of all solid individual and national prosperity."

20. Waring v. City of Savannah, 60 Ga . 93, 100 (1878)
"So that, perhaps, the true question is this: is income property, in the sense of t he
constitution, and must it be taxed at the same rate as other property? The fact is,
property is a tree; income is the fruit; labour is a tree; income the fruit; capital,
the tree; income the fruit. The fruit, if not consumed (severed) as fast as it ripens,
will germinate from the seed .. . and will produce other trees and grow into more
property; but so long as it is fruit merely, and plucked (severed) to eat .. . it is no
tree, and will produce itself no fruit."

21. Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. at 558
"In principle, there can be no difference between the case of selling labor and the
case of selling goods."

22. Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233 (1936); Jones v. Opelika, 316 U.S.
584, 56 S.Ct. 444 (1943). (See also Follett v. McCormick, 321 U.S. 573 64 S.Ct. 717
[1944]; Harper v. Virginia Bd ofElections, 383 U.S. 663, 86 S.Ct. 1079 [1966])
“The freedom and right to earn a living through any lawful occupation is exempt
from taxation by t he federal government !” (emphasis added) .

23. Treasury Department’s Division of Tax Research publication, “Collection at
Source of the Individual Normal Income Tax,” 1941
“For 1936, taxable income tax returns filed represented only 3.9% of the population
. . . [Olnly a small proportion of the population of the United States is covered by
the income tax."

24. 1913 Congressional Record, p. 3843, 3844; Senator
Albert B. Cummins "The word 'income' has a well defined meaning before the
amendment of the Constitution was adopted. It has been defined in all of t he
courts of t his country . .. If we could call anything that we pleased income, we could
obliterate all the distinction between income and principal. The Congress can not
affect the meaning of the word 'income' by any legislation whatsoever .. .

Obviously the people of this country did not intend to give to Congress the power to
levy a direct tax upon all the property of this country without apportionment."

25. u.s. v. Balsrd, 535, 575 F. 2D 400 (1976); (see also Oliver v. Halstead, 196 VA
992; 86 S.E. Rep. 2D 858)
"Gross income and not 'gross receipts' is the foundation of income tax liability . . .
The general term 'income' is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code . . . 'gross
income' means the total sales, less the cost of goods sold, plus any income from
investments and from incidental or outside operations or sources. 575 There is a
clear distinction between 'profit' and 'wages' or 'compensat ion for labor.'
Compensation for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law .
. . The word profit is a different thing altogether from mere compensation for labor .
. . The claim that salaries, wages and compensation for personal services are to be
taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the individual who
performed the services ... is without support either in the language of the Act or in
the decisions of the courts construing it and is directly opposed to provisions of the
Act and to Regulations of the Treasury Department ..."

26. Staples v. us; 21 F Supp 737 U.S. Dist. Ct. ED PA, 1937]
“Income within the meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment and Revenue Act, means
‘gains’ . . . and in such connection ‘gain’ means profit … proceeding from property,
severed from capital, however invested or employed and coming in, received or
drawn by the taxpayer, for his separate use , benefit and disposal … Income is not a
wage or compensation for any type of labor.”

27. Laureldale Cemetery Assn. v. Matthews, 47 Atlantic 2d. 277 (1946)
“. .. Reasonable compensation for labor or services rendered is not profit …”

28. Gov. A.E. Wilson on the Income Tax (16) Amendment, New York Times, Part 5,
p. 13, February 26, 1911
“The poor man or the man in moderate circumstances does not regard his wages or
salary as an income that would have to pay its proportionate tax under this new
system.”

29. Jack Cole Company v. Alfred T, MacFarland, Commissioner, 206 Tenn. 694, 337
S.W.2d 453 Sup. Court of Tennessee (1960)
“Since the right to receive income or earnings is a right belonging to every persons,
this right cannot be taxed as privilege.” (See also Jerome H. Sheip Co. v. Amos, 100
Fla. 863, 130 So. 699, 705 [1930]; Redfield v. Fisher, 135 Or. 180, 292 P. 813,
819 [Ore. 1930]; Sims v. Ahrens, 167 Ark. 557, 271 S.W. 720, 733 [1925]; O’KeeJe v.
CityofSomerville, 190 Mass. 110,76 N.E. 457, 458 [1906]).

30. Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 (1930)
“The claim that salaries, wages, and compensation for personal services are to be
taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the individual who has
performed the services . . . is without support, either in the language of the Act
or in the decisions of the courts construing it. Not only this, but it is directly
opposed to provisions of the Act and to regulations of the U.S. Treasury
Department, which either prescribed or permits that compensations for personal
services not be taxed as a entirety and not be returned by the individual performing
the services. It has to be noted that, by the language of the Act, it is not salaries,
wages or compensation for personal services that are to be included in gross income.
That which is to be included is gains, profits, and income derived from salaries,
wages, or compensation for personal services.”

31. Peck & Co. v. Lowe, 247 U.S. 165 (1917) Brief for the Appellant at 11, 14-15
“The Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution has not enlarged the taxing power
of Congress or affected the prohibition against its burdening exports. (11) This is
brought out clearly by this court in Brushaber v. Union Pscitic Railroad Co., 240
U.S. 1, and Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103. In the former case it was
pointed out that the all-embracing power of taxation conferred upon Congress by
the Constitution included two great classes, one indirect taxes or excises, and the
other direct taxes, and that of apportionment with regard to direct taxes. It was
held that the income tax in its nature is an excise; that is, it is a tax upon a person
measured by his income . .. It was further held that the effect of the Sixteenth
Amendment was not to change the nature of this tax or to take it out of the class of
excises to which it belonged, but merely to make it impossible by any sort of
reasoning thereafter to treat it as a direct tax because of the sources from which the
income was derived. ([14-15] Peck & Co. v; Lowe, 247 U.S. 165 [1917]. Not in the
ruling itself).”

32. Treas. Reg. §1.61-1
“Gross income means all income from whatever source derived, unless excluded by
law.”

33. Treas. Reg. §1.312-6(b)
“Among the items entering into the computation of corporate earnings and profits
for a particular period are all income exempted by statute, income not taxable by
the Federal Government under the Constitution, as well as all items includable
in gross income under section 61 or corresponding provisions of prior revenue acts.”

____________________________________________________________________

What can you do now with this information?  Research the web sites mentioned below.  Knowledge of the actual laws, or lack thereof, and the Constitution and court cases is vital to defending against this domestic terrorist organization all America hates, but believe they are powerless against it.  YOU ARE NOT.

Educate yourself, then exercise your rights under the law. http://www.foundationfortruthinlaw.org/Files/11-IRS-Documents/. 
                                         
You can also go to http://thematrixhasyou.org/no-tax.html for more information, and examples of actual letters to the IRS which ask basic questions.  Keep it simple… two or three questions to begin with, like what is the lawful definition of income (it isn’t in the code), what type of tax is income tax, direct or indirect, and where in the code does it make YOU personally liable to file a 1040 form.

They will likely send one of their form letters saying they are not going to answer such questions and will not in the future, despite their own code stating they are supposed to answer.  The problem is, they can’t answer with the truth or law, so they ignore us.  So much for transparent public servants, right?  Time to remove 150 million of us from this fraud and let our reps know about the lies.  The IRS will cease to exist once that happens.

Remember, the 1040 form is self-assessing.  If it were an actual constitutional law that authorizes the government to tax our wages, they could simply calculate the tax and send us a bill, but that is unconstitutional, so they trick us all into playing their game, under threat of course, and we assess ourselves.  They view this money volunteered, under law, as a “gift” to the government.  Nice racket, right?

The People created the government.  WE are their bosses, so start acting like it.

Entry #782
View and Add Comments  (1 Comment)

February 10, 2015, 12:52 pmBarack Obama's Lawyer Admits Birth Certificate Is Forged



Barack Obama’s Lawyer Admits Birth Certificate Is Forged

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

 

ONLY SO MANY TIMES I CAN ASK…

WHEN DO WE OWN UP TO WHAT WE’VE DONE?

