Yeah, so we sent over a few missiles as a measured and precalculated response...a 'limited strike.' This is exactly what Obama had originally designed and presented but, they never showed any support or approval for it. Between that and the fact that there were more negatives than positives, Obama backed off his 'red line' assertion which wasn't good but it was also still good in a way. He should've never drawn that line but, he felt that they'd give him approval as he didn't want to just strong arm the deal. Trump's first strike last year in Syria was the same plan that Obama had designed but, Trump and his boys actually decreased the the number of targets to hit and the overall aggression of the strike. This is fact. Now, this time, we have the same 'limited-type' strike but it's been said that the number of missiles and targets was doubled while still calling it 'limited and targeted', 'a one-time shot.'

A 'one-time shot'? No, we've already shot twice in tow years while doubling the total launches and targets. This is a clear sign that outside of 'limited strikes', we really have no answer to Syria, folks. I know the following is sad to say but, Syria has no 'real' oil or other exportable resources that the United States wants folks, which is what Trump 'really' meant when he said that it's not in our 'interests.' That's sad. If they had real oil or minerals like AFGHANISTAN, we'd be there and you'd better believe that. *Check on what Afghanistan has under its belt for precious resources. Uh huh. For the record, I'm gonna leave the following article for those TRULY interested in what could very possibly be going on in the 'background' of this whole Syria debacle. CNN's Barbara Star first broke this development in it has since been confirmed in full. This is scary...at least to me.

https://www.transcend.org/tms/2018/03/pentagon-trained-syrias-al-qaeda-rebels-terrorists-in-the-use-of-chemical-weapons-confirmed-by-cnn/