CajunWin4's Blog

Obama eligibility appeal in Roy Moore's court

Newly elected state chief justice has expressed doubt about  qualification

Many cases challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have come and  gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly  elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama’s qualification for  office.

Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last  November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments  monument from the state Supreme Court building.

Now, 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama  Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state’s highest court to  force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the  state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.

Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial  Watch and now head of Freedom  Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for  oral arguments.

“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the  Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.

Klayman says he and his team “have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and  his integrity and legal acumen.”

“He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”

The case is an appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court.

In his brief, Klayman says “credible evidence and information from an  official source” was presented to Chapman before the election indicating Obama  might not have been qualified for Oval Office.

The complaint argues Chapman failed her constitutional duty as secretary of  state to verify the eligibility of candidates.

Moore is on the record questioning Obama’s eligibility.

In an interview with WND in  2010, he defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that President Obama prove  his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment  orders.

Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a natural-born  citizen and much evidence that suggests he is not.

Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions  under the Constitution, he has a duty.”

“And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in  violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.

‘Affirmative duty’

Klayman asserts the secretary of state “has an affirmative duty that stems  from her oath of office under both the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions, to  protect the citizens from fraud and other misconduct by candidates.”

As a result of her refusal to investigate the qualifications of candidates  for president, Klayman says, “a person believed to be unqualified for that  office has been elected.”

The remedy, he said, “is to require each candidate to do what every teenager  is required to do to get a learner’s permit.”

“It is to produce a bona fide birth certificate … and the Secretary of State  is the official to cause that to happen.”

McInnish is a member of the Madison County Republican Executive Committee and  also sits on the state Republican Executive Committee.

Citing the investigation of Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold  Case Posse, Klayman says Chapman “gained knowledge from an official source that  there was probable cause to believe the Barack Obama had not met a certifying  qualification.”

The appeal brief notes McInnish visited the secretary of state’s office Feb.  2, 2012, and spoke with the deputy secretary of state, Emily Thompson, in  Chapman’s absence.

Thompson, the brief says, “represented that her office would not investigate  the legitimacy of any candidate, thus violating her duties under the U.S. and  Alabama Constitutions.”

As WND  reported, Arpaio and his team concluded that Obama’s long-form birth  certificate was a computer-generated forgery.

Klayman, in a previous brief, argued the secretary of state, “having the  power to certify candidates, can surely de-certify – in effect disqualify – them  if they are found to be ineligible.”

In his new appeal, Klayman points, as an example, to California Secretary of  State Debra Bowen’s rejection of Petra Lindsay on the 2012 California primary  ballot because she was 27 years old. The U.S. Constitution requires the  president to be at least 35.

In his conclusion, Klayman argues the fact that the election is over does not  make the case moot.

“It would be paradoxical beyond measure if the real and grave question of the  legitimacy of the de facto President, a question which lies at the very heart of  our American Constitutional Government, were left unresolved for want of the  simplest of documents, a birth certificate.”

If either a bona fide birth certificate is produced or an admission is made  that it does not exist, he writes, “this most important of legal questions will  have been answered, the purity of Alabama’s ballot maintained, and the anxiety  of Alabama citizens stilled.”

If the issue is not resolved, he said, citizens will be left with the  impression “that their government was dysfunctional and has ignored their real  concerns.

‘Certain documentation’

In an earlier step in the case one year ago, before a panel of Alabama  Supreme Court justices, one justice raised doubts about Obama’s eligibility.

The justices denied a  petition filed by McInnish seeking to require Obama submit an original birth  certificate before he could be placed on the state’s 2012 ballot.

Justice Tom Parker filed a  special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges  of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern.

“Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which,  if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary  presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the  ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein  Obama that have been made public.”

The “certain documentation” is the findings of Arpaio’s investigation.

“The Alabama Constitution implies that this court is without jurisdiction  over McInnish’s original petition,” Parker explained. “The office of the  secretary of state of Alabama is not a ‘court of inferior jurisdiction’ that  this court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a  petition.”

Now, however, the case is coming from a lower court.

‘Obama violated the Constitution’

Moore told  WND in an interview after his election last November that the country must  return to a standard in which the rule of law prevails over politics.

