American Bar Association had concerns about Kavanaugh 12 yrs ago Republicans dismissed those

Published:

Entry #25,972

Comments

Avatar lakerben -
#1
Surprise,surprise!
Avatar MADDOG10 -
#2
Oh look. The saint of all saints comments about someone who holds a higher standard than he.
Avatar amber124 -
#3
Well duh!!!

The poor old choir boy.
Avatar Lucky Loser -
#4
This is a joke. Man, the lady that Brett kept claiming to have validated that he wasn't at the said party actually called Ford and APOLOGIZED because she said DEFINITIVELY that it was her LAWYER who made that statement and not her. She then apologized to Ford what happened. FACT. Had Kavanaugh watched and LISTENED to Ford's testimony, which he didn't, he would've known that he was basing his own claims upon a LIE from another lawyer. Furthermore, Ford has her claims in a medical report from 2012 as having taken place but, she simply didn't include Kavanaugh's name at the time. FACT. Yeah, we can argue why she didn't include his name then as he was already appointed and you'd be legit in that regard. However, Ford was trying to prevent him from being picked as a SCOTUS nominee well before he was even in the mix when we look at the current time line.

This guy's temperament is deplorable when we consider how he treated Senator Klochubar! This lady confided in him about how her father has a drinking problem, and, is still currently in AA. What did Kavanaugh do? Hell, he mocked her asking what kind of beer she liked to drink. He also asserted that 'she' may have a drinking problem...and 'blacks out.' What kind of judge does that to people??? Then, he went on a rant about the democrats and how this was just a ploy, basically, since Trump was elected...and that the CLINTONS are involved???? Really, judge??? How in hell can you NOW BE IMPARTIAL WITH THAT ASSERTION???? You cannot, and this will be counted against you in addition to what else is learned in the extended FBI probe which will prove you to be both a drunk and VIOLATOR!

Maybe, just maybe THIS is why you made such an effort to appoint so many women as clerks under you among other things...you're trying to cover up your guilt. Hillary Clinton went through 11 hours of grueling grilling in the hot seat while remaining as cool as a cucumber all the way, bud. You, on the other hand, were CRYING AND SOBBING WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES of your own initial personal remarks before even being questioned! Your own wife knows you're not a choir boy...BY FAR. No one cares about your achieved academics which you solely focused on, okay. We're talking about MORALITY and the fact that you lied on may levels already...especially when it comes to those emails and that Republican staffer. You're a LIAR!! I'll even take another Republican nominee that's CLEAN over YOU EVERY TIME! If you're so clean then, why did it require Flake's and Murkowski's doubts to probe the claims of these women? All you had to do is exactly what Durbin said and ask for the probe YOURSELF. Then, if you're still proven clean, look at how much LEVERAGE you and the Republicans have over the Democrats for delaying the process. You're stupid for not doing it yourself because, now, all it takes is to prove that you were actually AT THE PARTY IN QUESTION...WHEN YOU'VE ALREADY SAID, UNDER OATH, THAT YOU WEREN'T.

*YOU DO HAVE A GAMBLING PROBLEM, DON'T YOU????
Avatar MADDOG10 -
#5
Oh please, anybody have any diarrhea medicine for detective short bus?????
Avatar amber124 -
#6
What's your choice of poison Mad Dog? Where were you in 1982?
That's Michael Savages response to all of this, so laughable I hurt laughing almost on a daily basis.

But what he fails to realize is that 99.999% of the people are not running for the highest seat in the Judiciary System or rather Justice system. Their Average Joe schmoes, so when Michael Savage says every guy's got to have to worry from now on is pure b*******. The average guy is not running for the highest seat in the justice system.!!!
Avatar mikeintexas -
#7
It's obvious no one commenting on the article actually read the article; there was nothing about sexual assault, it was all accusations of bias. (flimsy accusations at that) The ABA once gave him kudos, but they roll them back when he's up for a promotion to a higher court? Anyone with any sense knows they're dipping into deep pockets and adjust their adjust their reviews accordingly.
Avatar mikeintexas -
#8
Strike one of those "adjust their". I don't like to spend too much time anymore trying to educate the most ignorant of those on these blogs and I now tend to pound these posts out quickly and don't take the time to proofread as I normally would do. I definitely am going to start trying to keep them shorter because of the limited reading comprehension of those same ignoramuses.
Avatar LiLSpeedy -
#9
BIGOTINTEXAS, you are an uneducated hillbilly. You need to check your own grammar before you try to comment about someone else's. This is what people do when they don't have anything constructive to add to the conversation. They think it makes them look smart, but it's the opposite of smart.
Avatar mikeintexas -
#10
^ Again with the projection, Sleazy the Crackhead. You define "opposite of smart". I feel sorry for the kids you taught, they came away with learning nothing except racism from you.

I make far fewer grammatical errors than you do.

MAGA!!!
Avatar LiLSpeedy -
#11
BIGOTINTEXAS, the kids that I taught are grown and successful. They are white, black, and other. They still treat me with respect and gratitude for having taught them as indicated by my numerous Facebook postings from them. I pay no attention to what jealous uneducated hillbillies say. The opposite of smart is DUMB, hillbilly.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register