I know what I must next do, run the big back test script on the Cash 4 Life to get hard data on the occurrence of all neutral draws in the window. I may have to adjust the Standard Deviation scalar to try and minimize the amount of digits in the neutral pool, while still holding a respectable NNNNN rate per window. It took an hour to run on the pick 3, but that was 16,800+ draws.... this one will be run, adjust the scalar, run again. May take days...

All of the calculations change in a non replacement draw scenario... variable expectancy per digit, number of training draws to allow 10 fair chance draws per ball, the hot line, the cold line, repeats across columns...

All to leave it to a QP generator in the end.

But I know it is an 85% chance per window in the pick 3, and a 52% chance per window in the pick 5... why? Because I ran the back test... the only way I will know for sure is to run the C4L back test... which is not quite 100% coded... I would say I am 85% there.

Plan remains the same... pick 3 needs to work to fund the rest... perhaps next week I try cutting the high and low neutrals to make a smaller set...

There is also the option of C4L getting a single pick per column... that would be the easiest modification.