The Following is Like an Argument in the Study of Philosophy (For Those Who Might Be Interested)

Published:

If it's the case that some people out there in the world believe that it's really possible to predict the lottery with some limited degree of accuracy, then the question arises: could someone with a big enough computer, (like say a mainframe computer) be able to forecast the entire contents of the next day's newspaper (for example like the Dallas Morning News or some other big city newspaper)?

 

The question being raised is: does the second follow in any way as a mathematical exercise or principle from the first?

Entry #3

Comments

Avatar hearsetrax -
#1
would be like asking the Watson super computer

its all even money till the numbers are drawn .......
Avatar lgojer1234 -
#2
The difference between the two hypothetical propositions is that the first one is logically smaller in terms of the number of variables than the second one which would logically require like a hundred thousand times more variables to make it work, (given that it could somehow work).

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register