- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 1:07 am
You last visited
April 26, 2024, 7:01 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Twitter is banning tweeters again.
Published:
A real good friend of mine lost their posting privileges on Twitter today and they brought up the First Amendment again. I decided to use my "that's a shame" and "oh wow" looks, because I didn't want to explain exactly what the First Amendment says.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The last time I looked Twitter, Facebook, and other social media platforms including this one are not arms of the the U.S. Congress. And before joining almost every social media platform, we must agree to the site's terms and conditions. IMO it's really simple; if we want to post or tweet, we have to agree to their terms and conditions.
I suppose there are a couple of "no holds barred" social media sites, but probably not very many.
Comments
All these folk who complain about Twitter flexing their muscles by blocking them forget that they are visitors on the site. In short, go start up your own twitter-like outfit and scream from the mountain tops, no one is listening anyway- especially politicians who think this is their world, and we just live in it.
Or just a wanna-be drive-by crap spreader because you have no blog? https://www.lotterypost.com/blog/120566
Wonder which one, both, or neither the religious right will find more offensive, obnoxious, or creepy. The Billy Bush interview or Rudy talking about peeking at a lady golfer's underwear. Opps, I forgot Graham and Falwell called the "grab them by the *****" remarks locker room Trump speak.
And the MAGA people still can't figure out why over 60 courts didn't take Rudy's voter fraud arguments seriously.
You darn well know that had Twitter not acted the way they did, we would be still be getting flooded with “ l was robbed, there was fraud .” Most of all, he would have twittered some nasty nonsense on the inauguration & taken the thunder away from Biden. The guy never quits. Now l read that half the gop voters would abandon the party & follow Trump if he started a new party- how do you spell insanity, and we wonder how rational folks left the US mainland and followed Jim Jones to Guyana, and that didn’t end well as we all know. What the hell is in this Kool-aid?
They might even nominate Trump for sainthood after hearing the Supreme Court ruled a Manhattan DA can subpoena his tax records.
If any of his family members (those not facing criminal charges) want to take over the party, it will mean creating a new party.
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register