From the article:

-Paul Ryan insists that a ban on Muslim migration would be wrong because, “Muslims are our partners.” That would come as news to all the Americans killed at home and abroad by “our partners” from Saudi Arabia to Muslim refugees and terrorists operating in the United States. And yet even after the latest Muslim terrorist attack in Orlando, Paul Ryan shows no sign of being willing to reconsider his position.-

The author is following the same 'willingly blind narrative' instead of calling a duck a d@mned duck! It seems that if Muslims from abroad or homegrown kill Americans, then that's just the ultimate wrong...all these jihadists and 'radical Islamic terrorists.' All that while we've been bombing them for years and causing displacement. But, when Americans do it, whether Christian, Catholic, or 'American-Muslims', we can't call 'em terrorists. No, see, they then become 'nutjobs', 'mass murderers', and deranged individuals... etc. The way I see it, "WE'RE" THE ONE'S WHO THEN BECOME POLITICALLY CORRECT when it comes to our own. We can't call 'em terrorists because ONLY the Middle East can have those!

Here's a good read on OUR history of terrorism:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-shootings-in-america-a-historical-review/5355990


What about this James Oliver Huberty cat who opened up in a McDonald's with an Uzi and a couple of other weapons? Just mental issues? Really? So, Islam can't have people with mental issues that pervert the Islamic faith like the Christian faith does? Gimme a break.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Ysidro_McDonald%27s_massacre#Perpetrator