After saving MONTHS of handwork in excel with a new LRS VB6 engine, I can say without doubt that out-of-position repeats are definitely NOT a factor.

Testing over 4000 draws on cash5 and almost 1000 in powerball, LoopRS produces much lower counts than the strictly positional LRS.

I am finishing up May with the new numbers for P3/P4/C5/PB straight off the LRS sheets, and will be working towards the next phase for June... Error Correction!

This one is lifted directly off an old powerball sheet I had, basically it will grab the difference between the drawn numbers and the LRS numbers and fiind the most common one (for each position). June's test will be strictly on paper (except for the powerball) unless the may test makes me some more playing money...

LRS with the enhanced VB6 test for Sunday May 13th 2007

Pick3 for tonight in PA... 1-0-3

pick4 for tonight in PA...  0-4-0-8

Side note, based on backtest results I am still playing the pick 3 straight only, but I'm upping the ante by 50 cents and boxing the pick4 as well as straight... already missed $100 this test by not boxing the pick4 :-(

new Synch-O de May-O test will cost $105.00 (pro-rating the fact that I did NOT box p4 for the first 12 draws)

I am growing weary of P3 "one hit wonder" systems, and wish I could stumble on a PB "one hit"... onward and upward!