Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 3:42 am
You last visited January 20, 2017, 2:54 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Pope and Kissinger Warn the World

Published:

Last Edited: September 20, 2006, 1:24 pm

A clash of old against new, the old accustomed to ruling in darkness because it's been able to do so for 1500 years or more. 

However, considering the amount of spiritual light or enlightenment that has poured onto the planet since the Harmonic Convergence in 1987, no wonder dark elements are fighting for their very lives.  It's evident even here in the US. 

They'll lose, light always prevails over darkness especially now that the balance is changed. 


 

"The Pope and Kissinger Warn the World


September 20, 2006
By Tony Blankley
Washington Times

There is an historically fairly predictable pattern to the unfolding strategies and views of great wars. They often start with a morally ambiguous view of the enemy, a more limited conception of the war's magnitude and a restrained application of violent tactics.

Eventually, moral clarity is obtained, war objectives expand - often to grandiosity, and tactics become ferocious. For example at the start of our Civil War in 1861 at the Battle of First Manassas, spectators came out by carriage with picnic lunches to observe the event. By 1865, Gen. Sherman executed a campaign of civilian terror and material obliteration in his march to the sea. Likewise, the war started with the purpose of saving the union, but morally expanded to end slavery - north and south.

World War II started out in Europe first with the phony war and mutual thoughts of a negotiated peace, then with careful bombing (Hitler initially ordered that London not be bombed) and ended with the firebombing of Dresden and Tokyo and the atomic obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Even during his war on the Jews, as late as 1940, Hitler was thinking of deporting German Jews to Madagascar, and ended in rounding up Jews throughout Europe and perpetrating genocide in industrially designed death camps (although some historians believe the Madagascar plan may always have been a subterfuge for the Final Solution.)

Today, the West's struggle to resist radical Islamic aggression (both cultural and terroristic) is still in that early phase of moral confusion and limited tactics. Thus we continue to debate the ethical merits of minor intrusions into American civil liberties (such as NSA surveillance of some phone calls from foreign suspects), and even serious and patriotic men such as Sen. John McCain and Gen. Colin Powell challenge the need to permit psychologically rough - but nonviolent - interrogation of captured terrorists.

But there are some signs that the early stage of moral confusion is beginning to give way to greater clarity. Last week, two towering intellects - Pope Benedict XVI and Henry Kissinger - began to offer clarity. On Tuesday the pope gave his now famous, but still misunderstood, lecture at the University of Regensburg, and on WednesdayMr. Kissinger published in The Washington Post a half page seminal article on the risk of civilizational war.

Any fair and careful reading of the pope's lecture must conclude that it was not an inadvertent insult to Islam. Rather it was a firm assertion that the Judeo-Christian God acts in accordance with reason (In the beginning was the logos - word and reason.), and thus Christians and Jews can undertake a rational debate about the morality of violence. He quotes, now famously, Emperor Manuel II's assertion in 1391 that Islam spreads its faith through violence - which, he says, is unreasonable and incompatible with the nature of God. He then cites an 11th-century Arab Muslim theologian, Ibn Hazn, who argued that Allah is transcendent of reason.

After criticizing secular Christians for not giving reason its proper place in understanding faith and God, he concludes his lecture by again quoting the Byzantine Emperor Manuel II on his same criticism of Islam. Then the pope finishes his lecture with the following words: "It is to this great logos, to this breadth of reason, that we invite our partners in the dialogue of cultures. To rediscover it constantly is the great task of the university."

In other words, he is inviting Islam to explain whether its God is like ours - inherently understandable by reason (and thus, is their God opposed to violence, as ours is?)

He was also, I strongly suspect, speaking to his own flock, both to return to proper Christianity and to consider the nature of Islam. And, I suspect, the pope did not inadvertently quote the now inflammatory passage. If he had not included that quote, the world would not now be debating his lecture. While the pope surely did not want to see violence, he just as surely wanted to engage the world in this vital search for clarity.

While not the pope, Mr. Kissinger is the world's premier practitioner and scholar of real politic. So, it is consequential that in his article last week he warned the world that "we are witnessing a carefully conceived assault, not isolated terrorist attacks, on the international system of respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. The creation of organizations such as Hezbollah and al-Qaeda symbolizes the fact that transnational loyalties are replacing national ones. The driving force behind this challenge is the jihadist conviction that it is the existing order that is illegitimate."

He went on to warn that "The debate sparked by the Iraq war over American rashness vs. European escapism is dwarfed by what the world now faces...the common danger of a wider war merging into a war of civilizations against the backdrop of a nuclear-armed Middle East...We now know that we face the imperative of building a new world order or potential global catastrophe."