He said Obama violated the Constitution when he bombed Libya, because the  Constitution stipulates only Congress shall declare war.

“No president has the power to violate constitutional restraints of power,”  Moore said.

“The Constitution is the rule of law, and [my job is] to uphold the rule of  law.”

Government’s job, Moore said, is to secure and protect those rights.

“There is little regard for the Constitution in the courts today, even the  U.S. Supreme Court.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/obama-eligibility-appeal-in-roy-moores-court/#vI40CRzuWQV0mTPC.99

OBAMA RAPE AND PLUNDER OF AMERICA

By            Dr. Laurie Roth           March 29, 2013   

All           that Americans have held on to and relied on is being assaulted. Obama           won’t stop until America is forced into submission to his Dictatorship           plans and the rest of us locked up or killed. What survives the Obama           battering rams will be taxed and redistributed to his seduced worshipers.           They will be slaves and controlled like mutant little toys but they           will thank Obama and give him their worship.

How           many ways can a mad man in the White House attack the American people,           her laws, freedoms and Constitution? Obama and his minions have favorite           attack -- assault weapons with very large magazines.

Executive           Orders

Obama           has issued at least 139 executive orders before he started his second           term of horror. All are designed to fuel and support his growing and           corrupt dictatorship. From the beginning of his regime he has taken           over the private sector and attempted to crush state and local rights           with these orders. A recent one merges the Federal Government with the           private sector. He has built the Saul Alinsky reasons for his “kill           lists” “emergency powers” “martial law this           and that.”

These           Executive Orders control literally everything you can even imagine.           EVERYTHING – where you work -- what you eat -- when and if you           travel -- what you have and get to keep in the bank -- when the curfew           sends you home – what you say and can’t say and how you           can or can’t protect yourself. Obama’s executive orders           are a complete Dictatorship manual in everyway, hiding behind the ‘go           switch’ of terrorism, economic collapse and other fabricated crises.           

Partnerships            – Code for Government controlling everything. The feds will have           complete control down to the local level. Forget 10th amendment and           States rights. Forget your Constitutional rights and right to privacy.           They are burnt pieces of toast now. Lined up to help enforce all these           acts of ‘executive’ terror against Americans is the already           voted into law NDAA Bill, which will turn the US military on the people,           denying us of Miranda rights and detaining us indefinitely without recourse.           

DHS

Obama           has his ‘SS’ firmly in place and has been building his private           army since 2008. He warned us with his own words back in 2008.

“We           cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the           national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve gotta           have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful,           just as strong, just as well funded as the United States military”            -Candidate Barack Obama, 2008.

Over           the past few years we have watched the DHS buy up 1.6 billion rounds           of ammunition, weapons systems, 7,000 armored personnel carriers and           more. They have become Obama’s private army with unheard of drones           flying overhead to apparently support their attacks on the “terrorist”            American people.

Senator           Rand Paul dared to stand up and filibuster for 13 hours talking of the           Constitutional breach of drones flying overhead targeting Americans.           He was mocked and rebuked by GOP establishment but the country went           wild. Bravo to him.

This           week I saw another bold stand of courage and honor with Terry           M. Hestilow, a retired Army officer with 30 years experience. He           wrote a bold letter addressed to Senator John Cornyn. I was so thrilled           when I read his letter. It was what I have been screaming on my national           radio show for months. I and most of the citizens in the country have           been begging for any real response from the House and the Senate.

Please           read it for yourself and pray it snaps the House and Senate out of their           compromised and cowardly behavior. We are in a national emergency with           this violator Obama, who is not even qualified to be President. It is           critical that congress and the top military brass take action quickly           or there will be nothing left.

It           is most clear that the DHS is on a war mission with its unheard of purchases           of weapons and ammo. This sea of attack weapons and resources is complimented           by thousands of drones flying overhead. They are ready to pounce at           Obama’s cue.

The           house of cards is being built beautifully. Obama has the shield of the           NDAA Bill and the weapon of his contorted DHS, now his armed SS.

