Search

Keno method and strategiesReply
actually it would be one less odds after each number
Dec 15, 2013, 3:03 pm - helpmewin - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpotReply
But I thought you posted them because they had BETTER ODDS of winning.
Apr 17, 2013, 12:19 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpotReply
I had BETTER ODDS picking from the top 12 hotties.
Apr 17, 2013, 11:48 am - Ronnie316 - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpotReply
The same math that's being preached means there is not difference in the odds against winning whether the same amount of sets of numbers are chosen by the player, picked by an RNG, fortune cookies, or any other method. I see no reason to argue when someone says their set has better odds because they can't have worse odds.
Apr 6, 2013, 4:10 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Systems Forum

Pretty Close Pick 3 SystemReply
I played the nubmers but the odds I would win twice in one day...
Feb 11, 2013, 10:30 pm - manual - Lottery Systems Forum

Would you share your winning lottery system if you had one ?Reply
There will always be an element of luck in a system. At best I think a winning system is only going to shift the odds in your favor to a big degree and will never predict the exact winning numbers. For example in Mega Millions the normal odds of winning a Jackpot are 175 million to one. I think I have a system that roughtly reduces those odds to 7.5 million to one at this point. Those are still very LONG odds and I'm still a LONG way from winning but I would never play if the odds were really
May 18, 2012, 3:51 pm - mega-mega - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing pick 4 for added incomeReply
Your odds are better playing 24 quick-picks every night if you had the bankroll.
Apr 12, 2012, 6:44 pm - ogivens15 - Lottery Systems Forum

Odds on MisinformationReply
There are also odds for the order of appearance.
Mar 15, 2012, 9:08 pm - SergeM - Lottery Systems Forum

Odds on Misinformation
Much misinformation has been posted about the odds of winning the lotto with specific strategies. A common mistake, seen many times, promotes the false idea that the odds of winning the lotto by selecting a sequence of numbers (2, 3, 4, 5, 6; 7) is lower than selecting non-sequenced numbers (8, 15, 24, 31, 48; 5). This idea is false. Any numbers you pick, sequenced or not, have exactly the same probability of winning. This statistical fact seems to be counter intuitive to many people. I ve seen
Mar 12, 2012, 7:30 pm - Cautious - Lottery Systems Forum

Silver Lotto Pro System?Reply
So cover master does work to improve your odds of winning?
Dec 18, 2011, 6:27 am - Luminous - Lottery Systems Forum