Was there more than one Arizona independent audit?

Published:

Just wondering because orange45 is giving a very different outcome than his Cyber Ninjas reported.

Entry #138

Comments

Avatar grwurston -
#1
They've got some more work to do, but sounds like fraud is there.
https://rumble.com/vmye2m-ariz.-audit-results-released-friday.html
Avatar Stack47 -
#2
I'd give your "rumble. com" a LMAO if wasn't meant for Trump's pitifully stupid supporters that believe anything orange45.
Avatar Stack47 -
#3
The real problem is some people did and still do believe the "big lie" and many of them decided to act on January 6. At the end of that day Biden was still certified as President and now many "big lie" believers are in jails, waiting to be sentenced, or waiting for the trial dates.

It's not the first time in our history where both the House and Senate are divided by ideology and won't be the last. In a little over 13 months from now we'll be electing 435 House Reps and one third of the Senate. And what happens between now and then will decide that outcome.
Avatar grwurston -
#4
You can go on Rumble and watch the entire election audit hearing live in the Arizona State Senate. The only other place that might have shown it is C-Span. But I don't know if they did or not. I think youtube may have broadcast it too. But I've found Rumble to have a better video/audio feed.

The good thing about watching something like that live is, you know exactly what was said. No media spin, no one pushing their agendas from either side. You get it straight from the horse's mouth so to speak.

Click the link in my first post. When you get there, type Arizona Audit Hearing in the search box and scroll down to it.
Gotta agree with you on the House and Senate being divided. It would be good if they could actually agree once in awhile and do things for the good of the people and the country, and put our needs first, rather than the lobbyists and all the special interest groups. We can only hope...
Avatar lakerben -
#5
Only a complete idiot would believe this "Audit" because it republican run .
Avatar Stack47 -
#6
It was simply some inexperienced people hired by the Arizona Senate pretending they were doing audit. Whatever they find or believe they found is totally irrelevant and changes nothing.

Has nothing to do with that election or any other election being rigged, but by pretending they were rigged, they can tighten up election laws in red states making it more difficult for people leaning towards Democrats to vote. And they are counting on McConnel's Supreme Court to back them up.
Avatar noise-gate -
#7
* It is also in play to please the " Base." Doing nothing for the fallen Ex President is a career ender. Better to say " l tried" even though you yourself knows it's BS, because it's all about the show, and the show must go on despite people being tired of it.
Avatar grwurston -
#8
There was more than one audit firm conduting the audits, it wasn't just Cyber Ninjas.
Contrary to your statement about making it harder for dems to vote. Reforming election laws is making it easier to verify the people who vote are who they say they are. Up until 2020, you voted in person on election day. Not 2 weeks before or 2 weeks after. That way has worked perfectly fine for centuries. No need to change it.
Let me ask you, if you went to another country do you think you would be allowed to vote in their election? You live in Kentucky, do you think you should be allowed to vote in Va, Tenn, Ohio or another state? Would you want me to come from Md to vote in your election? Of course not. But that is what happened. If you watch the hearing you will see the exact numbers of who did just that. And that is only one county.
California just passed a law making vote by mail ballots permanent for every registered voter. How many of those may NOT be American citizens?
Is it neccessary to list all the things that could go wrong? Mail in ballots is what caused the whole problem in the first place.
I'll close with this. Let them do audits in all 50 states. If there was no cheating or fraud, then that shouldn't be a problem for dems or repubs. And if they prove there was no fraud they can say, Told ya. But dems are against the audits. Why is that? And if fraud is proven then it needs to be fixed. If we can't have fair elections, we're no better than China, NK, Iran or any other third world country.
Dems or anyone resisting audits, is kind of looking like Brian Laundrie right about now.

Avatar Stack47 -
#9
"Let them do audits in all 50 states."

FYI, according to the United States Constitution, the same document you either never read or can't comprehend, each state decides their election laws and how their votes are recorded. So regardless which conspiracy website you read, whatever "them" find will not change the outcome.

"And if they prove there was no fraud "

Pitifully stupid doesn't even come close to explaining that idiotic statement! State and Federal judges dismissed more than 50 election lawsuits because plaintiffs failed to prove their allegations.

Ever hear of "burden of proof" and did you miss where Rudy's law license was suspended for making false and misleading statements about the election results? When it's all said and done, Rudy and Sidney won't be allowed to argue in a kangaroo court.

Why not post your ignorance on someone else's Blog. You lowered the average IQ on this Blog entry by 50 points.

Avatar grwurston -
#10
We were having what I thought was an intelligent and civil discussion. And that was nice...
But that just ended. Apparently the old saying is still true:
“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

It was fun while it lasted. Goodbye.
Avatar Stack47 -
#11
"I thought was an intelligent and civil discussion."

Before making the entry "you're apparently very upset about", I wanted to read something on your Blog and saw this:

"This member has blocked you from posting a comment in their Blog"

Are being a hypocrite and a pathologically liar a MAGA membership requirement too?

You really ought to find someone to review what you say because much of it is pitifully stupid and doesn't deserve an answer. For instance.

"You live in Kentucky, do you think you should be allowed to vote in Va, Tenn, Ohio or another state?"

Are you saying "I lost the debate" because you asked me if I think people should break the law and vote in several different states? My thoughts on the guy voting for his dead mother and mother-in-law are just as irrelevant because I didn't tell him to break the law either.

"California just passed a law making vote by mail ballots permanent for every registered voter. How many of those may NOT be American citizens?"

Why do think that I could possibly know "how many" or even make a guess? The key words are "registered voter" and several people were caught in many states voting for dead people. In Colorado Barry Morphew is a suspect in the death of his wife, but that didn't stop him from voting for Trump in presidential election on behalf of his wife. Did you win because I don't know or won't take a guess on the number of people voting illegally in California and other states?

"Up until 2020, you voted in person on election day. That way has worked perfectly fine for centuries."

FYI, people voted by mail during the Civil War. But it wasn't until 2000 that Oregon became the first state to move to an all-mail voting system. So congrats, you're only off by 20 years.

Even prominent Republicans said the "Ninja audit" was a waste of time and money but that won't stop you and others from spreading more false information. And by the way, saying someone's comments are "pitifully stupid" is not slander in the real world.


Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register