Sure, It’s an older story, but it goes hand in hand with my post yesterday titled: THE SMOKING GUN IN THE OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CASE: STANLEY ANN DUNHAM’S PASSPORT. In a post dated June 20th titled:  OBAMA MUST BE ARRESTED & PROSECUTED FOR IMPERSONATING A PUBLIC OFFICER, the author goes into  GREAT detail about Barack Obama’s status as a  USURPER of the Presidency. As such, the author tells us Obama  CANNOT be impeached, because only a Lawful President can be Impeached. Obama was  NEVER qualified for the office of the President of the United States. Rather, Obama hijacked it. He is an  IMPOSTOR…  a charlatan. Even  OBAMA HIMSELF ADMITS THAT HE WAS BORN IN KENYA, but we’re long passed the point of being able to do anything about it. 

In 1979, an article was uncovered  WRITTEN BY VALERIE JARRETT’S FATHER-IN-LAW ABOUT A MUSLIM PLAN TO PURCHASE THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES.  If you  READ that  HORRIBLY disturbing article (that was written decades ago (and  LONG before the years of the Obama Debacle), does the claim by an Iranian Commander that  THE WHITE HOUSE IS ISIS HEADQUARTERS  really  seem  THAT outlandish?

Perhaps that alone isn’t enough. What about the  OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DOING NOTHING TO STOP KNOWN JIHAD TRAINING CAMPS right here in the United States? What about  FORMER CIA AGENTS COMING OUT AND SAYING OBAMA IS A “RADICAL ISLAMIST” AND ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES? 

We have  FOUR STAR ADMIRALS WHO HAVE SAID OBAMA HAS CONSPIRED WITH THE ENEMY, other members of the  CIA CONFIRM OUR WORST FEARS ABOUT BARACK OBAMA, and  OBAMA’S INSISTENCE THAT AMERICAN SOLDIERS BE WILLING TO FIRE ON AMERICANS… does any of that concern you? Even the  NEW ARMY MANUAL DETAILS THE USE OF LETHAL FORCE ON U.S. CITIZENS EVEN THOSE PEACEFULLY PROTESTING! 

AT WHAT POINT DO WE REALLY FACE THE FACTS OF WHAT WE’VE DONE?

WHEN DO AMERICANS TAKE OWNERSHIP OF OUR MISTAKE?

READ WHAT SENIOR CHIEF GEOFF ROSS WRITES ABOUT OBAMA’S SEALED PAST!

Treason(1)

 

WHAT’S HEARTBREAKING…

 IS THIS WILL NEVER MAKE THE EVENING NEWS….

We were right about EVERYTHING!  Pick a subject, something liberals had a derogatory name for, and something they called us crazy about in 2008… pick anything… we were right on ALL of it. We have the most successful TERRORIST of all time sitting in the Oval Office. Hijack a plane? Heck, he took a country… and now, whether liberal or conservative, smart enough to see it coming, or probably not so much if you’re a liberal, YOUR kids and YOUR grandkids will pay for YOUR mistake. 

 

WHAT’S WORSE? 

WE’LL READ THIS, NOD, AND GO ABOUT OUR DAY…

It appears the web is a buzz with information concerning the New Jersey court contest in regards to Barack Obama’s eligibility to be on the state’s ballot. At the center of the controversy now is the fact that Barack Obama’s own lawyer has apparently conceded the fact that the document is a forgery.

 

According to TeaPartyTribune.com, attorney Alexandra Hill, of the Newark-based law firm Genova, Burn and Giantomasi, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. She concluded her analysis of the online birth certificate arguing that it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot.”

She then went on to try and establish his eligibility by speaking of his political popularity, not legal qualification, in order to be a candidate!

Penbrook Johannson, editor for The Daily Pen wrote:

“Sadly, regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified. Obama’s eligibility is a separate matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal authority. Until some court of competent jurisdiction is willing to hear evidence of forgery and fraud, you can’t legally punish a political candidate for that crime which has not been proven that they committed. However, since Obama is not eligible because of a lack of authenticated evidence to the contrary, he could be held off the ballot for that reason.”

So what this comes down to is legal tip toeing around the issue. Let me put it simply. Obama’s own lawyer admits that the birth certificate which was put out by the White House is irrelevant to his placement on th e ballot. The birth certificate does not prove Obama is not a “natural born” citizen since it is a forgery. Therefore, the plaintiffs have not made their case and Barack Obama should be left on the ballot. I’ll bet Mr. Bill “It depends on what is, is” Clinton was behind this bit of legal wrangling.

