Must be smartphones.

Or stupid looters.

Mostly peaceful folks..Right Mayor ?..Gavin, you're all good with this ?...it's over that $900 mark...

Poor babies.

* Where was your passion for justice when your kin stormed the capitol on Jan 6th & killed law enforcement officers? You up in arms about iPhones? People the world over recognize stupidity, thanks for showing your true colors. Look in the F mirror…

No body killed LEO on Jan 6. Stop being so stupid.

* You a stupid F, you love to claim you do research you clueless moron. Well researcher, why not go to google and ask “ were any police killed during Jan 6 th” AND see what Ai reports comes up with you. Unless you think Google is run by Democrats.

* Stay the F in your stupid lane. Gee, you a glutton for punishment ain’t you? You need to get laid, perhaps it may clear up your head.

* Before you make excuses- the results of the actions by your brothers on that day contributed to the officers demise.

* Now about Trump’s dog collar with Stormy..

is ai always correct
Google says
No, AI is not always correct. AI models, especially generative AI, are trained on vast datasets and produce outputs based on patterns learned from that data.
Here's why AI isn't always correct:
Reliance on Training Data: AI is only as good as the data it's trained on. If the data is incomplete, biased, or flawed, the AI's output will reflect those flaws. For example, an AI trained on biased hiring data might perpetuate gender or racial biases.
AI Hallucinations: AI can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical information, even confidently presenting it as factual. This is known as "hallucination" and can be a significant challenge to identify.
Lack of True Understanding: AI systems lack human-like comprehension and don't "understand" the information in the way humans do. They process data to identify patterns, not to grasp nuances or context.
Contextual Issues: AI can struggle with understanding context, especially in conversations or complex situations, leading to errors in decision-making.
Dependence on User Input: The quality of AI output is also dependent on the quality of the prompts or queries provided by the user. If the input is unclear or includes flawed assumptions, the AI may return an inaccurate answer

is ai always correct
Google says
No, AI is not always correct. AI models, especially generative AI, are trained on vast datasets and produce outputs based on patterns learned from that data.
Here's why AI isn't always correct:
Reliance on Training Data: AI is only as good as the data it's trained on. If the data is incomplete, biased, or flawed, the AI's output will reflect those flaws. For example, an AI trained on biased hiring data might perpetuate gender or racial biases.
AI Hallucinations: AI can sometimes generate incorrect or nonsensical information, even confidently presenting it as factual. This is known as "hallucination" and can be a significant challenge to identify.
Lack of True Understanding: AI systems lack human-like comprehension and don't "understand" the information in the way humans do. They process data to identify patterns, not to grasp nuances or context.
Contextual Issues: AI can struggle with understanding context, especially in conversations or complex situations, leading to errors in decision-making.
Dependence on User Input: The quality of AI output is also dependent on the quality of the prompts or queries provided by the user. If the input is unclear or includes flawed assumptions, the AI may return an inaccurate answer

Googled, Were any cops killed on Jan 6. Found this on wikipedia.  Months later, however, the Washington, D.C. medical examiner reported that Sicknick had died as a result of two strokes, classifying his death as due to natural causes.
Three other cops committed suicide weeks or months later. If you commit suicide you take your own life. That's our own choice.
So I was correct .

* In all my time being on the internet & visiting multiple websites- YOU, are the dumbest individual l have " ever encounter " in ANY time period, and l am Dead serious when l post that, and yes, you wrong, very very wrong!

* Try to think, you certainly haven't since you got mixed up in the Maga propaganda. Are you ready to think? Let me guide you along since your frontal lobe is underdeveloped.

* As an example By your estimation  or research calculation: Agent Orange used in Vietnam was a hoax, those birth defects by wives of the servicemen who were there & other health related issues could not be tied to the chemical.

* What l am getting at is that, You think they unrelated,  just as you think that the beatings & phycological stresses from the assault on LEO on the hill was purely coincidental, these officers just " decided" to take their own lives for no reason whatsoever- what brilliant thinking. Wow, it's a beautiful day,  l think l will go ahead and kill myself.

* Have l made it very clear that you a 4th stage cancerous tumor? Well if not, always remember that you are,  in my humble opinion.

* For good measure, l will add another example,  remember Bernie Madoff? He carried out a Ponzi scheme that destroyed the financial lives of thousands of people,  it resulted in some of those people " committing suicide " Now you going to say the lose of those folks lifesavings is Unrelated to the Bernie's action. Yeah- you smart, so smart l want to throw up in my mouth, but won't.

The maga experts are wrong as usual.  Liby,liby.liby!!!!

There you go again always changing the subject. We went from looters stealing phones, to J6, to Bernie Madoff, what's next? Nixon, bigfoot, mermaids? You make no sense have the attention span of a gnat. I'm tired off wasting time with you. I'm tired of dealing with your dumb ass bs. AMF!!

Gr.....lololol... Just ignore Safari boy....You can't ever educate the nebbish. But I will give you an A+ for effort.

* Sure, says the 4 stage cancerous tumor. Like l said, stay the F in your lane and go back to your polluted maga blogs.

* Precisely LB. We get banned from their useless blogs, and they get tired of their own crap and decide that it is best to troll us here. I take no delight in posting stuff like this..

"  In all my time being on the internet & visiting multiple websites- YOU, are the dumbest individual l have " ever encounter " in ANY time period, and l am Dead serious."

* One would think it would give them pause and re evaluate themselves, but no. If you think l am a fool, why the F would you even respond to my posts UNLESS you looking to elevate your sordid status and claim you know how to bring your A game to the party. This cut and paste shxt don't fly here. Their leader has poll numbers in the 30's and they will not talk about that. The silly parade was a disaster, and one look on the felon's face during that shxt show showed the world that he was a mega fool. Defend that instead acting like you know what you talking about. i hope l never hear from this tumor again, but hey...