- lottoburg's Blog has 4 entries (0 private) and has been viewed 10,763 times.
- Lottery Post members have made 3 comments in lottoburg's Blog.
- lottoburg is a Standard member
November 20, 2014, 12:19 amTwo convictive examples for A+
There are two convictive examples here in fact.
Mr Tex Amos is the best member in Gail Howard Group of Facebook!
Not only he's learning and using LMG and A+/Gold faithfully and tirelessly but also has created many smart strategies for using A+ more than 20 years.
But Mr Tex Amos has not yet gotten a Jackpot in any lotto games until now. (more than 20 years!) Why?
Is he not hard enough? No, absolutely! Is he not smart enough?? No, absolutely!! Is he bad luck??? No, absolutely!!!
Obviously, there is one answer only here: A+/Gold is not working!
The second example just is me. I'm a serious lotto player too. And I have ordered, learned and used LMG and A+ since 2000.
From 2000 to today, I have learned LMG & A+/Gold carefully more than 10 times! I have searched and learned the Strategies about using LMG & A+/Gold carefully from Lottery Post, Facebook, Smart Luck, and others. I have used and broken 5 printers and 3 computers for it!
In more than ten years, my Worksheets and Notebooks that are used to analyzing A+ can be together heaped in half a person high!
But Not only I have not yet gotten a Jackpot in any lotto games but also I can not get a real profit by using A+/Gold until now!!!
Please remember: Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. And the attitude of seeking the truth from the facts is the best support and help to A+/Gold!!!
I do suggest Gail Howard and Joe can improve their Programmer Team asap and make a real and effectual Update for A+/Gold instead of bragging and cheating to customers
October 29, 2014, 1:40 pmReconsider the Lottery Master Guide (LMG) and A + / Gold Program
Reconsider the Lottery Master Guide (LMG) and A + / Gold Program
LMG is a good book! It summarized and analyzed the Lotto Games from the causes and characteristics to their statistical laws systematically and seriously.
LMG is practical and easy to understand. Also, its maneuverability is very strong! The book has became the Lotto Bible by numerous players in the world although its content has not yet been changed or revised substantially since 1984.
In fact, LMG is still the best Lotto book in the current market, and no any Lotto books can go beyond it so far!
Unfortunately, the A + / Gold Program does not really reflect the true meaning of LMG! In other wards, A + / Gold just is the simple and mechanical repetition of the LMG only , as well as the most Lotto Programs in the market, A+/Gold just is the carding and listing of Statistical Data for lotto games and it doesn't have the prediction function to any lotto games in fact!!!
And the use of computer technology mainly in A+ is still DOS which used in 20 years ago. There is no use of contemporary computer science such as AS Artificial Intelligence, Optimization Modeling of Feedback Tracking and Fuzzy Recognition, Real-Time... etc. In fact, the current A+/Gold not only cannot help users to accurately predict the winning ?#s? but also it brings the great pressure, time consuming and financial lost to the all users.
Please remember, it's a computer and Internet age!
The all walks of life have had the great progress by using the current advantage technology of computer and Internet. There is a good example like Weather Forecast. We have to admit that today's accuracy of the weather forecast is much better than before. It depends on the progress of contemporary computer science (including the Artificial Intelligence and the Remote Sensing Technology) completely.
So I don't understand why the A+/Gold has still kept the old Algorithm in its program more than 30 years. Why???
As a customer, I do hope the A+/Gold can help us to win constantly (not each draw) and economically (get a real profit). I think the request to A+ is reasonable and basic.
Finally, I do suggest Gail Howard and Joe can improve their Programmer Team asap and make a real and effectual Update for A+/Gold.
May 26, 2012, 12:27 pmMy opinion about Lotto game
1)I think lotto #s can be predicted. Indeed lotto is a random and chance game but it's a real
science too in the view of mathematics. The reason that we have not yet found a good software is we
have not yet had the enough ability to design it, otherwise, the people who possess such software do
not want to share it. There is a good example like Weather Forecast. We have to admit that today's
accuracy of the weather forecast is much better than before. It depends on the progress of
contemporary computer science (including the Artificial Intelligence and the Remote Sensing
2) Saying lotto #s can be predicted means that:
a. The lotto's ODDS can be reduced down by our tools which include the paper & pen, Excel,
software such C++, Java, ...etc, and even someone's Mystical methods....
The tool is better the odd is lower.
b. The meaning of PREDICTION is that we can win constantly (not each time!) and economically
(get a real profit !) by using a system which is really working for lotto. Saying win means various
prizes from the lowest to a JP.
3) A good lotto software should furthest follow the statistical law of random and chance in
lotto games and furthest replace the functions of human brain including Statistical
Calculation, the Forecast Analysis (similar to Artificial Intelligence), Optimized Feedback, and
Some software have Statistical Calculation only but can not make a good Forecast Analysis like GH's
Advantage Plus. Some software have so many Filters in which they include too many uncertainties to
select like Expert Lotto. As Stan (the owner of Expert Lotto ) said: The mistakes don't come from my
system but you can not select the Filters or the Settings correctly when the members're complaining
with. What a real good excuse is !!!
In fact, No any members including Stan himself can get any bigger win by using the Expert Lotto since
it was born.
Last Edited: May 26, 2012, 9:36 pm
August 21, 2011, 11:28 pmIs this your Forum about LSA ?
Is this your Forum about LSA? In other words, why not take a Forum in your Website of LSA instead of in LP?