As far as I can see that makes it a bigger issue than just that of the State of New Jersey. This is most definitely a national issue. The President of the United States’ own lawyer has just stated unequivocally that the President knowingly put out a forged document and claimed it was his birth certificate. Ladies and gentlemen, why in the world then, is there no immediate cries for impeachment and more than that, charges of treason brought against Barack Hussein Obama?

Treason 3

Entry #781
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

February 9, 2015, 10:53 amEnemy in the White House

Enemy in the White House

 

tyrannocide05


Obama's speech at the National Prayer Breakfast Thursday continues to send shockwaves through this country.

Obama's statement has quickly become notorious: "Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the crusades and the inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ." Not yesterday, President Obama. Centuries ago. Not yesterday.

People committed terrible deeds in the cause of Allah yesterday, and the day before and the day before – but Obama refuses to say that.

Contrary to his claims that Christians were slaughtering in the name of Christ, we see none of that. Nowhere do you see Christians beheading, setting alight or crucifying non-Christians while screaming, "Christ is greatest!" Obama had the unmitigated gall to bring up the Spanish Inquisition and what was done at the end of that 800-year-old war, as well as the Crusades (which Obama mentioned as well), which was against the Muslim hordes close to 1,000 years ago. Had it not been for Charles Martel beating back the Muslim armies, Europe would look like the hellhole that much of the Middle East looks like today.

Obama insists that "the future does not belong to those that slander the prophet of Islam," but insults Jesus Christ? He's all in.

Obama freely brought up Christianity's ancient history, but did not mention Islam's 1,400-year bloody history of jihadi war, land appropriations, cultural annihilations, and enslavements. He failed to mention the 1,400 jihad against the Jews raging still today against Israel and Jews across the world. And, of course, he did not discuss the religion's bloody jihad now. On the contrary, he falsely claimed that Islam was being "hijacked."

Hijacked, how? Jihadists are citing the Quran, chapter and verse. They are using Muhammad as their "perfect example." Obama never said Christianity had been hijacked a thousand years ago. But he did make the outrageous claim that Jim Crow and slavery were sanctioned in the name of Christ.

Jim Crow was not in the name of Christ. Slavery was not in the name of Christ. These are despicable statements from the leader of the free world. But jihad is in the cause of Allah, and this he will not say.

Jesus did not behead, kill, rape, or steal from conquered people, calling the theft righteous booty. Jesus did not marry a six-year-old. Muhammad did. And he slaughtered untold numbers, with his mujahadeen raping and pillaging every bloody step of the way.

Those of us who saw this coming back in 2008 and 2009 were excoriated, ridiculed and marginalized for speaking the truth about Obama's past. In 2007, I wrote a commentary for Israel National News titled, "Obama, the Muslim Thing, And Why It Matters." Before Obama's election, anyone who used his middle name, Hussein, was labeled a racist-anti-Muslim-Islamophobic-bigot. And yet the first call he made to a foreign "leader" after he was inaugurated was to terror leader Mahmoud Abbas. The first interview he gave was with al Arabiya television. His first world tour was an apology tour to the Muslim world, culminating in a speech from the leading Islamic university in Cairo, Al Azhar. He invited the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group to his speech in Cairo, despite the fact that it had been banned for decades. Then President Mubarak and his cabinet, America's 30-year ally in that troubled region, could not attend Obama's speech because of the terror presence.

It's why I wrote my 2010 book, "The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America."

And now, five years later, with the global jihad roiling the world thanks to Obama's support and sanction, he deigns to tell us what our religion is.

President Dawah. The more jihad rages, the more Obama proselytizes for Islam. Muslim countries like Jordan are taking a much harder line than the U.S. It's outrageous.

The question isn't whether Obama is or isn't a Muslim. The question is, if he were a Muslim, what would he be doing differently? In a word: nothing.