Attack           on Health care and control of bank accounts

To           complete the process of transformation and annihilation, Obama has his           Obama care bill in place run by the IRS. This will give him total access           to our accounts and literal control over who lives and dies. As in the           days of Adolph Hitler, Obama must control our bank accounts and health           care. Lifespan has its limits you know and Obama intends to remind us           of that.

EPA           control

While           Obama builds his army and violates our health care and accounts, he           is destroying our energy systems. The EPA has issued regulatory hell           attacks at the Coal and Fracking industries. Carbon controls are strangling           businesses from shore to shore, while our oil industry isn’t even           separating from water in a glass these days. Obama mocks our energy           systems and has said he always wanted high gas prices.

Moral           attacks

From           the beginning Obama has been the most abortion supportive president           ever in our history. He promotes it, funds it and pushes it down everyone’s           throat. Now Obama care forces us all to pay for abortions whether we           believe in them or not. The Catholic Church and other providers are           forced to deliver abortions and supportive services or else they receive           lawsuits, regulatory and legal attacks by the Obama administration.

Obama           has been busy pushing God and the Holy Bible out of our schools, culture           and families right from the beginning of his evil rule. Now, we have           2 cases being reviewed on ‘gay marriage’ in the Supreme           Court. The last few years Obama finally stopped the lie he ran on being           supportive of marriage between a man and a woman. Now, he is officially           for gay marriage and pushing that down our throats.

God           help us if the Supreme Court votes against families, God, states rights           and marriage. Literally, all hell will break lose, giving Obama more           areas to attack and slaughter people. Pastors will be arrested for hate           crimes if they quote the wrong scriptures. Government will dictate their           vision and ministries. Who will stand? School curriculums will not only           be rewritten but our children will be completely indoctrinated and perverted           by all kinds of sexual acting out on display. Parents will have nothing           to say about it. Media would have to shut up or be fined and arrested           due to speaking ‘hate crimes.’ A ‘moral’s horror           show is on its way, orchestrated by Obama. Government and Obama intend           to be God and Jesus and the Holy Bible are in the way.

Obama           is no Christian as he says. He is a new age – Islamic hater of           Christ and the Holy Bible. He also has an extensive and documented ‘gay’            background in Chicago by numerous sources and witnesses. These attributes           are Obama’s real legacy. Obama and his plans must be stopped.           Join me each day on my show from 7-10pm PAC at: www.therothshow.com.

Obama: We’re Not Taking Away Anyone’s Gun Rights

Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/20373/barack-obama-were-not-taking-away-anyones-gun-rights/#ixzz2OxSCe4c0

Jay Carney: Local Sheriffs Had Better Enforce Gun  Control Law

by Philip Hodges

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/03/jay-carney-local-sheriffs-had-better-enforce-gun-control-laws/#ixzz2OxQpblpV

Obama Administration Seeks To Nullify The  Nullifier 

by Philip Hodges

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/03/obama-administration-seeks-to-nullify-the-nullifiers/#ixzz2OrTDiLzW

Pelosi Flubs Attempt to Bash Republicans on Gay Marriage     

Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/pelosi-flubs-attempt-to-bash-republicans-on-gay-marriage/#ixzz2OrSWphEE

Did Hillary commit perjury?

New reports may contradict former secretary’s sworn  testimony

TEL AVIV – Did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton commit perjury when  she claimed in a Senate hearing that she did not know whether the U.S. mission  in Libya was procuring or transferring weapons to Turkey and other Arab  countries?

The goal of the alleged weapons shipments was to arm the rebels fighting  Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

Any training or arming of the Syrian rebels would be considered highly  controversial. A major issue is the inclusion of jihadists, including al-Qaida,  among the ranks of the Free Syrian Army and other Syrian opposition groups

During the recent hearings over the Obama administration’s handling of the  Sept. 11, 2012, attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Clinton was directly  asked about alleged U.S. weapons shipments out of Libya.

Clinton  claimed she did not know whether the U.S. was aiding Turkey and other Arab  countries in procuring weapons.

The exchange took place with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

Paul asked Clinton: “Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of weapons,  transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out  of Libya?”

“To Turkey?” Clinton asked. “I will have to take that question for the  record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.”

Continued Paul: “It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from  Libya and that may have weapons, and what I’d like to know is the annex that was  close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons,  and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any  countries, Turkey included?”

