Looks like a long list of....one crime. The rest are just objections to things Trump has done (legally), such as allow seismograph testing ("they're gonna wipe out all the whales!") and lobbing a few tear gas canisters (something Obama had allowed when he was President) at the migrant criminals throwing rocks at the border guards. The rest is just hyperbole and whining...hyperbolic whining? LMAO (except for some premature gloating at the very bottom)

The author of the (hit) piece also threw out the Latin/legal term prima facie, trying to make it sound as though there's evidence galore, but that just means "at first look", not that there's any real evidence. The author doesn't know any more than the rest of us do.

rawcrap.com

And, Trump has yet to be indicted for the supposed single crime. I doubt he will, because if someone lied about it in the first place, then what makes his subsequent testimony any more trustworthy? Let's just wait until the investigation concludes (but that might be an eternity, they're desperately digging for something, ANYTHING to pin on the President). The "joint" analogy in regards to the conspiracy accusation obviously came from a pot-addled brain.

Yep, jarasan, it's not just a hit piece, but a $hit piece .