Source

Pamela Geller's commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books

 

 


Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/02/enemy-white-house/#JF5Q12Om6kauOF5A.99
Entry #780
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

February 8, 2015, 5:49 pmSamsung: Don't discuss personal info in front of TV

LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER

Samsung: Don't discuss personal info in front of TV

Warns of voice captures being shared with 3rd party


brainwash_TV

Your SmartTV just might be smarter than you think.

Did you know someone might be listening on the other end of your TV?

Would you have guessed that many someones are indeed listening if you are using a voice-recognition SmartTV?

Convenience may come at the expense of privacy and security in the expanding world of interconnected devices and voice control recognition, cautions Samsung, which issues this warning on its SmartTVs: “Please be aware that if your spoken words include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be among the data captured and transmitted to a third party through your use of Voice Recognition.”

But how many are reading the fine print?

More such products are coming online every day – like Amazon’s connected speaker with a Siri-style assistant that can perform a variety of tasks including adding items to your e-commerce shopping basket.

“The potential privacy intrusion of voice-activated services is massive,” reports TechCrunch.com.

Electronic privacy activists are apoplectic about what’s already here and what’s on the horizon – comparing it to George Orwell’s Big Brother world of “1984.”

Where does this all lead?

The TechCrunch report concludes with this question: “When all the objects in your home have networked ears that are fine-tuned for commercial intelligence gathering, where will you go to talk about ‘personal’ or ‘sensitive’ stuff?”

 

 


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/samsung-dont-discuss-personal-info-in-front-of-tv/#PR0LieaIZoB1ljhx.99
Entry #779
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)

February 8, 2015, 1:55 pmTHE SMOKING GUN in the Obama Eligibility Case: Stanley Ann Dunham's Passpor

THE SMOKING GUN in the Obama Eligibility Case: Stanley Ann Dunham’s Passport

Sunday, February 8, 2015

WHAT’S HEARTBREAKING…

 IS THIS WILL NEVER MAKE THE EVENING NEWS….

We were right about EVERYTHING! Pick a subject, something liberals had a derogatory name for, and something they called us crazy about in 2008… pick anything… we were right on ALL of it. We have the most successful TERRORIST of all time sitting in the Oval Office. Hijack a plane? Heck, he took a country… and now, whether liberal or conservative, smart enough to see it coming, or probably not so much if you’re a liberal, YOUR kids and YOUR grandkids will pay for YOUR mistake. 

WHAT’S WORSE? 

WE’LL READ THIS, NOD, AND GO ABOUT OUR DAY…

I BET EVERYONE KNOWS WHO’S STILL LEFT ON THE BACHELOR…

OR AMERICAN IDOL… “BUT YOU DON’T HAVE TIME FOR THIS….”

THIS SHOULD BE THE PRICE!

1380607_236114249878877_752749417_n

WHEN DO WE OWN UP TO WHAT WE’VE DONE?

In a post dated June 20th titled:  OBAMA MUST BE ARRESTED & PROSECUTED FOR IMPERSONATING A PUBLIC OFFICER, the author goes into  GREAT detail about Barack Obama’s status as a  USURPER of the Presidency. As such, the author tells us Obama  CANNOT be impeached, because only a Lawful President can be Impeached. Obama was  NEVER qualified for the office of the President of the United States. Rather, Obama hijacked it. He is an  IMPOSTOR…  a charlatan. Even  OBAMA HIMSELF ADMITS THAT HE WAS BORN IN KENYA, but we’re long passed the point of being able to do anything about it. 

In 1979, an article was uncovered  WRITTEN BY VALERIE JARRETT’S FATHER-IN-LAW ABOUT A MUSLIM PLAN TO PURCHASE THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES.  If you  READ that  HORRIBLY disturbing article (that was written decades ago (and  LONG before the years of the Obama Debacle), does the claim by an Iranian Commander that  THE WHITE HOUSE IS ISIS HEADQUARTERS  really  seem  THAT outlandish?

Perhaps that alone isn’t enough. What about the  OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DOING NOTHING TO STOP KNOWN JIHAD TRAINING CAMPS right here in the United States? What about  FORMER CIA AGENTS COMING OUT AND SAYING OBAMA IS A “RADICAL ISLAMIST” AND ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES?

