truesee's Blog

Man accused of sending 27M spam messages on Facebook

Las Vegas man known as 'Spam King' accused of sending more than 27M spam messages on Facebook

 

SANFORD

FILE - Sanford Wallace, president of Cyber Promotions, poses with his computer and cans of Spam processed meat in Dresher, Pa, in this May 8, 1997 file photo. Wallace, the self-proclaimed "Spam King," pleaded not guilty during an initial court appearance Thursday Aug. 4, 2011 after being indicted July 6 on six counts of electronic mail fraud, three counts of intentional damage to a protected computer and two counts of criminal contempt. The indictment filed in San Jose federal court said Wallace compromised about 500,000 Facebook accounts between November 2008 and March 2009 by sending massive amounts of spam through the company's servers on three separate occasions. (AP Photo/Dan Loh) (DAN LOH, AP / May 8, 1997)

 

LOUISE CHU Associated Press

4:52 a.m. CDT, August 6, 2011

 

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A Las Vegas man accused of sending more than 27 million spam messages to Facebook users faces federal fraud and computer tampering charges that could send him to prison for more than 40 years, according to a grand jury indictment.

Sanford Wallace, the self-proclaimed "Spam King," pleaded not guilty during an initial court appearance Thursday after being indicted July 6 on six counts of electronic mail fraud, three counts of intentional damage to a protected computer and two counts of criminal contempt.

The indictment filed in San Jose federal court said Wallace compromised about 500,000 Facebook accounts between November 2008 and March 2009 by sending massive amounts of spam through the company's servers on three separate occasions.

Wallace would collect Facebook user account information by sending "phishing" messages that tricked users of the social networking site into providing their passwords, the indictment said.

He would then use that information to log into their accounts and post spam messages on their friends' Facebook walls, the indictment said. Those who clicked on the link, thinking it came from their friend, were redirected to websites that paid Wallace for the Internet traffic.

In 2009, Palo Alto-based Facebook sued Wallace under federal anti-spam laws known as CAN-SPAM, prompting a judge to issue a temporary restraining order banning him from using the website. The indictment alleges he violated that order within a month, prompting the criminal contempt charges.

The judge in the lawsuit ultimately issued a default judgment against Wallace for $711 million, one of the largest-ever anti-spam awards, and referred him for possible criminal prosecution.

The indictment came after a two-year investigation of Wallace by the FBI, prosecutors said.

"We will continue to pursue and support both civil and criminal consequences for spammers or others who attempt to harm Facebook or the people who use our service," Chris Sonderby, Facebook's lead security and investigations counsel, said in a statement.

Wallace was released after posting $100,000 bond Thursday, and he's due back in court on Aug. 22.

"Mr. Wallace looks forward to defending himself," his lawyer, K.C. Maxwell, said Friday, declining further comment.

Wallace, 43, earned the monikers "Spam King" and "Spamford" as head of a company named Cyber Promotions that sent as many as 30 million junk e-mails per day in the 1990s.

In May 2008, social networking site MySpace won a $230 million judgment over junk messages sent to its members when a Los Angeles federal judge ruled against Wallace and his partner, Walter Rines, in another case brought under the same anti-spam laws cited in the Facebook lawsuit.

In 2006, Wallace was fined $4 million after the Federal Trade Commission accused him of running an operation that infected computers with software that caused flurries of pop-up ads, known as spyware.

If convicted on all counts in the latest criminal case, Wallace could faces more than 40 years in prison and a $2 million fine.
Entry #5,179

7 Spelling and Grammar Errors that Make You Look Dumb

7 Spelling and Grammar Errors that Make You Look Dumb

Don’t let these easy-to-fix spelling and grammar mistakes make you look unprofessional.

Leslie Ayres
August 5, 2011
 
 

In business, excellence is indeed worth striving for. Make sure all of your communications hold to high standards, because misspellings and bad grammar can hold you back in your career.
 

Many brilliant people have some communication weak spots. Unfortunately, the reality is that written communication is a big part of business, and how you write reflects on you. Poor spelling and grammar can destroy a professional image in an instant.

Even if your job doesn't require much business writing, you'll still have emails to send and notes to write. And if you're looking for a job, your cover letters and resumes will likely mean the difference between getting the interview or not.

Bad grammar and spelling make a bad impression. Don't let yourself lose an opportunity over a simple spelling or grammar mistake.

Here are seven simple grammatical errors that I see consistently in emails, cover letters and resumes.

Tip: Make yourself a little card cheat sheet and keep it in your wallet for easy reference.

You're / Your

The apostrophe means it's a contraction of two words; "you're" is the short version of "you are" (the "a" is dropped), so if your sentence makes sense if you say "you are," then you're good to use you're. "Your" means it belongs to you, it's yours.

  • You're = if you mean "you are" then use the apostrophe
  • Your = belonging to you

 You're going to love your new job!

It's / Its

This one is confusing, because generally, in addition to being used in contractions, an apostrophe indicates ownership, as in "Dad's new car." But, "it's" is actually the short version of "it is" or "it has." "Its" with no apostrophe means belonging to it.

  • It's = it is
  • Its = belonging to it

It's important to remember to bring your telephone and its extra battery.

They're / Their / There

"They're" is a contraction of "they are." "Their" means belonging to them. "There" refers to a place (notice that the word "here" is part of it, which is also a place – so if it says here and there, it's a place). There = a place

  • They're = they are
  • Their = belonging to them

They're going to miss their teachers when they leave there.

Loose / Lose

These spellings really don't make much sense, so you just have to remember them. "Loose" is the opposite of tight, and rhymes with goose. "Lose" is the opposite of win, and rhymes with booze. (To show how unpredictable English is, compare another pair of words, "choose" and "chose," which are spelled the same except the initial sound, but pronounced differently.  No wonder so many people get it wrong!)

  • Loose = it it's not tight, it's loosey goosey
  • Lose= "don't lose the hose for the rose" is a way to remember the same spelling but a different pronunciation

I never thought I could lose so much weight; now my pants are all loose!

Lead / Led

Another common but glaring error. "Lead" means you're doing it in the present, and rhymes with deed. "Led" is the past tense of lead, and rhymes with sled. So you can "lead" your current organization, but you "led" the people in your previous job.

  • Lead = present tense, rhymes with deed
  • Led = past tense, rhymes with sled

My goal is to lead this team to success, just as I led my past teams into winning award after award.

A lot / Alot / Allot

First the bad news: there is no such word as "alot." "A lot" refers to quantity, and "allot" means to distribute or parcel out.

There is a lot of confusion about this one, so I'm going to allot ten minutes to review these rules of grammar.

Between you and I

This one is widely misused, even by TV news anchors who should know better.

In English, we use a different pronoun depending on whether it's the subject or the object of the sentence: I/me, she/her, he/him, they/them. This becomes second nature for us and we rarely make mistake with the glaring excepion of when we have to choose between "you and I" or "you and me."

Grammar Girl does a far better job of explaining this than I, but suffice to say that "between you and I" is never correct, and although it is becoming more common, it's kind of like saying "him did a great job." It is glaringly incorrect.

The easy rule of thumb is to replace the "you and I" or "you and me" with either "we" or "us" and you'll quickly see which form is right. If "us" works, then use "you and me" and if "we" works, then use "you and I."

Between you and me (us), here are the secrets to how you and I (we) can learn to write better.

Master these common errors and you'll remove some of the mistakes and red flags that make you look like you have no idea how to speak.

Entry #5,178

Mother holds 10-year old bully while twin 7-year old daughters get revenge

Mother Accused Of Holding 10-Year-Old Bully While Twin 7-Year-Old Daughters Get Revenge

Madness At Peekskill Youth Center; Father Accused Of Hitting Bully With Chair

August 2, 2011 9:45 PM

Peekskill bullying

Samuel Randolph, left, and Latena Fitzgerald stand accused of helping their twin 7-year-old girls attack a bully. (Photo: CBS 2)

 

PEEKSKILL, N.Y. (CBSNewYork) — Police said it was no way to resolve a conflict.

A youth center worker and his wife, worried about bullying, face charges for helping their daughters fight back, CBS 2’s Tony Aiello reports.

Latena Fitzgerald denied any wrongdoing after a dispute at Peekskill’s Kiley Youth Center, where she took her 7-year-old twins, Aniya and Amiya, to confront a 10-year-old girl over alleged bullying.

“I did not even touch her! Only thing I said to her was to leave my kids alone,” she said.

Police said words got heated and then things turned physical.

“The 10-year-old alleges she was held by the mother of the other girls, and the parents allowed their two daughters to assault her while she was being held,” Peekskill Police Chief Gene Tumolo said.

Cops said Fitzgerald’s husband, Samuel Randolph, threw a chair that hit the 10-year-old in the back.

Randolph works at the youth center. The director said it was appropriate for cops to file charges.

“Any time children are involved with safety you have to protect them,” Jasper Cain said.

“It just sends such a terrible message when kids see parents behaving in this way,” Chief Tumolo added.

LINK TO VIDEO:

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/category/video-on-demand-news/?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=6112711

Fitzgerald said she and Randolph have talked repeatedly to the alleged bully and her mom, and thought it was time for their kids to fight back.

“He told Aniya to hit the girl back and that would be the end of it and for her to leave her alone. The little girl got out the chair and slapped my daughter, right in front of us. That’s what caused the big outbreak,” Fitzgerald said.

Everyone involved lives in the same public housing complex. Fitzgerald said to help defuse tensions she has sent her daughters to live with family in Connecticut.

The couple was hit with endangerment charges and a restraining order to keep away from the 10-year-old.

The accused couple is now waiting to find out if Randolph will lose his job at the youth center.

Entry #5,177

Man tries to rob 7-Eleven Store with tree branch

Police: Tree Branch-Wielding Man Robbed 7-Eleven Store In Central Islip

August 5, 2011 2:55 PM

 

(credit: Handout/Suffolk County PD)

(credit: Handout/Suffolk County PD)

 

CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. (CBSNewYork) – It may not have been a weapon of choice but rather one of convenience.

Suffolk County police say a Ronkonkoma man was arrested after trying to rob a 7-Eleven store in Central Islip Thursday night using a large tree branch.

Michael Zimmerman, 31, is accused of walking into the store around 11:30 p.m. and demanding money from the clerk.

After being denied, police said Zimmerman struck the clerk several times with the branch.

Police said Zimmerman took off on his motorcycle which was parked in the lot after the clerk fought him off but didn’t get very far.

An off-duty Nassau County police officer blocked the motorcycle after he saw Zimmerman being chased by the clerk and a small group of customers

The officer held Zimmerman until Suffolk County police arrived.

Zimmerman has been charged with robbery in the first degree.

Entry #5,176

College student calls in bomb threat so she could study for test

PSC Student Arrested In False Bomb Threat

More arrests and additional charges are expected in the investigation.

By ELVIA MALAGON
THE LEDGER

Published: Thursday, August 4, 2011 at 11:41 p.m.

Last Modified: Thursday, August 4, 2011 at 11:41 p.m.

LAKELAND | A Polk State College student has been arrested after telling deputies she took part in making a false bomb threat in July so she could study for a test.

Facts

 

"It's a top priority because bomb threats to college campuses will not be tolerated."

Grady Judd
Polk County Sheriff

Alexxis C. Anthony, 19, from Lakeland, told deputies she and a friend, Theron K. Brown Jr., were involved in a July 28 bomb threat to the college because she wanted her class to be canceled, according to an arrest affidavit filed by a Polk County sheriff's detective.

Anthony, a student at the Lakeland campus, told deputies she was pressured to keep her grades up because of a ­college scholarship.

The Lakeland campus was evacuated and closed July 28 until law enforcement confirmed that there were no explosive devices.

It was one of three bomb threats made to Polk State in July. The first two threats resulted in the evacuations of four Polk State campuses.

So far, Anthony is the only person charged in connection with a bomb threat. She was arrested Tuesday afternoon.

But sheriff's officials said Thursday they expect more arrests will be made and additional charges filed as the investigation proceeds.

The arrest affidavit said the two other threats — on July 6 and July 20 — were made from the same cell phone.

The July 28 bomb threat was made to the Winter Haven campus, the report said. The caller told the school the bomb would go off at the Lakeland campus at 9:15 a.m. That day, the college was announcing its new branding and mascot.

Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said Thursday night that Winter Haven police received cell phone records and were able to trace bomb threats to the college July 6 and July 20.

The agencies used the records of cell phone calls to find Judeane Curry, a student at the Lakeland campus. She is identified in the affidavit as Brown's girlfriend.

Curry initially denied knowing anything about the threats. Later, she told sheriff's detectives that Brown had called her on the morning of July 28 and told her that he wanted to make a bomb threat to get her and Anthony out of school, according to the affidavit.

Curry told detectives she dismissed the comment, but later heard over a school intercom that the campus was being evacuated.

The bomb threat on the morning of July 6 caused the college to shut down its Lakeland, Winter Haven, Lake Wales and Lakeland Airside Center locations until 1 p.m.

The bomb threat July 20 also caused the four locations to close.

Officials at Polk State estimated in July that the first two threats cost the college more than $130,000. The cost was attributed to the college having to cancel classes.

Judd said Winter Haven police and the Sheriff's Office will continue to investigate the bomb threats.

"It's a top priority because bomb threats to college campuses will not be tolerated," Judd said.

"Everyone involved can expect to be arrested."

Anthony faces a charge of falsely reporting a bomb threat. Her bail is set at $15,750.

 

LINK TO PHOTO: 

http://www.theledger.com/article/20110804/NEWS/110809721

Entry #5,172

Police puzzled by $100k stuffed in Channel Nine toilet bin

Police puzzled by $100k stuffed in Channel Nine toilet bin

 

Jessica Craven, Colin Vickery

Herald Sun

August 05, 2011 12:00AM

Nine News toilet cash dump footage

A screen grab shows the dramatised footage of the toilet cash dump incident shown on Nine News. Source: Supplied

UPDATE 12.15pm: CHANNEL 9 News has been forced to admit that it faked footage of a man dumping $100,000 in a toilet cubicle.

Last night’s edition of Nine News reported that cash totalling $100,000 had been found stuffed in a toilet bin.

Nine’s story showed what appeared to be security photos of the man entering the disabled toilet at Docklands and dumping his money stash.

However, Nine has now confessed that it dramatised the footage, although a spokesman insisted today that there was no intention to pretend the footage was real.

“We categorically refute the assertion that Channel Nine attempted to fake footage," he said.

"There was never any intention to deceive or mislead our viewers. This was nothing more than a production oversight. The word “reconstruction” should have been displayed.”

Nine reporter Brendan Roberts says the images used in the story were a "re-creation" of events.

“There is no camera footage actually in the toilet itself,” Roberts told 3AW this morning.

“The person who was responsible was probably a lot thinner and of a different ethnicity (to the images used on Nine News).”

The man spent five hours stuffing $100,000 into a bin in a disabled toilet in a bizarre incident which has left police puzzled.

Cleaners discovered the cash in $100 notes stuffed in the bin on Wednesday night.

He walked from the building five hours later.

Police have appealed for the mystery man to come forward.

Detective Sgt Mark McCrann told Channel Nine the incident was ''quite unusual''.

''There's only one person that can tell us why that cash was left in the toilets,'' he said yesterday.

''We'd certainly want him to come forward and we're certainly interested in having a chat with him.''

The money is likely to be declared the proceeds of crime and will be seized by the state of Victoria.

Entry #5,169

Teacher suspended for bullying, harrassing and calling students names

Kettering teacher suspended for allegedly calling students names

Fairmont faculty member accused of unprofessional conduct.

 

Jill Kelley

Staff Writer

Updated 2:48 PM Wednesday, August 3, 2011

 

KETTERING — The Kettering school board on Tuesday night approved the suspension of Fairmont High School English teacher Michael Togliatti without pay, pending the termination of his contract.

Togliatti, a 10-year veteran of the school with no prior disciplinary record, is accused of engaging in unprofessional and disrespectful conduct toward students.

Principal Dan VonHandorf said an investigation began when a student in the spring complained to the staff about comments Togliatti made.

“Then the student said we (also) should talk to other students,” said VonHandorf. He said that after talking with several students, he felt the claims had been substantiated.

Togliatti was escorted from the school April 18 and has not been allowed back on school grounds.

A letter sent to Togliatti on July 8 from Jim Justice, Kettering City Schools’ director of human resource services, contained specific examples of the some of the comments the district reportedly received from students.

“You demeaned and embarrassed certain students,” Justice wrote, by allegedly calling them “idiots,” “airheads,” and “freaking morons;” telling students to “shut up” and “repeatedly” using profanity directed at students.

“You told a student that nothing smart could ever come out of her mouth, and that nobody likes her anyway,” the letter stated. “You had a picture of the superintendent next to your desk, and periodically ridiculed him to your students.”

The claims were disputed by students who supported Togliatti in letters and school protests. More than a dozen spoke at Tuesday’s board meeting. They characterized him as “respectful and caring,” “a real educator who teaches us about world issues,” and one who motivated them to excel.

Jim Williams, a former teacher and guidance counselor at Fairmont, said he visited Togliatti’s class often. “The idea that he would do something that would cause him to be terminated is impossible.”

Williams also noted that “it was no secret that there was some personality conflict between Mr. Togliatti and some administrators,” but he asked that personalities be taken out of the board’s decision-making.

John Doll, Togliatti’s attorney, said there are definitely two sides to this story.

He said the next step is to appeal the board’s decision and conduct a hearing with an objective third party.

“We believe these allegations based on their investigation will not be substantiated at the hearing,” he said.

A hearing has not been set to determine the status of Togliatti’s contract.

VonHandorf said he is “absolutely” saddened by the potential loss of Togliatti, but he does believe he overstepped with students.

Justice agreed.

“Given the information that was presented to us, we are doing what we believe is necessary to protect and preserve our students’ right to be educated in a safe environment,” he said.

 

LINK TO VIDEO AND FOLLOW-UP:

 

http://www.whiotv.com/news/28747230/detail.html

Entry #5,168

Thief returns stolen items to victim and leaves a long apology letter

Theft suspect returns stolen items to victim

Cara Hogan

The Eagle Tribune

Thu Aug 04, 2011, 01:24 AM EDT

PLAISTOW — Police are calling him the "remorseful robber."

A man returned $90 and a GPS to the 61-year-old woman he robbed a few weeks earlier, stopping at her home and leaving a long letter of apology.

"She said he knocked on her door around 8 p.m. (on July 26)," Deputy police Chief Kathleen Jones said. "When she opened the door, he said he was sorry, put the stuff down and ran away. He knew where she lived from the items he stole from the wallet."

The suspect stole the woman's purse from a shopping cart at the Plaistow Market Basket on July 18. He grabbed her wallet and GPS, leaving the purse behind in the supermarket aisle. The wallet was later found by the Tewksbury post office and returned to the victim.

The victim of the crime, while happy to have her belongings returned, is still afraid, Jones said.

"Having him show up at her door, even though he was trying to do a decent thing, was a little unnerving," she said. "He had committed a crime against her."

And Jones said though the police are calling the suspect remorseful, she isn't convinced.

"It was either nice, or he knows he's been in the paper and is trying to head off the inevitable," she said.

Jones said the man will still be charged with theft by unauthorized taking despite returning what he had stolen. So far, there are no suspects in the case.

"We have a few tips, but nothing concrete yet," Jones said. "I have no doubt they'll be able to make an arrest in this case."

The suspect also was spotted in a neighboring town by an off-duty police officer and pursued. He got away, but police were able to get a better description of him.

He is a white male with fair skin, blue eyes, 5 feet 10 inches tall, heavy set, in his late 20s to mid-30s.

He has short light brown hair and a brown close-cropped beard and mustache. He wears branded baseball caps, like Nike and Patriots, dark-colored T-shirts, and Converse high-top gray sneakers or sandals. He drives a newer red car, similar to a station wagon.

 

Police are looking for this man who recently returned items to his victim.

16501793ET.jpg

Entry #5,167

Kidnappers Introduce Victim's Girlfriend To Wife

Kidnappers Introduce Victim's Girlfriend To Wife

Spree Spanned From Hialeah To Miami

POSTED: Wednesday, August 3, 2011
UPDATED: 5:58 pm EDT August 3, 2011

Local 10.com 

EmailTwitter
Facebook
Google Buzz
Digg
Reddit
Delicious
MIAMI -- Police are investigating a bizarre robbery and kidnapping that happened in Miami-Dade County on Tuesday night.
 
Police said it all started just after 11 p.m., when four men in ski masks ambushed a couple sitting in a pickup truck at 95 E. 43rd St. in Hialeah.

The robbers forced the man into a waiting vehicle, and two of the robbers got into the pickup truck with the woman, Miami police said. The masked men used flex cuffs to bind the man's and the woman's wrists and drove them to the man's house on Northwest 14th Street in Miami, according to investigators.

When they arrived at the house, police said they found the man's wife, his mother and two children in the home.

Police said the robbers tied up the whole family, beat up the man, roughed up his wife and then took jewelry and money from the home. The men took off with thousands of dollars in cash and jewelry, Miami police said.

Before leaving, the robbers brought the man's girlfriend into the home and introduced her to his wife, according to investigators. The robbers then left them all together in the house and took off.

Miami police said the robbers were in their mid-20s to early 30s. Police have recovered the victim's vehicle.

Entry #5,166

Newt Gingrich: Why is he running for the GOP presidential nomination?

Observations and provocations
from The Times' Opinion staff

 

Newt Gingrich: Why is he running for the GOP presidential nomination?

August 3, 2011 |  4:00 pm
 
Newt Gingrich

Is Newt Gingrich’s presidential campaign just a way for him to pass the time? That’s the take of Dante Scala, a political science professor at the University of New Hampshire. "He's on a lark," Scala is quoted as saying in a Wednesday story by Seema Mehta.  "It just seems to be a hobby more than a campaign at this point."

While other GOP candidates, including Michele Bachmann and Mitt Romney, have hit the campaign trail hard in Iowa, the former House speaker has gone the low-key route. Mehta writes:

Even the visit to Decorah, in the northeastern corner of the state close to the Minnesota border, was prompted by Callista Gingrich's plans to attend a reunion at her alma mater there, Luther College. While Newt greeted diners at a pancake breakfast at the town's brick firehouse, Callista rehearsed with fellow band alumni.

The motivation behind the Deborah stop recalls a June op-ed by the New York Times’ Maureen Dowd, which paints a picture of Gingrich as man undone by the women in his life.

This supposed leader of men is easily led, from his budget tango with the more astute Bill Clinton to his relationships with women.

The son of a teenage single mother who was passed off as his sister, Gingrich has always been guided by women. His first wife, Jackie, was his former high school geometry teacher. The family-values pol cheated on her and left her when she was fighting uterine cancer.

He then married his mistress, Marianne, and worked on books and politics with her until he cheated on her and left her when she was fighting multiple sclerosis. He then married his mistress, Callista, and now he produces agitprop with her.

His favorite phrase is “Callista and I,” his Web site is all about “Newt & Callista,” and he has happily spent a fortune adorning his adored one.

Funnily enough, none of his sexual transgressions — even when he was pushing Clinton’s impeachment while he himself was cheating with Callista, then a 20-something aide on the House Agriculture Committee — landed him in as much political trouble as being loyal to his wife.

He thought his devotion to Callista would bring him political redemption. Instead, it has brought him political reduction. His campaign now boils down to the two of them.

But why bother campaigning as a hobby when, as Dowd also pointed out in her column, Callista would be just as happy on an island in Greece? When columnist Doyle McManus weighed in on Gingrich in May, he wrote:

[Gingrich] believes in his ideas. He has a healthy ego -- perhaps an over-healthy one. And he may hear his biological clock ticking. Gingrich will be 68 in June; this may be his last chance to run for president.

He wouldn't be the first politician to reach a certain age and run for president whether his prospects look good or not. These candidates may not expect to win, but they'd hate to end their careers without having tried.

There's another possibility too. McManus again:

The role that suits him is that of intellectual provocateur and polemicist; Gingrich has always loved big ideas, and even now says he would rather talk about brain science than what he calls "the mundane details" of electoral politics. […] He calls himself "the candidate of ideas," and told a reporter in Iowa that his presidential effort was "something that happens once or twice in a century."

One could interpret Gingrich's campaign as a PR stunt to boost his profile, which could later lead to big-money book deals. It would be a win-win, if you think about it. He could get paid to express himself and Callista could continue to enjoy her bling.

Entry #5,165