These are shocking words coming from the verbally impeccably careful diplomatist.

So, within 24 hours the pope raises the question whether Islam is inherently violent and unreasonable, while Henry Kissinger warns of a possibly emerging nuclear clash of civilizations.

Moral clarity, anyone?

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060919-091310-2934r.htm
http://www.stevequayle.com/News.alert/06_Global/060920.Pope.Kissinger.html?id=16966

Entry #577

Comments

1.
konaneComment by konane - September 20, 2006, 3:44 pm
Now that Islamafascists are calling for assassination of the Pope for inviting religious dialogue, we're getting down to the real reason for their temper tantrums. There can be only one religion, theirs, period.

Viewing Islamafascists as adult size two year olds in the throes of a hissiefit wearing a bomb-vest with one finger on the nuke button, the other on an AK-47 trigger .... just about sums up their ability to make rational civilized decisions.

From Powerlineblog.com, and I couldn't agree more ......      "There is a horrifically evil force in the world today,

and that force is the movement that seeks to spread Islam by the sword. Pope Benedict XVI is the spiritual and moral leader of a great religion the members of which that movement would either forcibly convert or murder. Recently, he called out that evil, related it to what plainly is its origin, and declared it "incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul." ................

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015320.php
2.
Comment by shalini - September 20, 2006, 11:54 pm
very well summed up konane!
3.
konaneComment by konane - September 21, 2006, 9:33 am
Thanks, Shalini! People don't seem to understand that evil is born from human beings intentionally drawing dark energy or dark light which for a better way to describe it is like antimatter which is bad energy in everything around it because it can't create light energy to sustain itself. It is parasitic in nature and takes light from its host and other people to sustain itself through generating fear and other upsetting emotions.

I've read and do find it credible that the greatest evil on earth comes not from somewhere else but does in fact come from the mind of a person or group which intentionally chooses to use dark energy. Have also read this is part of our test on earth since we have both light and dark present to create.

Sages knew it and have tried to explain it through time but now the entire world is getting to see first hand and realize it for what it is ..... everything diametrically opposite of what we normal people have been taught is good and beneficial to have around us.

In the case of extremism dark energy is fed and personified, cloaked as good and the masses are fed the message. We saw Hitler use it, now we see his descendants doing the same proclaiming ethnic cleansing for the entire planet. It's not just a Middle East issue anymore and hasn't been since at least 1994 or earlier when they found they could draw blood with impunity.

We're seeing it exacerbated now for two reasons the first being that they weren't stopped when there was a window to do it and were able to organize better. Second is that the spiritual light which began in 1987 has increased to date and amplified everything bringing things previously hidden to the surface for everyone to examine.

So now it's time for the world to decide if it's going to continue being bullied by savages or put a stop to it once and for all. I believe that Pres. Bush made his decision on 9-11-01, and knowing what I know stand behind him 100%.
4.
konaneComment by konane - September 21, 2006, 9:45 am
REPOST OF MY LAST ENTRY.

Copied and pasted the wrong work sheet which doesn't clearly define what I was trying to say. Sheesh if I could only be a writer!!.....


Thanks, Shalini! People don't seem to understand that evil is born from human beings intentionally drawing dark energy or dark light which for a better way to describe it is like antimatter which is bad energy in everything around it because it can't create light energy to sustain itself. It is parasitic in nature and takes light from its host and other people to sustain itself through generating fear and other upsetting emotions.

I've read and do find it credible that the greatest evil on earth comes not from somewhere else but does in fact come from the mind of a person or group which intentionally chooses to use dark energy. Have also read this is part of our test on earth since we have both light and dark present to create.

Sages knew it and have tried to explain it through time but now the entire world is getting to see first hand and realize it for what it is ..... everything diametrically opposite of what we normal people have been taught is good and beneficial to have around us.

In the case of extremism dark energy is fed and personified, cloaked as good and the masses are fed the message. We saw Hitler use it, now we see his descendants doing the same proclaiming ethnic cleansing for the entire planet. It's not just a Middle East issue anymore and hasn't been since at least 1994 or earlier when they found they could draw blood with impunity.

We're seeing it exacerbated now for two reasons the first being that they weren't stopped when there was a window to do it and were able to organize better. Second is that the spiritual light which began in 1987 has increased to date and amplified everything bringing things previously hidden to the surface for everyone to examine.

So now it's time for the world to decide if it's going to continue being bullied by savages or put a stop to it once and for all. I believe that Pres. Bush made his decision on 9-11-01, and knowing what I know stand behind him 100%.     

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.