I'm thinking an outhouse reporter would be better than these Charlatans.

They want to believe the lies, victims by proxy, same bunch that's got participation trophies lines up on the shelf.

MSNBC Has a new motto.

If something happened and we say it didn't, then it didn't.

If something didn't happen and we say it did, then it did.

Was there ever a time, when the press printed the truth? I believe it started during the Viet Nam War, when the lies began. Where do we find the truth?

Judge excluded a lot of evidence, the prosecution wanted to present, that if the jury heard, would likely have seen a different outcome (and it would have been a deserved outcome). The Judge made some very biased and inappropriate decisions there (this in addition to the prosecution being so terrible). But If you honestly believe RittenHouse to be a victim here, then I don't know what else to say here. OJ Simpson was acquitted of his charges, would you also say he's a victim?

It is not a private citizen's job (more certainly not a 17 year old) to take up arms and show up to any community to do the policing. Law enforcement is supposed to have that job. The idea that RittenHouse is some sort of hero here, because he didn't like that there was some looting taking place, so therefore he felt the need to takeup arms and show up and try to "protect that community". That is not his job.

I don't know if you saw his recent post trial interview with Tucker Carlson. Do you honestly think he took an AR-15 to that protest to "support BLM" as he alleges? I know you don't believe that. If the right-wing believed that, they would likely be turning on Kyle RittenHouse instantly. RittenHouse was obviously on the militia side. There are pictures of RittenHouse putting up white supremist hand signals with others in the pic who are known to be White Supremist, but Kyle was going to this protest to support BLM? LoL.

But to my original point. There was so much evidence that was dismissed and not allowed in court, which includes a video of RittenHouse talking about wanting to use his weapon against people who he believed were shoplifting. This showed intent on what he was intending on doing with that weapon. But it wasn't allowed in court. Every part of that trial was honestly favorable to the defense / it was rigged in his favor.

But like I said originally (in my past post). Based on the videos shown at trial, which showed self defense. Based on those videos, you could reasonably feel like he needed to defend himself with a weapon. But lets not forget (if you are insisting RittenHouse is a victim), that he put himself in a situation that no one should have been in. It is not a private citizen's job to be a vigilante and to enforce the law.

So you put yourself in a situation that is dangerous, then you kill people, then you argue that you had to kill people because you were in a dangerous situation...smh...

and then on fox news trump drooled over that kid thinking,my son i wanted.

pick3master3838 said:
But like I said originally (in my past post). Based on the videos shown at trial, which showed self defense. Based on those videos, you could reasonably feel like he needed to defend himself with a weapon. But lets not forget (if you are insisting RittenHouse is a victim), that he put himself in a situation that no one should have been in. It is not a private citizen's job to be a vigilante and to enforce the law.
*********************************************************************************
Dude, let me tell you, if you come after me with a weapon in your hand, hollering and screaming and trying to take my weapon, you can bet your A$$, I'm going to shoot you... period. I want you to look at that video again and look at his finger on the stock of the AR, then look where the pedophile had his finger on his weapon. And then trying to take his weapon??      BOOM you're dead.

You're missing the point dog, intent matters, he shouldn't have been there, he doesn't belong there he's not a cop he's a vigilante he went to look for trouble. He put himself in a dangerous situation and then claims self-defense when that dangerous situation arises.

None of them should have been there, this is called a lack of leadership within the elected officials, people have the right to protect their property, they have the right to hire people to protect their property, the cops were told to stand down, good people had to step up.

All I'm hearing is that he's white, white white white, white this white that, sounds a whole hellava like racism.

And that's why businesses have insurance, just for that type of reason. Stop giving that fool excuses as to why he should be there. Carrying an AR-15.

I'm guessing the cops we're told to stand down for a good reason. What I don't understand is why didn't he just shoot them in the legs or thighs, that'll bring you down quick without killing you.

There is never a good reason for allowing that type of mayhem, and it does not matter whether he should of been there or not, he has a Right to defend his life, he did not provoke, every single day in this Country, there are self defense cases, everyday, some never get charged, some go to jury, some are dismissed,
Never give up the right to defend your life, doesn't matter if you go to a riot, to the store, or to a gender reveal party, you have a right to defend your life.

CARBOB, I think the lies began further back. Nov 22, 1963. It could have been before then, but it became obvious to some people at that time.

Sully... yes if I was walking down the street minding my own business, then I have every right to defend myself, this was not the case with Kyle, sorry but I totally disagree with you.

People keep saying saying Rittenhouse shouldn't have been there with a gun.
He was looking for trouble, he's a vigilant, having a weapon proved his intent, etc, etc.

But no one any where, the media, reporters, protesters, etc, has asked why Grosskreutz was there with his gun.
Why is that? How is it different with him?

or that Rosenbaum was from Texas, he crossed state lines.

None of that is relevant because the people both of you mentioned didn't use a gun 2 kill somebody. If they did, we'd be asking the same questions. Boy oh boy, how many types of pretzels will you be trying to twist yourself into? Be careful you could hurt yourselves LOL

2 had guns 1 was going to beat him to death with a skateboard, but i know, he's white.

In fact if you were watching the trial, one of the rioters said, he aimed his gun at Rittenhouse and that's when Rittenhouse aimed his gun and shot him in the arm, But I know, he's white.

Until they pull the trigger, it's not the same.

Save you stupid BS Joker, they intended to kill him, play your stupid childish game somewhere else.

Joker writes:
None of that is relevant because the people both of you mentioned didn't use a gun 2 kill somebody. If they did, we'd be asking the same questions. Boy oh boy, how many types of pretzels will you be trying to twist yourself into? Be careful you could hurt yourselves LOL.
***********************************************************************************
It is relevant. (1) it's a free Country, no restrictions. Go wherever you like. (2) the two forementioned went there to start trouble. Did you miss the video with one of the loudmouths calling a black person a (ni$%#r) on film?, they went to start trouble!
(3) until you can prove he didn't go there to help people, your case is nullified. You leftist pallbearers always say the same thing over and over again. If I said Black, you would say white. you and your cohorts should start a detective agency. All of you would be hits in the cesspools of Idiocy for sure.

CNN or msnbc, would likely come to you for a story. I can see it now: joker38 would be the head detective, while stagnant11 would be the secretary because he's easily offended and afraid by avatars and watching people coming out of the infirmary with blood dripping down their arms, and lastly would be Nikita Goof would just be the company gopher. You could name the company, " The three mullions ".
It's really sad that BS isn't sold by the yard, you three would be billionaires in no time.

P3,
Here's the crux of the whole thing in my eyes: The video shows Kyle running away for his life being chased by these violent leftist pedophiles, wife beaters, burglars, mother beaters and other criminal miscreants.
THEY were chasing HIM. He was NOT chasing them. He was running AWAY from them. It was clearly a violent mob chasing him down for no good reason. They finally caught him and tried to stomp his head in and smashed a skateboard over his head.
He did what he had to do to save his life. They may well have beat him to death or possibly shot him to death. The one criminal was pointing a gun at him. WTF would you have done?
Whether you think he shouldn't have been there or not is immaterial. It means nothing. There was nothing he did that was against the law. He wasn't chasing and assaulting anybody, they were chasing and assaulting HIM!
HTF could you watch that video and say he was the bad guy? That is insane!

Pick38383838, would let someone aim a weapon and fire at him before he returned fire , he would defend himself after the fact, or maybe he wouldn't defend himself at all, maybe he would just call a councilor .