* l think Madison’s interpretation needs to looked upon in the light of what an enemy is. People who crossed the border in those days were not rounded up because they looked different- this guy makes up he’s own interpretation of what suits his agenda.

* Clinton winged it when he said “ it depends on what is means.” But that was based on a question in a sexual connotation. Trump wants to go down in history as a President that broke the rules. However the more he comes up with goofy orders the more scholars of the law raise their eyebrows. But he has that clown of a professor on Fox who interprets everything law related to lean Trump’s way. What the H is his name again, a real circus performer.

* Oh yeah Turley.

An article written by a man who has a "Bachelor of Science - Supply Chain Management 95-97" from Michigan State University (his Linkedin page).......Yeah, I would definitely take his words of wisdom on Constitutional law.....Right up there with the likes of Pocahontas......

* Right. The guy is an advocate for free speech & had no problem giving a thumbs up for the impeachment of Clinton, over a BJ mind you & concealing it- since after all, it was Personal.
* Yet this man you so admire led the charge to not see Obamacare passed, and also objected to Trump being impeached. The guy is a toad.

Hey cdànat I would take a garbage mans word over what Trump says.