We have  FOUR STAR ADMIRALS WHO HAVE SAID OBAMA HAS CONSPIRED WITH THE ENEMY, other members of the  CIA CONFIRM OUR WORST FEARS ABOUT BARACK OBAMA, and  OBAMA’S INSISTENCE THAT AMERICAN SOLDIERS BE WILLING TO FIRE ON AMERICANS… does any of that concern you? Even the  NEW ARMY MANUAL DETAILS THE USE OF LETHAL FORCE ON U.S. CITIZENS EVEN THOSE PEACEFULLY PROTESTING!

AT WHAT POINT DO WE REALLY FACE THE FACTS OF WHAT WE’VE DONE?

WHEN DO AMERICANS TAKE OWNERSHIP OF OUR MISTAKE?

READ WHAT SENIOR CHIEF GEOFF ROSS WRITES ABOUT OBAMA’S SEALED PAST!

AS ALWAYS, THE MOST VALUABLE PART OF THE POST IS THE LINKS AT THE END!

Treason 5

While Barack Obama has taken numerous and expensive steps to keep his past secret (and yes, other presidents have did the same), one thing that cannot be missed is what may be the smoking gun in the eligibility case: The passport information of Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Obama’s mother. It has been said that young Barry went to Indonesia with his mother to live with Lolo Soetoro and in doing so, because of his age, he was placed on his mother’s passport. According to the documents obtained from the US State Department, under the Freedom of Information Act, Barack Hussein Obama’s name was stricken from the original application. According to the State Department, they “could not locate a 1965 passport application referenced in an application for amendment of passport that is included in the released documents.”

Why are these documents so important? Under US Passport laws, in order to add a child to one’s passport, they would simply have to have the child’s birth certificate and a photo of one’s self and the child so that they could be matched when boarding a plane for their destination.

Upon the release of Dunham’s passport files, they were examined and in her renewal application, dated August 13, 1968, she lists Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah). Obama would have been eight years old at the time, just about to turn nine.

However, if you take a look at the application, young Barry’s name is scratched out on page two of the application, which means he was not in the application for his mother’s passport renewal in 1967.

 

obama-passport-2

 

SO WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? CONSIDER A BREIF TIMELINE:

  • Stanley Ann Dunham allegedly married Barack Obama, Sr. in 1961.
  • Barack Obama, Jr. was allegedly born on August 4, 1961 to Stanley Ann Dunham
  • Later in August of the same year, Dunham moved to Washington to attend University of Washington
  • Obama, Sr. continued studies in Hawaii until June 1962 and then went to Harvard.
  • Dunham met Lolo Soetoro in 1963
  • Obama and Dunham divorced in March 1964
  • Soetoro and Dunham married in 1965 in Hawaii (according to P3 in the files obtained, but 1964 in P5)
  • Soetoro leaves Hawaii for Indonesia in 1966, leaving behind Dunham and little Barry
  • Dunham and Barry would travel to Indonesia in 1967
  • From ages 6-10 Obama was in school in Indonesia; first at a Catholic School where he was registered as a Muslim and then at Besuki School, one of the three best public schools in Indonesia. (Consider that Obama was labeled a citizen of Indonesia at the time and that it is extremely rare for non-Indonesians to go to Indonesian public school.)
  • Obama returned to Hawaii to live with grandparents in 1971

 

So, first let’s be honest here. Dunham had a passport that was valid at the time Obama took his first trip to Indonesia (1967). However, when she chose to renew the application (August 1968), she listed Obama and then scratched him out. Since records are not available for her initial passport application due to them being destroyed, one wonders if Obama was listed on the passport. For the sake of argument, I’ll assume he was. He’s in Indonesia for four years.

He then returned to Hawaii and attended Punahou School and meets his alleged father Barack Obama, Sr. for the only time in his life (by the way, they look nothing alike). Here’s where it seems there is a problem. Who did Obama travel with when he came back to the states? If it was his mother, consider that she had not properly listed him in her 1968 renewal application. She would have had to do this in order for Barry to travel with her to Indonesia.

The real kicker comes in her application dated June 1971. There is no listing for Barack Obama as her son on her passport. How is Barry getting from Indonesia to Hawaii now?

According to the man I was named after, who was a Christian missionary for decades to various parts of Indonesia beginning in 1967, he told me that he always had to list his children on his passport until they were 18. Then they could get their own passports. So why is Barack Obama, the son of Stanley Ann Dunham not listed on any of her passport applications? How was he able to travel to and from Indonesia?

The convenience of the 1965 passport records being destroyed is curious. For one might make the claim that there is a coverup (albeit circumstantial) regarding Obama’s presence in his younger days. Age 5-6 is when kids normally began school in the US. I assume it would be similar overseas, such as in Indonesia.

But the question remains that Soetoro never listed him as her son on future applications, even when he was ten years old, which would have been when he came to Hawaii and stayed.

Perhaps there is an explanation, but without previous travel records for Obama, we may never be able to get a definite answer.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) theorizes:

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10. This file indicates via the 1967 passport amendment application (document marked P3) that Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama had a passport for certain issued to her 1965 and she was applying to amend it. Thus, she had one for sure in 1965. Since a passport was good for 5 years, that means if the 1965 issued passport was a renewal that she likely got her first passport possibly as early as late 1960 or early 1961. How does that fit the narrative to explain the information coming out of Kenya that Obama was born there? Why did she need a passport at age 18? She would not need it to have a baby in Hawaii or to go to college in Seattle Washington. What was the real reason this pregnant teenager got a passport in late 1960 or early in 1961? I believe it was likely to be able to  travel to Kenya to have the baby over there where it was her intent to leave the baby there to be raised by the paternal family in Kenya. She was to then return to re-start her life as a young teenager going to college in Seattle Washington. And then when Stanley Ann did not follow the plan because maternal instincts kicked in and she returned to college in Seattle WITH the new baby, grandma Dunham had to take action and filed the fraudulent action in Hawaii to falsely register the baby as born at home there in Hawaii, with no witnesses, to get her newborn grandson U.S. Citizenship … because it was very easy to do this in Hawaii in 1961. Listen to the Bill Cunningham Radio Show for how it was likely done [continued below video]:

 

I grant that CDR Kerchner’s assumption that Dunham’s passport was obtained at eighteen is just that, an assumption. However, it is interesting that he links to a story with similar documentation that we have provided documentation in a  previous article as it relates to the Kenyan Parliament and the acknowledgment that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

Too many things don’t add up with Barack Hussein Obama: his selective service form, his social security number, his lack of being able to be verified to hold a job in the US and his birth certificate all point to a man who is a fraud and an illegal president.

So, I ask you, is this passport information the smoking gun in the Obama eligibility case? If so, what are people like Markwayne Mullins and a host of other elected officials doing by not pursuing this to verify the truth? I’ll tell you what they are doing. They are being complicit in this and looking out for what they perceive as their political futures, plain and simple. Demand your congressmen pursue this and present the truth to the American people.

Read the article at Freedom Outpost here:

 

THE VOICE OF REASON

Blank American Social Security Card

FOR LINKS ON OBAMA’S LACK OF ELIGIBILITY FOR PRESIDENT:

voteonce

FOR MORE ON OBAMA’S VOTER FRAUD:

Repair Kit

FOR MORE ON ALL OBAMA’S TREASONOUS ACTS!

Entry #778
View and Add Comments  (2 Comments)

February 6, 2015, 3:05 pmBreaking News! Obama Loses Texas Amnesty Courtcase (MSNBC)

Breaking News! Obama Loses Texas Amnesty Courtcase (MSNBC)

Friday, February 6, 2015

 

Obama’s toast.

Breaking news this morning: MSNBC admits the Judge of Texas Andrew Hanen will suspend Amnesty and Obama is defeated.

Spread the good news that all the little Obama bots have lost and their six year stand against the truth and law is over. 

The Bots can crawl back under the rock they crawled out from under.

Famous network MSNBC says the chances are slim of winning the courtcase in Texas where Judge Andrew Hanen will certainly suspend Obama’s Amnesty and infict a lethal blow to Obama’s already shaky hold on power.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/activists-prepare-the-worst-lawsuit-block-immigration-actions

Entry #777
View and Add Comments  (0 Comments)
Previous Page  Page  of 53  Next Page