The entire incident just begs the question! I mean, this guy was armed, shooting, and killed three people while wounding many. Yet, they felt compelled to 'talk it over' with him. (Chin on the ground). They gave HIM a chance but, they'll drop darn near every black person that's unarmed, or, has a knife like a silhouette at a shooting range. Time for more Critical Thinking:

Remember how it was said that Benghazi had something to do with a 'video?' Whether you'really with it or nor, it's very ironic that this terrorist cited 'no more baby PARTS' in his plight for self-justice. He was impacted by that false video which all the Republicans jumped on board with and promoted. So, who should be held accountable for this?

Before the whole baby parts implication, there was no baby parts issue. Furthermore, NONE of the Republican candidates who promoted that term are now talking about the issue while NEITHER USING THE TERM BABY PARTS LIKE THE TERRORIST DID. How about that...they now don't want to be associated with the very issue that killed three people. Oh, but they're PRO LIFE. Ted Cruz and Carly Fiorina, mainly, have it coming.