Clinton replied, “Well, Senator, you’ll have to direct that question to the  agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is available.”

“You’re saying you don’t know?” asked Paul.

“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

Clinton’s claims seem to now be unraveling.

Confirming WND’s exclusive reporting for over a year, the  New York Times earlier this week reported that since early 2012, the CIA has  been aiding Arab governments and Turkey in obtaining and shipping weapons to the  Syrian rebels.

Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND have said U.S.-aided  weapons shipments go back more than a year, escalating before the Sept. 11,  2012, attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi.

In fact, the Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND since last  year describe the U.S. mission in Benghazi and nearby CIA annex attacked last  September as an intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels in  the Middle East, particularly those fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s  regime.

The aid, the sources stated, included weapons shipments and was being  coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

The specifics of the New York Times reporting, meanwhile, open major holes in  Clinton’s sworn claims to be in the dark about the alleged weapons  shipments.

U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity told the Times that  American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons  and then helped to vet rebel commanders and groups to determine who should  receive the weapons as they arrive.

The plan mirrors one the  Times reported last month in a separate article that was proposed by Clinton  herself. The Times described Clinton as one of the driving forces advocating for  arming the Syrian rebels.

Last month, the New York Times reported Clinton and then-CIA Director David  Petraeus had concocted a plan calling for vetting rebels and arming Syrian  fighters with the assistance of Arab countries.

The Times report from earlier this week of U.S. arms shipments and vetting  seems to be the Clinton-Petraeus plan put in action.

It may be difficult for most to believe the secretary of state was not aware  that her alleged plan was being implemented, especially when arming the Syrian  rebels is a serious policy with obvious major repercussions internationally.

Clinton is not the only one in hot water.

As WND  reported yesterday, the New York Times report threatens the longstanding  White House narrative that claims the Obama administration has only supplied  nonlethal aid to the rebels.

The White House has repeatedly denied directly arming the rebels.

Recruiting jihadists

Days after the Benghazi attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher  Stevens, WND  broke the story that Stevens himself played a central role in recruiting  jihadists to fight Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian and other  Middle Eastern security officials.

Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment  by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists  were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad’s forces, said the security  officials.

The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of  potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found  to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq  and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria,  said the officials.

The latest New York Times report has bolstered WND’s reporting, citing air  traffic data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of  rebel commanders describing how the CIA has been working with Arab governments  and Turkey to sharply increase arms shipments to Syrian rebels in recent  months.

The Times reported that the weapons airlifts began on a small scale in early  2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanding into a steady and  much heavier flow late last year, the data shows.

The Times further revealed that from offices at “secret locations,” American  intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons,  including a large procurement from Croatia. They have vetted rebel commanders  and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive.

The CIA declined to comment to the Times on the shipments or its role in  them.

The Times quoted a former American official as saying that David H. Petraeus,  the CIA director until November, had been instrumental in helping set up an  aviation network to fly in the weapons. The paper said Petraeus had prodded  various countries to work together on the plan.

Petraeus did not return multiple emails from the Times asking for  comment.

Both WND’s reporting, which first revealed the U.S.-coordinated arms  shipments, and the Times reporting starkly contrast with statements from top  U.S. officials who have denied aiding the supply of weapons to the rebels.

Rebel training

It’s not the first time WND’s original investigative reporting on U.S.  support for the Syrian rebels was later confirmed by reporting in major media  outlets. Other WND reporting indicates support for the Syrian rebels that goes  beyond supplying arms, painting a larger picture of U.S. involvement in the  Middle East revolutions.

A story by the German weekly Der Spiegel earlier this month reporting the  U.S. is training Syrian rebels in Jordan was exclusively exposed  by WND 13 months ago.

Quoting what it said were training participants and organizers, Der Spiegel  reported it was not clear whether the Americans worked for private firms or were  with the U.S. Army, but the magazine said some organizers wore uniforms.

The training in Jordan reportedly focused on use of anti-tank weaponry.

The German magazine reported some 200 men received the training over the  previous three months amid U.S. plans to train a total of 1,200 members of the  Free Syrian Army in two camps in the south and the east of Jordan.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper also reported U.S. trainers were aiding Syrian  rebels in Jordan along with British and French instructors.

