Search

What do you know about "normal statistical distribution"?Reply
Fraud, isn't that slander, or is your brain in a fog? Put your jealousy aside grow up and cocentrate on winning.
May 15, 2018, 7:23 pm - lakerben - Mathematics Forum

Statistical Analysis of Lottery ResultsReply
four4me, Statistical analysis when referring to the lottery could yield many results but it's unclear if it could produce future wins. This has been my point all along! Mathematics and physics will not allow you to turn a lottery game into a profitable venture. The only possible exception to this would be where fraud is involved, and it is highly likely that only the perpetrators of the fraud would benefit. --Jimmy4164
Oct 17, 2010, 12:53 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Indiana, RNGs & Allegations: Time to Test
We've all read the numerous posts about the Hoosier Lottery's use of RNGs. Most people seem to think that there's something crooked going on. I'll have to admit that I at first thought all the charges of fraud were altogether groundless. After looking at the payouts on Indiana's daily games, I began to think that there was perhaps some substance to accusations made against the Hoosier Lottery. Now, I'm thinking that the lottery games in Indiana simply aren't very popular. That would very easily
Apr 17, 2005, 3:18 pm - ayenowitall - Mathematics Forum

Nature of Randomness in Mechanical SystemsReply
The notion that collisions of balls in a lotto machine can be predicted such that some advantage can be gained in a fair game is utterly nonsensical. It defies all logic and reason. Now, if there were to be fraud, such that certain balls intentionally had heavier weights, that's a different story. However, I have never heard of that been shown to happen in any State-run lottery, ever.
Feb 5, 2024, 8:38 pm - Orange71 - Mathematics Forum

Possible lotto formulaReply
lamaka10 Kiss my arz!!! how about that.have I tried to hustle anyone on this board out of money?No. All I have been doing is providing free information.Figure it out yourself.FRAUD THAT.
Dec 20, 2016, 3:26 am - Lottotree12 - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
I don't believe the 6 [ out of 66 ] drawings above are any indication of what will happen in the future unless the programmers in TN are engaged in fraud. However, if you believe these draws are harbingers of things to come, then what are you saying about the other 60?
Mar 7, 2011, 4:54 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

How do I prove my state lottery's CGNs are fixed?Reply
I'm working on making fraud detection a part of JADE LSG 2.0. That way anyone can number crunch themselves. This is just a test run of a few detection methods.
Apr 29, 2008, 2:53 pm - JADELottery - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
How would you know the difference even if the details of the computer program were known? I remember reading papers describing methods to calculate a randomness score of sets of variables to determine which set was the most random. However, I just put measures of randomness into the Google search box, and got tired trying to find what I vaguely remember. Try it - maybe you can find something useful. The data is available here at LP to enable one to compare the results of ball drops and c
Mar 18, 2011, 6:58 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

PI method Aaron C Donhaue 3 digit what is xx ?Reply
Well, that was certainly an interesting topic to revisit. Looks like Aaron C. Donahue is now going by the name of Aaron C. Hanson. He shared his latest Pick3 predictions on his blog back in July 2011. His first two predictions (20 to 24 numbers per draw) for Pennsylvania failed in which case he announced he was off on a lengthy training tour for a tanscontinental bike ride planned for 2012. He followed that up with two predictions for Maryland which also failed. There he quotes the formula as x/
Jan 23, 2012, 12:54 am - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

5/39 on EVEN/ODDs and PatternsReply
garyo1954, After a quick perusal of your post above, I was ready to post a full I Agree to the whole thing. Then I read more slowly and found, An inordinate amount of Evens or Odds, or Highs or Lows in a certain position has to mean a coming change. Now why did you have to go and say that? With the exception of that sentence, most mathematics professors would agree with your entire post! I found this post while scanning for another one that might be in this thread where I think someone re
Nov 17, 2010, 2:18 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum