Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 3:31 pm
You last visited January 18, 2017, 3:03 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Election May Bring Bush Worry

Published:

Analysis: Election May Bring Bush Worry

Published: 11/6/06, 10:25 PM EDT

By TERENCE HUNT

 

 

WASHINGTON (AP) - Running out of time and influence, President Bush

faces a rough road in the twilight of his presidency regardless of who controls

Congress.

The once-unshakable loyalty of congressional Republicans is weakening.

After marching in lockstep with the White House for six years, GOP lawmakers

are looking at the political calendar and thinking about their own futures rather

than Bush's legacy in his last two years in office.

Republicans are in a sour mood, scarred by corruption scandals, held in low

esteem by voters and divided over issues from deficit spending to immigration

reform. Many GOP candidates shunned Bush in their campaigns, fearing he

would hurt rather than help them.

With the end of the midterm elections and the opening of the 2008 presidential race,

Republicans as well as Democrats will be telling the country how they would do things

differently from Bush.

Already a huge headache, the Iraq war hangs over Bush as the dominant issue for

the remainder of his presidency. Even before this year's elections, Republican senators

  • from Virginia's John Warner to Texas' Kay Bailey Hutchison - were questioning
  • Bush's approach to Iraq, which this month will eclipse World War II in the length
  • of U.S. involvement.

If Democrats should take the House or Senate, Bush's problems would only get worse.

Shut out of power for a dozen years and bitter at Bush for ignoring them, Democrats

would demand a role in setting the nation's agenda and throw up roadblocks to the

president's plans. Pressuring Bush on Iraq, Democrats would have subpoena powers

to investigate the president's conduct of the war and to demand accountability.

The White House also could get snarled in Democratic-run investigations of issues

ranging from Vice President Dick Cheney's secret energy policy deliberations to

White House links with Republican corruption scandals.

"It won't be a happy place to work in the next couple of years," said John Podesta,

who has firsthand knowledge about running a White House in troubled times.

He was Bill Clinton's chief of staff during the tumultuous days of the Monica Lewinsky

scandal and Clinton's impeachment.

"Whereas you had a kind of lapdog Congress in the past, you're going to have a

significant challenge," Podesta said of Bush. "Even if the Republicans retain control,

you'll see even more questioning on the Senate side."

With Democrats in charge, there would be little chance that Bush's prized tax cuts

would be renewed. His drive to expand his executive authority and national security

powers would be blocked.

Even with Republicans in control, Bush's agenda has been stalled, his blueprints for

overhauling Social Security and immigration collecting dust.

Time and history are not on his side.

"It seems like most presidents get less done in the last two years than they did in the

earlier part of their term," said Charles Black, a GOP strategist with close ties to the

White House. "Some of it is you don't have as much influence. People are paying

attention to who might come next instead of who is there now."

Before they leave, presidents sometimes try to shape their legacy with foreign

policy victories. Clinton desperately sought a Middle East peace agreement in

the closing days of his presidency but failed. The Middle East offers scant

hope for Bush, too. Trouble spots like North Korea and Iran look bleak.

Bush insists he has a lot to do and isn't slowing down. After the election,

he plans to send Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to Capitol Hill to see

what's possible in terms of overhauling the financially troubled Social

Security and Medicare programs.

"The general approach is to be activist and tackle big stuff," White House

press secretary Tony Snow said. "You've got a very energized and motivated

White House. We're going to see how Congress is in dealing with this.

Maybe it's just wishful thinking but we may be approaching the point

of mudslinging burnout."

Even if Democrats win, Bush still would have clout. As commander in

chief, he is responsible for American forces. There isn't much talk about

Congress cutting off funds for war.

Probably the most potent weapon in Bush's arsenal would be his veto pen

and, almost certainly, a veto-sustaining minority if Democrats took the House.

He also would have the power of executive orders allowing him to make big

moves without Congress' approval. Clinton used that authority, for example,

to protect vast tracts of public land from road-building, logging and mining.

Democrats and Republicans alike suggest there are areas of possible agreement

on issues such as alternative fuel sources and the No Child Left Behind education

law that has to be renewed next year.

A key question is whether Democrats, Republicans and the White House decide

it's in their political interest to get some things done.

"An awful lot can happen in two years," said Leon Panetta, a onetime Democratic

congressman who became Clinton's chief of staff. "In many ways it can determine

his legacy as president of the United States. If there's nothing but gridlock these

last two years, mark my words: He's not going to have a very high place in history

in terms of his presidency."

___

EDITOR'S NOTE - Terence Hunt has covered the White House for

The Associated Press since the Reagan presidency.

Copyright 2006 Associated Press. All rights reserved.

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten

Entry #82

Comments

1.
guesserComment by guesser - November 7, 2006, 11:46 am
Regarding the last sentence: he's not going to have a high (good) place in history regardless of how the next two years go, UNLESS he can totally stop and dismantle world terrorism, and that's not going to happen.
2.
TenajComment by Tenaj - November 7, 2006, 4:58 pm
Just got back from the polls.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.