Time for the oxymoron and is complimentary of the Rush himself. Remember how Rush and the Reluncticans were hell bent on Obama being lawless, missing in action on key incidents, not going through congress, and using Executive Action? Well, it turns out that this is what leaders do, according to him in this excerpt from today's transcript. Seems it was okay for Bush to do all these things which characterized him as the ultimate leader, right? But, it makes Obama the Tyranny Leader...the Destroyer of America and an Outlaw...above the law. Have a looksie:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/11/03/obama_calls_gop_chicken_on_debates

Back Home Button The Rush Limbaugh Show
Excellence in Broadcasting
HOME
AUDIO/VIDEO
PODCASTS
ARCHIVES
STACK
EMAIL
STATIONS
STORE
LIMBAUGH LETTER
PARODIES
PHOTOS
CONTACT
EIB WEB PAGE DISGRONIFIER

Search Button
E-mail Article ButtonHelp Button
Home     > Archives (Nov 3, 2015)     > Obama Calls GOP Chicken on Debates
Obama Calls GOP Chicken on Debates
November 03, 2015
Listen to it Button
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Back to something I predicted. This is after the CNBC debate. I want you to go back, listen to what I said the day after the debate.

RUSH ARCHIVE: I think there's this built-in fear of going against the media because the criticism is, "You mean you can't handle questions from the media and you want to be president of the United States? Come on, you can't be serious. You need to toughen up." And that's the wrong way to look at this, because we're not dealing with tough questions here. We're not dealing with challenging questions here. We're dealing with assassins. We're dealing with character assassins. We're dealing with career assassins. That's who the media is today.

RUSH: And right on schedule, last night the Republicans' greatest fears were realized, and it comes from the mouth, the oral cavity of none other than Barack Hussein O at a Democrat National Committee fundraiser in New York City.

OBAMA: Have you noticed that every one of these candidates say: "Obama's weak, Putin's kicking sand in his face. When I talk to Putin, he's gonna straighten out. Just looking at him I'm gonna -- he's gonna be --" and then it turns out they can't handle a bunch of CNBC moderators at a debate. (cheers and applause) I mean, let me tell you, if you can't handle -- if you can't handle those guys, you know, then I don't think the Chinese and the Russians are gonna be too worried about you.

RUSH: Exactly. This is what they're afraid of, and this is why they don't attack the media because they think Obama and other Democrats are gonna make fun of them, and they're not gonna have any retort for it. But we're not dealing with tough questions, as I said. These were assassins that were asking questions. There was an attempt here to destroy. There wasn't any attempt to ask tough questions. There weren't any challenging questions. These were assassination type, career ending type questions.

The mission was obvious here. It was to take these guys out, take out as many of these Republicans out as you can, particularly the front-runners. But the Republicans did not cave to them. What's everybody missing about this? The Republicans destroyed those moderators. They didn't walk away whimpering in fear. Led by Ted Cruz, they put those people in their place. Republicans rolled over those moderators. They didn't whimper and cry and put their tail between their legs and leave the stage and then go out there and start complaining about this.

They devastated, they destroyed those CNBC moderators. How is what happened in that debate weak? How is taking control of fixed debates weak? How is finally getting some gonads and saying, "You know what? We are not going to willingly put ourselves in the crosshairs of assassins that are disguised as journalists who are nothing more than Democrat Party hacks" weak? Can I remind you of all the Democrat debates that have been on Fox News? Yeah, right. I didn't think you could remember any because there haven't been any.

The Democrats are scared to death to go on Fox News. The Democrats wouldn't get anywhere near it. And, in fact, Reuters story, flashback, March 9, 2007: "Nevada Democratic Party officials said on Friday they were canceling a presidential debate co-sponsored by Fox News, following a joke chairman Roger Ailes made about Democratic candidate Barack Obama. In a letter sent to Fox, Nevada State Democratic Party Chairman Tom Collins and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Ailes 'went too far' with comments made the night before."

So were there any comments back in 2000 that Obama was too chicken-excrement to deal with Fox News 'cause Ailes had told a joke about him? This is the guy who does cave to Putin. This is the guy who does cave to Bashar Assad. This is the guy who stands up to only one person out there, and that's Benjamin Netanyahu. And even that's not really standing up. That's just disrespect from distance. But this guy caves to everybody that's out there.

This is a guy who thinks the Republican Party is his number one enemy, and so he dispatches his minions at the IRS and the EPA and the State Department and the Department of Justice to go out and destroy his Republican enemies because he doesn't even want any opposition. "The letter makes no reference..." This is a letter that the Nevada state Democrat Party sent to Fox. "The letter makes no reference to a crusade by the liberal activist group MoveOn.org to boycott Fox, which it calls a 'right-wing mouthpiece.'"

Remember, this is 2007, so it's eight years ago now.

"Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards dropped out of the debate on Thursday, citing in part Fox's participation. ... Fox News Vice President David Rhodes responded with a written statement criticizing the Democrats for caving in to MoveOn.org," which is exactly what the Democrats do. They cave to their rabid, left-wing, insane, lunatic asylum base supporters. But we didn't get a bunch of whining after that debate or during that debate. We got a bunch of people standing up to something they should have stood up to long ago.

They literally destroyed Harwood and they destroyed Quintanilla and they destroyed Becky Quick. And it was informative, and it was illustrative and it was educational. But more than that, it was way overdue. But, see, despite what you saw, despite what I saw -- which I just accurately described -- everybody's making hay now out of this Obama comment that the Republicans are a bunch of chickens. "Yeah, talking tough about standing up to Putin, but they can't even stand up to CNBC!"

Stand up to them is exactly what happened. The Republicans on that stage stood up and refused to roll over, refused to play the game, refused to be assassinated by those Democrat hit squad members disguised as journalists on CNBC. And of course, not to mention the fact that I predicted and called it. Just further evidence that if you listen regularly to this program, you'll be on the cutting edge. Now, as it relates to debates, that's another story out there.

In addition to polling data and sex drive being killed by global warming and air-conditioning being the aphrodisiac (except the EPA is gonna destroy air-conditioning because it's destroying the planet), and you can be killed by two Diet Cokes a day, the Republicans are revolting against an establishment Republican lawyer named Ben Ginsberg who is trying to take over the debate format process. The RNC had control of the debates. Candidates want to control the future debates themselves. Ben Ginsberg is a...

He goes way back.

Super bad mis-post...a major fail. Wish I could fix it, folks. Da**it!!!

Great post Lucky Loser.
Rush has the Democrats figured out.