SUCKER!!!!!

So, if I may, I have a couple of issues I'd like to touch on and I'll begin with Stone first. This guy came up a very long time ago as he was also doing the same thing the rest were...lying about anything Russia and especially the emails. What they did, strategically, is give him a chance to out and lie publicly while they were simultaneously already reviewing all his contacts documents in order to compare what he was saying on air. Mueller is always three steps ahead of all of them and there's no way he would've indicted Stone without solid evidence of his claims. Jerome Corsi even said 'I'm betting on Mueller.' So, all this stuff from Stone about knowing how Mueller is good at getting people to lie in exchange for reduced sentences is simply his way of trying to sway the public view of his indictment.

Every single indictment that Mueller has made is accurate, upheld in court, and this will be no different. Stone has no clue on just how far back Mueller has went with his evidence and this is where Stone's demise will be solidified. He can deny his 'advanced association' with the illegal Wikileaks emails PROCUREMENT and strategic DISSEMINATION all he wants but, Julian Assange will have to disclose where the emails came from, where they went, who received them, who disbursed them from there, which sites they went to from there......AND WHY. The killer is that all the intelligence agencies already know and simply need testimony on record to seal the fate of all of them. Wikileaks was not neutral in this 2016 effort to supposedly 'vet' Trump and Hillary alike with dirt, okay. That's just fine now, though, because as of this past week on 1/24/2019, a brand new transparency activists site called Distributed Denial of Secrets began LEGALLY dumping all sorts of information that Russia has tried to keep under wraps for its own devilment to hurt others. Here:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/this-time-its-russias-emails-getting-leaked

This is a very good read and the cultivated information is provided to journalists and research analysts in an effort to expose lies, bias, and political interference from Russia involving all things Ukraine, Europe, the US, and other places. However, there are a few excerpts of interest I'd like to highlight here.

1) “Stuff from politicians, journalists, bankers, folks in oligarch and religious circles, nationalists, separatists, terrorists operating in Ukraine,” said Best, a national-security journalist and transparency activist. “Hundreds of thousands of emails, Skype and Facebook messages, along with lots of docs.”

2) Russian oligarchs and Kremlin apparatchiks may find the tables turned on them later this week when a new leak site unleashes a compilation of hundreds of thousands of hacked emails and gigabytes of leaked documents. Think of it as WikiLeaks, but without Julian Assange’s aversion to posting Russian secrets.

3) “A lot of what WikiLeaks will do is organize and re-publish information that’s appeared elsewhere,” said Nicholas Weaver, a researcher at the University of California at Berkeley’s International Computer Science Institute. “They’ve never done that with anything out of Russia.”


Yes, I specifically targeted Julian Assange here in #'s 2&3 because it's a fact that Wikileaks has never disseminated anything that would surely implicate Russia's wrong-doing, lying, and illegal activities which clearly illustrates bias in the 2016 election. Yes, the Republican RNC was also hacked BUT, not a single email or other information was ever released. Trump lied saying that the Russians 'tried to hack the RNC but couldn't break through' and we know this is BS. Well, we're gonna present Stone with all this information and much, much more to figure out why no Republicans were illegally exposed. Right now, Stone is a rock star with holding his hands up in peace signs pretending he's not worried about anything. We'll see, Roger, and I'm pretty sure you're fate is already in 'Stone.' Pun intended, sir.


Now, as far as this Covington Catholic business is concerned, my first argument is from a political perspective. Sure, the kids had their right to be there and all and but with the toxic atmosphere that this president has clearly promoted, all the MAGA wear clearly present was done strictly because the cameras would be rolling. Can we find any other video material where all these same kids were donned with such caps all? The answer is no but, what we can find is where these same kids painted their faces and body parts 'black' when attending basketball games. Furthermore, we can clearly see in a picture where these students were mocking a black basketball player that's doing nothing to any of them! He was playing basketball and focusing on his game while they were harrassing him... while he MATURELY IGNORED THEM. Right here since no one else around here has the decency to post the link (not you, amber):

https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/article/2019/jan/25/photo-covington-students-black-paint-basketball-ga/

If them mocking him wasn't, in fact, a racist thing thing then why was there no white players from the other team being mocked in pics? Let's flip this whole thing around, okay. Imagine, if you will, that the protest in question contained all black students of color wearing Black Lives Matter attire, and, a black student was standing in the face of that same native or, even better, a white Christian male while snickering at the slurs being made by his friends. Yeah, that. Do you think that Fox News would be running to their rescue along with this Robert Barnes lawyer willing to represent them FOR FREE? Have a look at the title of an entry right here at the LP Blogs:


-The Hat Doesn't Define Their Character: Why The Outrage Over MAGA Hats Is Undeserving-

*Here's a very good and mature hint for yours truly who posted that entry: Be ready and willing to apply this to other activist groups, within reason, which don their own personally identifying attire while also being exploited by non-productive bad actors. This is what happens when one goes too far one way in an effort to drive their point(s). Did the native have on anything controversial? No. Did Israelites have on anything controversial? No, and it was them that approached the students initially while Philips said nothing but rather attempted peace though drum-beating and singing. The students, on the other hand,were initially 'allegedly' singing slurs and stuff about the wall and going back to the reservation.

Well, after viewing and listening to an extended video, you can clearly hear what was being said by both the Hebrews and the students. Philips was trying to maintain peace when those students should've actually made their way back to where the buses were to pick them up well before the confrontation ensued. Iron Eyes, one of the natives, made it clear that the the Israelites had been harrassing people already and that the chaperones allowing the students to even become a part of something so toxic was irresponsible...hence Philip's move to calm things. The chaperones don't want to accept any responsibility here based on a 'de facto stand our ground' position but, the Catholic Church is in direct disagreement with them...period. So, if Barnes is ready to sue media outlets then, he's better get ready to deal with the Church and its values regarding such issues. I'm betting on the Church.

As always lucky, great commentary with actual facts to back them up, unlike the right-wing agenda.

I don't know if you saw the video I posted a few days back showing the for Catholic kids in an earlier video with black face on. Talk about hypocrisy and denial up the kazoo with these people. If God himself came down and told them they were wrong, they would call up ann coulter and Rush Limbaugh to find out what they should do next. LOL