Sen. Clinton.

Senator Clinton

Ron Paul, even if it has to be a write-in vote.

Donald Duck, John Wayne, Woody Woodpecker, Elmer Fudd, \

None of the above. Whoever it is should have prior Military experience in their resume.

I can see right now that probably 90 percent of the females on the site will say Hillary Clinton just because she is a female and nothing else matters.

reddog, obviously you give women little credit for their personal choices and their intelligent decisions. So what you are saying is that everyone who voted for Bush and the 42 men before him did so because they were men? Did every Catholic vote for JFK? Do you feel every Black is going to vote for Obama and they aren't going to look at the issues? That was a very sexist comment.

One more comment to Reddog
I've read your blog comments for a couple of years. You always chose Bush over Kerry and Gore. So how can you possibly make such a statement about military experience when you are a Bush supporter? He didn't even complete his training in the National Guard!

Good points, Nancy.

i wish gore would run again.

I can see right now that probably 90 percent of the females on the site will say Hillary Clinton just because she is a female and nothing else matters.

The above statement could easily be turned around and replaced "females with male" because women don't SUFFER from blind male pride like men do. Men do stuff on account of male pride even to the point of everybody must die. From the words of my oldest daughter "I ain't never seen nothing like it"

with

I can see right now that probably 90 percent of the MALES on the site will NOT say Hillary Clinton just because she is a female and nothing else matters.

THAT STATEMENT reddog IS TRUER FOR MEN. Women don't have that pride thingy going on.

There probably is some truth to Tenaj's statement. But in either case, MOST men and MOST women would not vote for a President based on gender alone. Those that would are fools.

Sen. