Search

649 formulaReply
Mathhead, When you said, ...the article says exactly what I have been saying all along, namely: the only way to improve your odds is to purchase more tickets (lines). , you said it all! And your description of the roll down clinches it. This horse was beaten to death in April but these people are so desperate to prove we are wrong that they've picked up their clubs yet again. They apparently want people to believe that the syndicates that expoited the Roll Down were using previous dr
Jun 12, 2013, 12:57 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Wave pattern analysis and lottery draw historiesReply
CARBOB says, The Spainiard disproves nothing about Benfords law. I'm surprised you didn't go here http://www.dspguide.com/ch34/8.htm Please read the physorg article again. The data from the Spaniard National Institute of Statistics shows clearly how certain data follows Benford's Law. If you look at the small diamonds in their graph forming a horizontal line, you will see that THE LOTTERY DOES NOT FOLLOW BENFORD'S LAW! I followed your link to dspguide and found that they agree
Apr 8, 2011, 10:40 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

5/39 on EVEN/ODDs and PatternsReply
LOL, Jimmy it isn't a problem finding ways to sort data. The minds here at Lottery Post never run out of possibilities. But I like your suggestion. Originally I wrote a sort program to answer to answer one question, which led to programming a baseline for the entire set. But sometimes the answers leave you with more questions. And once it was established where the numbers fell from each subset, the progression led to EVEN/ODD combinations. And all that is good and well, I'm actually having s
Nov 14, 2010, 4:42 am - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Math Matrices been the engine of a RNG seed...Reply
this is different but i am going to mention it i was surfing the net and i read this: http://dspdesignline.com/howto/214502487 In this article we present an implementation of 4x4 complex matrix inversion on the recently announced StarCore SC3850 DSP core. We use the cofactor method and optimize our code to take advantage of parallelism in the SC3850 architecture, resulting in a highly efficient implementation. We discuss the implementation in detail, including code structure and optimizat
Apr 12, 2010, 4:25 pm - pumpi76 - Mathematics Forum

Tinkermen Lotto Report - General Explanation of Mathematical Discovery neededReply
The was no condemnation. There was no accusation of freeloading. But as you say life's experience has taught (you) to see and hear what you want (same as everyone else). If he's convinced you he was accosted, condemned and called a freeloader, so be it. I said I would ask hard questions, and I asked the hard questions. And you see how he only started feeling sorry for himself and playing to your pity when he wouldn't answer the questions and the questions wouldn't go away. (For all any of
May 15, 2019, 11:48 am - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Tinkermen Lotto Report - General Explanation of Mathematical Discovery neededReply
Mr-B, G and Cottoneyedjoe, I am very humbled today by our discussion and with what you ve all openly shared with me thus far and I m so very grateful and appreciated of your time by this discussion. Please give me the benefit of the doubt here and allow me some more time to process (I m partially in full on total shock to learn of all of this in this manner) and allow me some more time to move forward with my initial train of thought. I would like to honor both LP and all its members and T
May 10, 2019, 3:45 pm - Tinkermen - Mathematics Forum

Markov Chains in Lottery GamesReply
RJ I came away from the article with the opinion that expert lotto offered no mathematical advantage. Every lottery system I have ever tested relies on some type of conditional element. If the elements are factored back in then the we will wind up back where we started. Some software's require the user to make choices while others make choices for us but in the end nothing will ever move us any closer to a JP win unless we are able to calculate the seed value for RNG based draws.
Nov 9, 2014, 6:06 pm - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

Odds of winning.Reply
You cut out some. The odds against a random day being a Sunday are 6 : 1. If I translate it to the opposite, that would be 1:6 or 1/6. There you get a conflict in comprehension and putting things right. The chance that a random day is not Sunday, or just the chance that any day is not a Sunday. 1-1/7 = 6/7. p(!Sunday)=6/7 6/7 is correct for mathematicians. A douzaine pays two to one, the dealer pushes two chips against one winning chip. There also is a nice article about b
Aug 21, 2013, 8:42 pm - SergeM - Mathematics Forum

Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
Stack47, Your description of this old system raises more questions than it answers. If you refer to the code I posted in the Backtesting Thread recently, you will be in a much better position to program a simulation of it than me, since you seem to be familiar with it. Besides, you're asking the wrong questions. When you make a request like, Show us if this system can't beat chance with 6 hits or can't show a profit by with 11 hits., it's not clear what you're asking for. This system
May 10, 2011, 12:57 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

MATH 5/39: Stack47, Garyo1954, RL-RANDOMLOGIC VS Jimmy4164Reply
Stack47, Your post above explains in detail areas where we differ in our understanding of certain aspects of the probability of choosing 5 objects from 39 without replacement. However, the fact that I think you're wrong [in part] does not mean I think you are a stupid person. I'm not stupid either. Based on what I've read of your postings here, you appear to have above average intelligence. The same goes for the others in your crew. You're mistaken when you assume I don't respect your intelli
Mar 4, 2011, 12:55 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum