Studying where the numbers in the " neutral zone" are sitting with respect to their 10% expectancy may offer more answers than studying the extremes. It might take a re-framing of long held beliefs in higher frequency being the better bet (one of the pillars of the Gail Howard systems). It is true that the drawn numbers don't know if they are hot or overdue, but what if some larger truths are governing how the number frequencies fill in around the central tendency of the expectancy.

Something I would have missed without adding the short term analysis to the last few scripts.

Pick 3 will be the proving ground, and being a per column function, eventually moving to add the pick 5. Still a long way from a live test, still trying to plan out interpretation of the output, but work is underway!