After the c conversion, the speed boost was over 4,000% from python and guess what the top list was... it exactly matched that list I generated from follower data...

So for the first hypotheses we can say that you might be able to bump your luck up from 10% to 14%, which means we can probably accept the null hypothesis that numbers systems do not increase your odds of winning in any meaningful way.

We can also reject the null hypothesis that the best results do NOT come from follower data. Of 10,000,000,000 iterations of lists against winning numbers, the best list matched the follower data exactly... I mostly went through this exercise for nothing but the education.

It took 28 hours without overclocking and only analyzing the pick 2 evening data. Same result in python would have taken 13 years...

On to the next idea... awaiting inspiration.

Happy coding!