Cable Industry Expert: Broadcasters responsible for increasing cable costs

Published:

Give us a la carte choices so we can choose the programs we want to see. I pay for sports broadcasting and have absolutely no use for any of it. 

Cable Industry Expert: Broadcasters responsible for increasing cable costs

https://youtu.be/UsHYzkL_8Qk

Entry #5,791

Comments

Avatar sully16 -
#1
The cost is ridiculous.
Avatar konane -
#2
Thanks Sully. Yes it is.
Avatar mikeintexas -
#3
I've been screaming for ala carte programming for years and the last straw was the local cable company bragging about all the channels they provided. Sheesh, there were a half dozen shopping channels- free to the cable co.- and after doing some research, I found other "minor" channels that only charged a few cents per subscriber.

And, the plethora of sports channels was just too much, too.   One ESPN channel would have been nearly one too many for me and I probably would not pay an ala carte price for Fox News, much less CNN, MSNBC, etc.   While there were a *few* programs on the major TV networks I would have watched, I wasn't for sure the price per subscriber they charged....billed to me w/ a hefty markup...was worth it.

Plus, there's always some dispute between some network and the cable companies and losing that channel until they worked out a new contract.   Plus, I never could understand why we actually had to pay all that much for cable anyway...I mean, aren't we having to sit though adverts anyway? I thought that was how the networks paid the bill long before cable.   I can understand having to pay a bill to help keep up the cable company's infrastructure, but pay extra for the channels when that's basically getting charged double, counting the commercials?

It will be a slow death, but cable TV is dying. There is some great quality programming from the streaming services like Netflix and other outfits like YouTube are offering reasonable subscriptions for premium content. Even the major networks are either letting people watch for free on their websites or are also offering subscriptions.   

That said, I do not feel like subsidizing ANY company that either insults me with their programming, allows someone who works for them to insult me or allows ads for companies that like to insult me. I can watch ANYTHING I want to watch online. It might not be legal, but it's a crime for the networks to slander me or overcharge for mostly an inferior product.
Avatar konane -
#4
Thanks Mike. I guess the networks are suffering because they're running out of ideas for entertaining non-social-engineering programming so have resorted to forcing things on us.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register