"Trained in facts and evidence and documentation"

Published:

The full quote is from a post in the News Forum, "Fortunately, I think most non-attorneys know that attorneys are trained in facts and evidence and documentation and tend to have a great deal of intellectual curiosity."

I'm not a attorney but card carrying lawyers like Sidney Powell are not always interested in facts, evidence, or documentation.  Didn't have to look very hard to fact check Powell's "No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact" to disprove the above "opinion?".

Powell's claim was about the Dominion voting machines being programmed by Hugo Chavez (who died over seven years before the 2020 election) so Trump would lose the election. The point of her nonfactual evidence was have a court rule that Dominion give Powell's team a machine so they could find out how Chavez programmed it. 

Read where a group of computer experts examined one of the Dominion machines but won't give any details of their facts without a link to the story.

Entry #321

Comments

Avatar noise-gate -
#1
* A couple of days ago they showed this piece on Hackers at a Vegas conference who were presented with the task of attempting to prove that they could hack into it and change whatever results it previously produced.

* This experts had access to open the machines up & apply whatever software to the existing machinery & they all failed. The head honcho opening said “ it’s not possible “ given that the software that had been built into the machines had fail safe’s against such intrusion. In short: Those particular machines were safe, so where does this “ machine switching votes from this guy to that guy comes from?” From the same insane world of the delusional voters who cannot & will not accept reality.

* Reminds me of that comedic piece where this woman tells this guy “ No one breaks up with me, l will tell them when it’s over, not the other way round.”
Avatar rdgrnr -
#2
And we're supposed to believe a source called "Hackers ?"
You're easily convinced of anything you want to believe, ain'tcha boy?
Avatar noise-gate -
#3
* it was live on TV, closed minded one. You easily convinced that the election was stolen, after all the POTUS said it, so it has to be true. Presidents don’t lie, especially Trump, when he opens his mouth pearls from heaven flow out.

* A President that was twice impeached has to be telling the truth. We all recall him crossing the lawn & holding up a Bible in front of a Church. The man is God fearing, a true believer in truth & Justice, a man who would never take the 5th.
Avatar rdgrnr -
#4
Oh, it was live on TV?
Well then, why didn't you say so?
Everyone knows that when something is "live on TV" that it's the absolute truth!
Because NO ONE would ever DARE try to do anything that was completely dishonest on "Live TV!"
What a silly goose I am.
They have to get up pretty early in the morning to pull the wool over your eyes, huh?
I'll bet you were watching those Democrats, er, I mean hackers, like a hawk to make sure they were REALLY REALLY trying hard to hack those machines, right?
Yessiree Bob!
Avatar Stack47 -
#5
Not saying it's fact, but evidence was presented showing how the actual 2016 vote count was changed in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The difference between the two candidates was less than 100,000 in all three states combined.

The compared to 2020 when over 1 million votes separated the two in those three states combined. Which would be easier, switching about 20,000 votes in a few selected locations or 300,000 in several?

The Georgia "change the vote" demand in Georgia made absolutely no sense because it had zero effect on the outcome. And then evolved into criminal investigation. But some people are still easily convinced. Did Trump ever hire a real good lawyer to represent him in Georgia?
Avatar noise-gate -
#6
* What a genius you are. This was not “ America’s got talent” fool, these were professional hackers that were specifically hired to break into the voting machines & to let the public know whether software could be changed out to give an opposite result & the answer was No.

* Funny how you and others were peeing in your underwear when Powell said that  she had evidence of “ biblical proportions “ regarding the 2020 election & how it was stolen. Then that silly female threw in Hugo Chavez into the mix concerning the voting machines- that’s when the herd scattered, including myself.

* Remember when Pillowman said that Trump was going to be returned to the White House & Kennedy Jnr was going to be his running mate? Yeah, you were all for that & it’s amazing that no one has told Mikey to simply “can it or sit this one out.”Someone is giving Pillow high 5’s on his so-called evidence because he keeps getting invited back on TV & Bannon’s show. I guess you folks want to see him bankrupt himself- how cruel.
Avatar Stack47 -
#7
Watched a six-minute YouTube video "Hackers tore apart voting machines. Here's what they found" and it was done trying to find out if the machines could be hacked and re-programmed. Don't expect any Trump lovers to be educated enough understand how hacking works but didn't think they would prove it by making even more pitifully stupid comments voting machines.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register