You last visited May 25, 2013, 10:12 am All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Lotto System Development SimplifiedPennsylvania United States Member #93975 July 10, 2010 1840 Posts Offline | | Posted: January 22, 2013, 5:05 pm - IP Logged | |
Hello, jimmy, I agree with much that the donald writes, but also we have to see we are trying to find a 100% of a lottery scheme, where in Lottery can only come with holding of 3 to 4 numbers (Lotto 6/40 a) or similar The rest is random, this is crucial, we provide two pairs of ends What are 4 numbers, or also dismembered the result of 6 numbers in 15 positions of 4 numbers each, that is a good way to predict 4 numbers and not the 6 numbers, What is missing after is completed, this is our sin, trying to predict the 6 numbers "The rest is random,..." Unless the draws are being made by a computer programmed by larcenous programmers, it's ALL random. If larceny is involved, do you really think the programmers would do it in a way that would allow anyone other than themselves to know what results to expect? | | |
bgonçalves Brasil Member #92592 June 9, 2010 1137 Posts Online | | Posted: January 22, 2013, 5:24 pm - IP Logged | |
Hello, well, if we're being fooled by sweepstakes, Oh Let's walk in circle, jimmy, beware of google translation, it google, reverses synonyms, When I speak the rest is random, I'm referring to the central pair of 40/6 Yes because after the frequency statistics, the best pairs of each end (the smaller and larger pair) etc. are chosen, can give clues of the missing pair i.e. the random pair, The central pair, example after choosing pairs of extremities see couples who haven't came out with them (they are smaller and larger pairs) or random (the central pair pair for delay in position for this to get a very good reduction | | |
Pennsylvania United States Member #93975 July 10, 2010 1840 Posts Offline | | Posted: January 23, 2013, 1:10 pm - IP Logged | |
Hello, jimmy, I agree with much that the donald writes, but also we have to see we are trying to find a 100% of a lottery scheme, where in Lottery can only come with holding of 3 to 4 numbers (Lotto 6/40 a) or similar The rest is random, this is crucial, we provide two pairs of ends What are 4 numbers, or also dismembered the result of 6 numbers in 15 positions of 4 numbers each, that is a good way to predict 4 numbers and not the 6 numbers, What is missing after is completed, this is our sin, trying to predict the 6 numbers dr san, "...this is our sin, trying to predict the 6 numbers" Yes, something may be lost in the translation. Tell me if I understand what you are suggesting above. In several of my very early posts I stated that it was possible to choose selection methods which could "spread out" your winnings with smaller wins over longer periods of time. For example, if it's your pleasure to buy 10 $1 Pick-3 Straight tickets per day, you have choices for selection: 1) You could buy 10 identical tickets every day. 2) You could select 10 different numbers of your own design, or buy 10 Quick Picks. Now, if you choose option 1), WHEN you win, you will win big, $5000. However, you can only expect this to happen every 1000 draws, on average, or about every 3 years. Choosing option 2), your wins will only be $500, but you can expect to get them 10 times as often, or about every 3 months, on average. As is often said, "You pays your money and you takes your choice." Of course, as I've shown recently with simulations in a thread in the Discussion Forum, because of the deviations caused by the randomness of the process, it is quite possible for individuals to win far more than $5000 over 3 years, purely by chance. (This why we play!) Unfortunately, it is also possible for individuals to do far worse, as well! If this is what you mean in your post above, then I agree with that part of it. What I do NOT agree with is that any of the 6 numbers can be predicted. --Jimmy4164 | | |
Pennsylvania United States Member #93975 July 10, 2010 1840 Posts Offline | | Posted: January 23, 2013, 1:19 pm - IP Logged | |
The probability of selecting a winning pair using subsets is: conditional on all the winning numbers being in the subset. --RJOh Thanks RJOh, I'm sure your verbal descriptive summary of my calculations will help many to understand this better. --Jimmy4164 | | |
bgonçalves Brasil Member #92592 June 9, 2010 1137 Posts Online | | Posted: January 23, 2013, 1:46 pm - IP Logged | |
Hello, jimmy, my intention is to predict, forecast the smaller pairs and couples over a lottery, let's take a lottery 5/39, as example Starting from 01 to 14 = we have 91 smaller pairs and 26 to 39 have 91 major pairs Getting a number to close betting, goal is to hit 4 of 5 numbers, In a lottery can only go up to 60% mathematically 70% the rest on Let's get it right Goal is to hit the end of the 39/5, good without a filter we have 91 pairs You can create filters for the best pair in late position etc. ... to decrease from 91 to Some 15 to 20 pairs, so tambvem with peers, coming to the 15th 20 pairs, then come join the smaller and larger pairs, this falatando a number, is the central number, the pairs can give indications of the number, you can be with the number that never left etc or by other statistics, this will reduce a lot of conbinaçaço in a lottery 5/39 | | |
Pennsylvania United States Member #93975 July 10, 2010 1840 Posts Offline | | Posted: January 23, 2013, 1:57 pm - IP Logged | |
Sorry dr san, We are NOT on the same page. Você não pode tirar sangue de um nabo! --Jimmy4164 | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 15968 Posts Offline | | Posted: January 27, 2013, 12:00 pm - IP Logged | |
Sorry dr san, We are NOT on the same page. Você não pode tirar sangue de um nabo! --Jimmy4164 Almost everyone at Lottery Post is on their own page, that's what makes LP so interesting. * The fundamentals of winning a lottery jackpot *
* play a lottery you can win *
| | |
KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE BALL! NYC United States Member #124503 March 14, 2012 5053 Posts Offline | | Posted: January 27, 2013, 3:55 pm - IP Logged | |
Hello, well, if we're being fooled by sweepstakes, Oh Let's walk in circle, jimmy, beware of google translation, it google, reverses synonyms, When I speak the rest is random, I'm referring to the central pair of 40/6 Yes because after the frequency statistics, the best pairs of each end (the smaller and larger pair) etc. are chosen, can give clues of the missing pair i.e. the random pair, The central pair, example after choosing pairs of extremities see couples who haven't came out with them (they are smaller and larger pairs) or random (the central pair pair for delay in position for this to get a very good reduction why dont you try the microsoft bing translator? maybe it is better? est modus in rebus --- Catch the Lightning! He deals the cards to find the answer, the S. G. of chance, the hidden law of a probable outcome, the numbers lead a dance. - Sting. | | |
|