Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 4:32 pm
You last visited January 23, 2017, 3:52 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

nelson rose weighs in on the internet gambling law


Senator Bill Frist (R.- TN), doesn't want to be President -he wants to be Dictator.


Frist, the majority leader of the U.S. Senate, used his position of power to ram through the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006. He didn't even give the members of Congress a chance to read the bill.


They were told about it late Friday night, mere minutes before they recessed to campaign for reelection. Frist cynically attached his pet anti-Internet gaming bill to a completely unrelated bill dealing with port security, so no one would dare vote against it. No matter how you feel about Internet gaming, this is not the way laws should be made in this country.


The only good thing to come out of this fiasco is we now know what type of hypocrite Bill Frist is. Frist is one of the most active advocates of American values. Well, one American value is that people get to know what they are voting for. Even giving him the benefit of the doubt, that he really cared about Internet gambling, he appointed himself the decider of how America should handle the issue.


But, in fact, Frist never showed any interest in Internet gaming until he decided to run for President. Having run political campaigns, I can tell you he first conducted polls and focus groups and hired campaign consultants. They told him that he could score a few points with his right-wing religious base by coming out against online gambling.


So Frist threw the idea of outlawing Internet gaming into a speech in Iowa, where the first presidential caucuses will be held in 2008. The post-speech polls and focus group must have been positive, because he next announced it as a legislative priority, even though almost no one else in Congress, or America, cares much about the issue. The bill immediately spooked the entire industry. Giants like PartyPoker announced that they would no longer take bets from the U.S. Frist actually managed to cause as much economic damage as an Islamist terrorist attack: billions of dollars were wiped out overnight, when online stocks fell more than 50%.


This was probably an overreaction, since the new law will not actually do much. The only new crime created is accepting funds for unlawful Internet gambling, defined as violating some other federal, state or tribal law. It doesn't make operators much more guilty than they already were. For example, David Carruthers, Chief Executive of BetOnSports, was arrested changing planes in Dallas, and served with a 27-page long indictment. Now the indictment would be 28 pages. On the other hand, Internet poker operators have claimed that they are not violating any federal or state law. If that is true, they are still not guilty of a crime.


This law is supposedly designed to stop money transfers. Bizarrely, banks and payment processors cannot be charged with this new crime. The federal regulators have 270 days to come up with new regulations for these money transferors. But the biggest players, Neteller and FirePay, will take the position that they are not subject to U.S. regulations, since they are not U.S. financial institutions. The only danger is that banks will be told they can't send money to these payment processors. Prosecutors can get injunctions to prevent Internet Service Providers from hosting gambling sites and affiliates, but these already are, or will be, on foreign servers.


Can anything be done about this new law? Unfortunately, no. Using its police powers, Congress can do just about anything to any form of gambling. It just would have been nice if they had read the bill before they voted.

Entry #745


ToddComment by Todd - October 30, 2006, 10:17 am
This is actually not Nelson Rose's analysis of the new law, but it does contain some interesting thoughts.

First, the main point of all of this is the one sentence, "This was probably an overreaction, since the new law will not actually do much."

All the other hyperbole about the "dictator" Frist is a bunch of baloney, and all the reactions to this bill are an excuse to bash on people that such people love to bash on anyway.

Further, saying Congress has "police powers" is just plain dopey. Anyone with the slightest clue about how the 3 branches of government work know full well that Congress has nothing to do with how the laws are enforced, which is what police do.

"Nelson Rose" knows full well that this new bill changes the landscape very little, yet he uses the bill as a launching pad for attacks on Republicans. I think he has said more about his political leanings than his legal prowess.
LOTTOMIKEComment by LOTTOMIKE - October 30, 2006, 10:45 am
i agree with everything you said below.however if frist would've passed this bill the normal way i would've still been disapointed but i would've accepted the way he did it but what he did was very sneaky and the reason he did that was because he knew that was probably the only way it would get passed.the reason i don't like frist is because he didn't do it the regular way.he waited until the middle of the night on a weekend and slipped it into something that he knew nobody would dare vote against.pretty clever but not really fair.......
truecriticComment by truecritic - October 30, 2006, 12:30 pm
Firepay notified me on Oct 20th.....
"Once President Bush approves the Act. FirePay (www.firepay.com) will no longer allow US consumer payments for online gambling merchants. "
konaneComment by konane - October 30, 2006, 1:03 pm
Mike, for as long as I can remember congress has tacked other legislation on to various bills. I don't like that strategy because it's not straightforward but that, unfortunately is the way it's been being done.

I would suggest getting behind Fair Tax which eliminates all federal payroll taxes and unless they come up with some totally brilliant idea should render lottery and gambling winnings as also being tax exempt .... being that they are now considered ordinary income. The federal government could get its cut when stuff is purchased and perhaps that would provide leverage for getting internet betting regulated and opened back up.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.