Great vid! If you ain't lying then you don't need to strategize.

Thanks Jarasan. Exactly.

I'd trust Strzok/Strzuk/Smirk about as far as I could throw him. He tells more lies per minute than Hillary. And the Democrats lavish him with praise for his boundless dishonesty and corruption.

Trey Gowdy , love that guy., hope he nails them all.

Thanks KAL. I think he believes the tales he spins. Personally he seriously creeps me out with all the emotional morphing.

Thanks Sully. Me too .. always enjoy watching him.

Yea that Strzok/Strzuk/Smirk is a deep state rat that said "disparaging" remarks about our snowflake president. He also said equally bad things about Hillary (and Bernie and others) and nobody complained about him being on those email investigations. Trump calls people bad things all the time and it doesn't seem to affect his ability to do his job "fairly".
Please explain how these private text messages affected the Trump investigation, but not the Hlllary investigation?
I agree we should do the Strzok level of investigation on the all Russian/Republican members that ran "investigation" (witch hunts that never lead to a single indictment, plea deal, or conviction). Lets look at those emails and texts of THOSE people and if they called her a "bad word" once, we can have 20 hours of kangaroo court and ask the same questions over and over again at tax payer expense.
Yea the FBI and NSA are all part of the deep state that during the 2016 campaign, the FBI released at least twice that they are investigating Hillary but never mentioned the Trump investigation once!
Please explain how the unequal release of the investigation hurt Trumps election and helped Clinton?
Let me just end with these simple stats Trump "witch hunt" done by REPUBLICAN Mueller 32 indictments with 5 guilty pleas. Clinton years of REPUBLICAN ran hearings on Bengazi and Emails resulted in nothing but wasted tax dollars.
And before you snowflakes start crying " but, but none of them show collusion!", I got one word for you, "YET". Mueller is smart, he doesn't show all his cards half way thru the game and he definitely doesn't rage tweet the world about it.

@sarge0202- is that supposed to be a joke? What Hillary "investigation" would you be referring to? The same "investigation" where Strzok/Strzuk/Smirk cleared her before before doing any interviews? LOL

Well there are the 2+ years of CONGRESSIONAL (not FBI) Bengazi hearings that cost 7+ Million dollars and Stzok was not part of. Longest CONGRESSIONAL (not FBI) hearing ever. And there were plenty of Goudy let house committee hearings on the emails. Interesting how Strok can say "bad things" about Hillary, yet "cleared her before doing any hearings", yet Strzok can say equally bad things about Trump and somehow it's a "Deep State" plot. It's almost as if his opinions of a person does not affect his investigation.

Oh yeaaah, Strzok/Strzuk/Smirk was saying such "bad things" about Hillary, for instance that she should beat Trump "100 million to 0", clearly no bias there, Lol. I'm pretty sure you're about to find out you're barking up the wrong tree bringing that leftist claptrap over here on Konane's blog.

Yeaah, Strzok supported Hillary so much, he helped re-open the email investigation that helped cost her the presidency (along with the Russian help). http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-agent-who-sent-anti-trump-texts-also-reopened-clinton-email-probe-2018-1

Meanwhile REPUBLICAN Mueller will keep doing indictments, getting plea deals, and convictions while he builds the case against Trump. You guys are afraid!
It's no "leftist claptrap" it's the truth. But then again, Fox News, InforWars, Britebart and stupid edited clips like this filled with bs comments have lied to you for so long, you have battered wives syndrome. Look at 7:30ish in your "clip". Natler is reading department regs saying FBI can't comment on ongoing investigations. It is not just the FBI! https://www.google.com/search?&q=%22can%27t+comment+on+ongoing+investigations%22
Then at 8:20 there is a rant about "FAKE Russian Collusion". How do they know it's FAKE? Did they have a multimember team of computer experts, russian spy experts, money laundering experts, etc that spent months investigating all over the world? Or did they have Kangaroo Courts and did selective leaks on the Hannity show? I got an idea, let REPUBLICAN Mueller, the guy who investigate Manuel Noriega, Gotti, and others DO HIS JOB!

Sarge thank you so much for your last post on my blog.

You might be more comfortable making your point on your own blog entries..

@ Sarge This must be the "proof" I requested you to post regarding his allegations Pres Trump asked a foreign country to hack our government. Sad to do a drive-by and then won't answer. I used Bing and within a minute or so came up with this.

Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails

July 27, 2016

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

" ....His comments came amid questions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s computer servers, which American intelligence agencies have told the White House they have “high confidence” was the work of the Russian government.... "

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html

Thanks KAL. None of us believe the rhetoric being peddled to CYA, namely theirs. I personally wish they'd go more hard line with questioning.

Latest info I read but don't remember the link is that Hillary's server was accessed by a foreign source they either don't know or are not saying who.

Yes, I would like to know more about that as well! It was a foreign source, but NOT Russsia. Heard it reported sometime yesterday, can't recall where, could have been on Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin's program.

Thanks KAL. Since it was said hacks could be masked as if from another country no telling.