Reuters reported a spokesman for the U.S. Defense Department declined  immediate comment on the Der Spiegel report. The French foreign ministry and  Britain’s foreign and defense ministries also would not comment to Reuters.

While Der Spiegel quoted sources discussing training of the rebels in Jordan  over the last three months, WND  was first to report the training as far back as February 2012.

At the time, WND quoted knowledgeable Egyptian and Arab security officials  claimed the U.S., Turkey and Jordan were running a training base for the Syrian  rebels in the Jordanian town of Safawi in the country’s northern desert  region.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/did-hillary-commit-perjury/#obUgA0oCrh4Fbk88.99

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/border-patrol-agents-sequester/2013/03/27/id/496621#ixzz2OoDPrquy
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Reminder: How Mexico Treats "Undesirable" Foreigners

Click if you like this column!

       

                                           

    American politicians in both parties are stampeding all over themselves to pander to Mexico and adopt mass illegal alien amnesty schemes. But while the Mexican government lobbies for more "humane" treatment of illegal border crossers from their country into ours, Mexico remains notoriously restrictionist toward "undesirable" foreigners who break their laws or threaten their security.

 

Despite widely touted immigration "reforms" adopted in 2011, Mexico still puts Mexico first -- as any country that is serious about protecting its sovereignty should and would.

Article 33 of Mexico's constitution establishes the right of the president to detain and deport "any foreigner" and prohibits foreigners from participating "in any way" in the political affairs of the country.

While you read this passage, dwell on the demagogic rhetoric of meddling Mexican consular officials and lobbyists who assail America for its (poorly enforced) detention and deportation policies:

"The President of the Republic shall have the power to expel from national territory any foreigner, according to the law and after a hearing. The law shall establish the administrative procedure for this purpose, as well as the place where the foreigner should be detained and the time for that. Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country."

Article 32 of Mexico's constitution unapologetically bans non-native born residents from holding sensitive jobs and joining the country's military. Preference is given unabashedly to Mexicans over foreigners.

While you read this passage, contemplate the inexorable push by open-borders groups to secure illegal alien "rights" to American jobs, American military assignments, American driver's licenses, discounted U.S. college tuition and Obamacare:

"Only Mexicans by birth can perform all government employments, positions, or commissions in which the status of citizenship is indispensable. During peacetime, foreigners shall neither serve in the Army nor in the police bodies. During peacetime, only Mexicans by birth can serve in the Army, in the Navy or in the Air Force as well can perform any employment or commission within such corporations.

The same condition applies to captains, pilots, skippers, ship engineers, flight engineers and, in general, to every crew member in a ship or an airplane carrying the Mexican flag. In the same way, only Mexicans by birth can be port harbormasters, steersmen and airport superintendents.

Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners, under equal circumstances, for all kind of concessions, employments, positions or commissions of the government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable."

While amnesty advocates and civil liberties zealots in the U.S. decry "police state" tactics against illegal aliens, Mexico fiercely maintains laws against illegal border crossings; "verification visits" to enforce visa conditions; requirements that foreigners produce proof of legal status on demand; and enforcement and cooperation between and among immigration officials and law enforcement authorities at all levels in Mexico. Native-born Mexicans are also empowered to make citizens arrests of illegal aliens and turn them in to authorities.

Mexico's National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest at any time. And for those seeking permanent residency or naturalization, Mexico requires that they must not be economic burdens on society and must have clean criminal histories. Those seeking to obtain Mexican citizenship must show a birth certificate, provide a bank statement proving economic independence, pass an exam and prove they can provide their own health care.

Applicants are assessed based on a point system using factors such as level of education, employment experience, and scientific and technological knowledge. Property acquisition and ownership by foreigners is still severely restricted. Mexican corporations are banned from hiring illegal aliens.

Exit question: If such self-interested "nativism" is right and good for the protection and survival of Mexico, why not for the United States?

America Will Never See Full Employment Under Obama

Read more: http://cowboybyte.com/20328/cbo-america-will-never-see-full-employment-under-obama/#ixzz2OmGnxWv0