She still is on Twitter, though.

What gets me is how long it took her to find out there was no "echo chamber" setting.

What REALLY gets me is this: "There are amplified impacts for young people, particularly children under the age of 3, with screen time, but I think it has a lot of effects on older people. "

I wasn't aware there were that many 3 yr. olds on Facebook. Maybe she's talking about the emotional IQ of her admirers/supporters.

WHATT

To me, the only health risk is AOC.

The only ways Facebook affected me was wasting too much time on there, and getting extremely P.O.'d at their shuttering conservative groups - closely monitored by the creators as so to keep out any foul language and threats from the leftists - yet allowing others like "Trump Needs to Die" stay up.

I enjoyed keeping up with my younger kinfolk and reconnecting with old h.s. and college friends, but in the long run, even that wasn't worth it. They have my email address if they want to contact me. So far, only a few have, so they weren't really "friends", Facebook or otherwise, were they?

I think she's butthurt over what Nancy said about her, that a glass of water with a D on it would have gotten as many votes as AOC. For once I agree with Nancy.

Pee-lossy said that? Really? If so, she was 100% correct. Her Democrat opponent just mailed it in, thinking he had it in a cakewalk. I read that his staff had the dirt on AOC w/ her misuse of campaign funds but he didn't want to use it, afraid the electorate was think he was being petty, plus he was positive he had the race sewn up. Maybe his supporters thought so too, because they certainly stayed away from the polls in droves. I think it was something like 13% of eligible voters showed up, right? That's shameful, and I hope those who didn't vote now regret it...I sure as hell regret their ignorant apathy.