- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 1:23 pm
You last visited
April 25, 2024, 11:22 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
is wal mart good for the economy?
Published:
i love shopping at wal-mart and save a lot of money shopping there but i hear hate for it in some circles.how is it bad for the economy? how is it good for the economy?
Comments
Also, their scrupulous methods of dealing with vendors is atrocious.
The warehouse stores can offer cheaper prices because they cut back on what I consider the most important aspect of a store...service. The only real value they offer to their customers is exercise. Walking is good exercise and you get plenty of it wandering around these labyrinths looking for a product or an employee to help you find it. After 20 minutes in the store wandering around you find what you need and get more exercise standing in line at the one open cashier...it's exercise for the neck as you crane it looking for one of the other 11 cash registers to open up.
I grew up in an area without any WalMart or KMart stores. New England states (especially Vermont) have always fought against the huge warehouses because they destroy the old fashioned Mom & Pop hardware & grocery stores. Even the most loyal customers need to watch their budgets. The good news is that they create jobs for a lot of people, although the wages are very low.
Last week I drove to a WalMart that is about 5 miles down route 41. I won't take up your time writing my whole experience, but they didn't have the air conditioning filter I bought last month, and I just wanted to find out if they stored any in the back. I hunted around for help and couldn't find anyone. I went to the customer service desk and the man looked at me as if I were from Mars. Basically, what you see is what you get..don't ask. Last month I stopped on a Sunday at a Super Walmart to get my tires balanced. He was very nice and didn't charge me, since he admitted he couldn't balance my tires properly, but I wish he never started. Boy, did he screw up my wheel balance! I already had a slight vibration, which is why I went there, but my steering wheel never shook. On the way home, I hit 70mph and thought we were having an earthquake. So I paid a dealer $39.95 to balance the tires. (eventually replaced them - long story) When I had my Hyundai I broke down at night, so I had no choice since WalMart was the only store open. The tow truck took me there. They sold me a battery that didn't fit my car and it shifted. I broke down the next day. (How would I know?) So you need to know exactly what you need before you walk in, since they sell products, but don't know much about them. Guess you get what you pay for. I won't ever go there for automobile service again. Too risky.
An employee helped me get her to a chair near the exit, but before she even sat down, a woman appeared with a release form, asking Mom to sign it. I snatched the clipboard out of her hand and read it. The release stated that she had fallen when she became dizzy from standing up too quickly, and that she agreed not to sue Wal-Mart. I have no idea how they produced such a document with such incredible speed, but there it was. I handed the clipboard back to the woman and told her that Mom wasn't signing anything until she had seen her doctor. The woman told me to "go ahead and have the doctor bill Wal-Mart directly," which we did. A few weeks later, Mom received notice in the mail that Medicare had denied her claim, and that she was responsible for the $587.00 bill.
Needless to say, I was pretty hot. I called Wal-Mart headquarters in Arkansas, and the guy I spoke with told me that Wal-Mart has some kind of contract (I think he called it an "insurance lien") with Medicare to pay their claims. I've never heard of the federal government making such deals with open-market corporations, so I told him I'd give this information to my attorney and they could sort it out. I paid the bill (Mom's Social Security is her only income), and gave all my documentation to my attorney. They soon made an offer of $1,000, but I told them it wasn't enough. They suggested that, if we weren't willing to settle for a reasonable amount, then maybe we'd like to take it to court.
Well, I thought that was a fine idea. I had taken pictures of Mom's face and knees, and of the wires that were wrapped around the legs of the stool (ironically, I bought the disposable camera while we were still in the store). I instructed my attorney to make it happen. TWO DAYS later, Mom received a $2500 check in the mail, along with a release form which stated that nothing that had happened to Mom was Wal-Mart's fault, and that she agreed never to sue them for anything ever again for the rest of her life. I gave it to my lawyer, and told him that Mom would settle for that amount, plus the medical bill and attorney fees. After making a copy, I tore the release into small pieces and told my lawyer to send it back.
They paid the entire amount about ten days later, without a release. However, they stopped accepting checks from either of us. If we go to Wal-Mart, we have to pay cash now.
I don't hate Wal-Mart, but I do question their unethical business practices. Some things are more important than low prices on mediocre merchandise, so you can blame me if they raise prices a penny or two in order to make up the money they lost on Mom's claim.
They are many many other websites about Walmart and it's labor practices. Just search Walmart Bush
http://wakeupwalmart.com/
In my career, probably the bulk of my experience is dealing with cargo transportation, so I have seen these business practice first-hand. The transportation business really changed once Wal-Mart and Home Depot came around, because they are so big that they can dictate incredible sweetheart deals. The same goes with every other aspect of their business.
For example, with the vision department that Jim talked about in his story, I am sure they build that department after the analyzed that industry from all perspectives, and squeezed every ounce of profit out of every part. From deals on the equipment (bought in bulk), to the chemicals, the tests, product placement, analysis of foot traffic into the main store after a visit, to the eye doctor him/herself. After everything is figured and analyzed, they decide to open that business, and the byproducts are (a) lower prices; (b) people going there because of the low prices and convenience; and (c) traditional eye care business losing business and maybe going out of business.
Think of that same model for every aspect of their business. But they are not *bad* people, and they are not an *evil* corporation. That's just what has to happen in order to build stores like that -- and they would not exist unless *tons* of people shopped there every day.
And I'm sure as far as Jim's story about the quickly-produced release form is concerned, the analysis of the business probably showed them how many millions per year they could save by having a computer in the store ready to produce a custom release form ready instantaneously.
Jim, I'm very sorry to hear about your mom, I hope she did not suffer any lasting effects from the incident.
I was present several times when people were told to clock out and THEN finish setting up their mods. More often than not, those people would donate a couple of hours of their time two or three times a week, because they were terrified of losing their jobs if they refused. Many lawsuits spawned from this practice, but my manager told me that Wal-Mart didn't worrry about such actions. He said that corporate practice was to simply tie the matter up in court until the plaintiff ran out of money or died (his words, not mine).
I was screwed out of 29 hours of overtime because the personnel manager kept "forgetting" to submit it. I never did collect that money. I started at $9.00/hr, but another guy who hired in shortly after I did was paid $7.50/hr for doing the same job. This is common in that company.
Space won't allow me to list every infraction I witnessed during my tenure in the bike cage, but you can rest assured that Wal-Mart considers the law to be a minor obstacle which is easily overcome by throwing money at the problem. I was successful in my suit against them because the amount didn't qualify for federal court. My attorney told me that the first thing Wal-Mart does is to file a motion to move the case, ANY case, to the federal level if the potential damages could exceed $5,000. If you've ever been involved in a federal lawsuit, you know that it can be prohibitively expensive, regardless of whether you're the plaintiff or the defendant. I think that's why they settled with Mom so quickly. When I wasn't intimidated by their threats of "taking the matter to court," they knew they might lose much more. The final settlement was fair, in my opinion, as Mom was compensated adequately for the pain she suffered.
About a month after this incident, we went to Wal-Mart to buy a vacuum cleaner for my newlywed niece. I wrote the check, and the cashier told me that they couldn't accept it. When I asked why, she said that the system wouldn't process it, so I can't write a check at any Wal-Mart anywhere in the world. We were told the same thing when Mom tried to write a check there a week or so later, so we've both been "black-listed." A petty response, to be sure; neither of us has ever bounced a check there, so there can be no doubt that this was meant to convey the message, "We no longer want your business."
Todd is absolutely dead-on in his assessment - there is a cost attached to those low prices, but the lure is irresistable; I still shop at Wal-Mart occasionally. How can I avoid it?
Is Wal-Mart good for the economy? Well, I guess the answer to that question depends on whether you're a fan of a global economy. Wal-Mart has certainly opened a few doors for some nations, such as Malaysia, to enter and compete in U. S. markets. But this is directly countered with the relatively recent practice of corporate outsourcing. "Made In America" was nothing more than an advertising slogan; Wal-Mart has NEVER limited their inventory to American-made products, but many people believe that was the case. Now, they don't like Wal-Mart because they've "added foreign products" to their shelves. Such an attitude is counter-productive and naive; a company the size of Wal-Mart could not survive if not for their high margin on products made overseas. That's just the way things are.
I neglected to mention that my mother recovered from her injuries, and she was doing well until that kid rear-ended us a year ago. Now, she suffers from chronic back pain. A few months after the crash, they discovered that she had a broken L-1 vertabra, which may or may not have been a result of the collision. They couldn't rule it out, though, because her injuries were "consistent with a rear-impact trauma." It could also have happened simply due to her age. Her vertabra is now healed, but she still has pain. She's currently being treated by a pain specialist in Columbia City, and he seems very confident that he can correct it without surgery. I appreciate everyone's concern, and I'll keep you apprised of her progress.
Excellent topic, LOTTOMIKE!
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register