- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 11:50 pm
You last visited
April 26, 2024, 11:03 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
CR Initial Results Erratic...
Published:
Some seeds took as long as 4,000 loops to pick their number, some took 7, several took 1 (The same 9 from the last test).
there are only 1,000 combos... so there is a definite problem. The code is right on the money, I am just wrong with my seed assumption (whole date number, INT process)
I have 3 more variations...
Date+0.5,INT
Date,Round
Date+0.5,Round
I am currently running Date+0.5,INT... Still lets me browse, a definite improvement over it's ancestor the "Coincidizer" which held this PC hostage for upwards of 11 hours... This takes about 60 minutes at normal priority. ONLY because some numbers require several hundred and several THOUSAND loop iterations.
I already have VB's RANDOMIZE sensitivity threshhold identified at 0.5, and I have seen a marked improvement over LRS versus this CPU generated game...
looking for about 200 hits of the 1597 draw history before I start playing for real.... A number I am NOT likely to see considering so far the best is 9...
and no apparent practice draw patterns have emerged.
Unfazed by the initial noise, I move onward... (hopefully) to Victory!
Comments
done all 4 scenarios, no good results :-(
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register