Search

The Implications of Cracking the Code..Reply
I'm intentionally going overboard here ... but hypothetically speaking ... what if someone has already discovered a phenomenon naturally present within randomly occurring numbers that allows all future drawings to be predicted in advance with an unvarying and permanently-sustainable 100% accuracy rate throughout and this person understands how it works ... and let's say that this person wants to reveal it to the world at large [just because its such an impressive phenomenon and for the sake of b
Nov 30, 2007, 3:56 pm - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

The Implications of Cracking the Code..Reply
Hi Stack47. Not sure, but I think maybe what I was referring to is being misunderstood. I was referring to the possibility of some kind of objective information naturally-present within randomly-occurring numbers that could allow for correct future predictions [which is the kind of thing that I thought was being called a code ] and was not making any reference to the lottery creating a code to benefit players. Apparently I have been misunderstanding what the use of the term code ac
Nov 28, 2007, 5:02 pm - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

The Implications of Cracking the Code..Reply
I am certainly not going to make a claim at this particular moment that I can prove the existence of a code [or any similarly unlikely phenomenon] within the Pick 3 and 4 and other type lottery games, but I am interested in what would happen if someone *did* actually prove the existence of such an unlikely thing to the world at large. Would you then believe in it tapper or do you think you might would continue to deny it for a time even in the face of irrefutable proof? And in finally
Nov 28, 2007, 2:37 pm - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

The Implications of Cracking the Code..Reply
Without meaning to put you on the spot pumpi76, I would like to ask you exactly what you mean by the term code ? I would assume that you mean some kind of intelligible real information present in past random number results that somehow actually allows for the correct anticipation of future drawings ahead of time. Is that the correct interpretation for your particular use of the term? I just wanted clarification on exactly what you yourself meant in using that particular word with regard
Nov 28, 2007, 2:08 pm - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

The Implications of Cracking the Code..Reply
With all due respect [and without meaning to appear combative] you would atually have to prove that there *isn't* a code before you could make the statement that there isn't a code.
Nov 28, 2007, 1:25 pm - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

The Implications of Cracking the Code..Reply
Backed myself into a tight corner right away, didn't I? I should have asked you: How can you be so certain that there is no code [or a similar phenomenon] present inside genuinely random numbers? Seems a good question from my end, so I *am* asking it: How can you be so certain?
Nov 28, 2007, 11:51 am - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

The Implications of Cracking the Code..Reply
That's why it can't be broken - it doesn't exist. You're wrong.
Nov 28, 2007, 10:47 am - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

What if you find out ...no System "works" ?Reply
What if you finally find out that there is no System that works? What if you find out that there is nothing that gets you close ......except for the plain old math averages . *** Not to reopen an old and mildly unpleasant can of worms , but the phenomenon would allow a person to quite literally predict the daily/pick 3 and 4 type games correctly 100% of time without failure. Genuinely random numbers occurring in multiple columns are actually intelligent* progressions always formin
Aug 16, 2007, 11:59 am - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

Not Afraid To Try A PredictionReply
This evening's actual WV Cash 3 was: BCA (672) I know that for many of you close does not count (and I generally agree with that), but I want credit anyway for being close: the left and right columns were called correctly and for me I know that I was at least on the right track. I'll leave it to each of you to judge whether or not I was on the right track. It is possible I am premature with this one as well. Look to see if it just happens to come in with the next appearance of a B in
Apr 24, 2007, 8:00 pm - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum

Not Afraid To Try A PredictionReply
Ah, jeez man... either I'm reading this correctly or I ain't... Actual drawing was: BBB (445) No excuses offered with this dismal failure. ... I would like to assert that one of these scenarios is a certainty along the way: * The first appearance of an A in the left column will be accompanied by a B in the middle column. * The first appearance of a B in the middle column will be accompanied by an A in the left column. (This one is invalid now based on what actually came up.)
Apr 24, 2007, 8:00 pm - Grumple Dumple - Lottery Discussion Forum