The bottom 90% need help not the top 1%

Published:

Lowlife consevatives plain suck! 

Entry #228

Comments

Avatar JAP69 -
#1
The top 1% need to put more intelligent people in charge of their operations. The bottom 90% end up bailing out the top 1% for failing in their leadership abilities.
Avatar CDanaT -
#2
What happened to the other 9%, where did they go and what are they doing ???
Avatar jarasan -
#3
rob reich played peck in Willow.
Avatar sully16 -
#4
Someone explain to Joker who the top 10 % are, they control the media, medicine, banks , the crooked politicians.
They laugh their butts off when tax the rich goes around, they are the ones who tell the people they control to say it, they use class warfare, then you vote for their candidate.
Lizzie Warren wrote many of the tax codes, then she went around and sold her services to big corps. because she knew where the loopholes are.
When you say help for the little guy, you mean welfare? free free free free is what you mean.
If you it the lottery big, you sure as hell would use every loop hole to your advantage.
Avatar Pick3master3838 -
#5
1.9 trillion tax cuts for the top 1%, and corporations is welfare, Bailing out the farmers is welfare. The republicans have no agenda whatsoever. Their main priority is to get rid of drag queens and ban books. Republicans can kiss my ass. Both cheeks. Their agenda is not about making America great again, Their sole agenda is to own the libs and that's all. Pathetic pieces of s**t.
Avatar sully16 -
#6
your going to have a heart attack , those stupid farmers, always trying to feed us.
Avatar Pick3master3838 -
#7
Sully, But at the time republicans like Sean hannity, were telling his viewers that whenever you get into trouble financially, You should pull yourself by your boot straps and get 2 or 3 jobs. But not farmers. Hypocrisy.
Avatar Coin Toss -
#8
Karl Marx would be so proud of your posts Pick3master3838. 

He might question you being on a lottery website though.
Avatar Pick3master3838 -
#9
And Hitler would be proud of you coin loss!
Avatar jarasan -
#10
and...................no one not a single person is proud of you nosepicker.
Avatar Pick3master3838 -
#11
Oh look, I mentioned Hitler and look shows up, the dictator wannabe lover. Jaracrapper..👎👎
Avatar Stack47 -
#12
Why don't any of you MAGA Kool-Aid drinkers talk about Republicans wanting to lower your SS, increase your Medicare payment, and raise the eligibility age to over 70?

Bet there are at least four people posting here that are on SS.
Avatar lakerben -
#13
I'd settle for a cheese burger and a beer.
Avatar CDanaT -
#14
Stack, why don't you name the four that are.... I know that Sully and I aren't. So that leaves you and pick3 and Jarasan and CT and lakerben.  Which network made that official declaration about SS reduction by the Republicans ??    Clowns Not News ? or More Snowflakes Needing Black Crayons ?
Avatar sully16 -
#15
Welp, yet another Alpha Male has called you out Stack, nobody here has said a word about SS ,I am months away from collecting SS there is no way I want it reduced , the age changed or any sort of awful changes, I would not vote for anybody who even remotely suggested it.
Just another scare tactic by democraps and the biden chugging chuckleheads fall for it.
Avatar sully16 -
#16
and Joker, I would rather the stinking rotten bloated good for nothing Government help our Farmers then the corrupt aholes in Ukraine.
why aren't you complaining about that? Did you Zenensky doesn't tolerate Gays, he has them executed, surely Biden sending him our money must upset you?
Avatar Pick3master3838 -
#17
Sully, what we sent to Ukraine is 1% of the military budget, and it wasn't cash, but equipment. It's also beneficial to fund them, to help fight Russia, our enemy. Secondly, AGAIN, just like  I wrote here a couple of weeks ago, in the 1990's the U.S. and Ukraine made a deal that if they gave up nukes, we would help them in any way to defend themselves, so we're obligated to help. Man.... I feel like all you repubs just sit around all day listening to fox and newsmax, and don't do your own research. What a sad state of affairs for this country.

@Cdanat, have you been living in a cave? Of course the republicans want to raise the age to 70 for ss benefits, are you really that misinformed? 156 republicans voted for it. I'll post the proof here, and in my blog. You people live under a rock. Always voting against your own interests, only to own the libs, but screwing yourselves in the process, and not even realizing it.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTR7mHsFU/
Avatar Pick3master3838 -
#18
https://truthout.org/articles/republicans-are-working-on-making-70-the-new-social-security-retirement-age/
Avatar CDanaT -
#19
Actually Pick3 because you post "something" here, it is not the full 100% truth. And just so you fully understand something, I don't follow anyone on this site because I am my own normal hetero male, who doesn't life by the words of computer cowboys/cowgirls. I am the kind of realist that lives by my word and not by someone elses. I don't get up and look at the news every single day to see what idiot voiced their opinion or had a thought on Fox/CNN Tic Toc/Twitter or FALSEBOOK. I have between zero and 2% trust in our government agencies of being truthful.  It especially applies to Democrats and Bernie or Angus.  When I can see what is put forth in a budget, executive order or law proposal that can affect me, then I will get more involved. What some mental midget interprets verbiage of what someone else thought is never a good way to live your life. Man up or Woman up or Trans up and do a thorough investigation into controversial facts. As we know today, corporate media and extremists on either side can slant something so badly, where the news was supposed to report things in a neutral fashion, so you could decide. We all know how the game is played in Disneyland(D.C.) "here you want this porkbelly project so give me that porkbelly gift."   Here is what I do know. Our current President is not looking out for you or me. PERIOD. He has very noticible diminished skills as a human being and shouldn't be the leader of the (non) United States of America. Then again, neither should Hardly-speaks-clearly Harris. I for one will be so glad when Nov/24 rolls around and a change comes to the next elected leader of this great nation. We can't afford 4 more years of this clown we have now. Having a houseplant as a leader never allows a nation to grow.
Avatar grwurston -
#20
Back in 1983 Biden and the dems increased the retirement age from 65 to 67 and increased the taxes paid on SS benefits.
https://www.ipi.org/ipi_issues/detail/if-cutting-social-security-is-a-scandal-then-biden-did-it-first
Here is how Congress voted on it.
https://www.ssa.gov/history/tally1983.html

In 1995 Biden proposed freezing all SS and Medicare benefits.  https://twitter.com/i/status/1124438095225655296

And now he's accusing repubs for what he himself did 40 ago in 1983 and again 12 years later. The blame game never stops with this guy.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register