The real reason we're more likely to elect a woman in 2020
Published: June 23, 2019, 7:22 am
Comments
You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.
Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.
Quick Links
![]() ![]() The time is now 3:16 pm You last visited May 21, 2022, 1:48 pm All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) |
The real reason we're more likely to elect a woman in 2020Published: June 23, 2019, 7:22 am Entry #26,842 CommentsYou must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog. Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In. |
We try to include instructions on each page. Check for help content on the page that's giving you trouble.
The next place to seek help is our dedicated Help forum that contains detailed assistance for frequently requested topics.
If something isn't working properly, our automated Browser Test page can quickly identify common problems.
Finally, the Contact Us page has an incredible wealth of self-help material that answers 95% of the questions we are asked.
We always welcome feedback and suggestions.
About Us • Site Map • Membership Features • Advertising Opportunities • DMCA • Change Log • Rules • Privacy • Linking to Lottery Post
Index of Feeds • Lottery News • Event Calendar • Latest Forum Posts • Web Site Change Log
Search the news, forums, blogs, and even your private messages at our Search page.
This page was generated in 0.0273 seconds.
Copyright © 1999-2022 Speednet Group. All rights reserved.
My take: Unsound logic, since the Republican candidate will be Trump and unless the Libertarian/Green/Whatever Minor Party* nominates a woman, there will still only be one woman.
*And, while it pains me to say this and I truly wish it were different, since when have third parties EVER mattered? I'd love for one of the Democrat women to run independent, pull a "Ross Perot" and spoil it for the Dems.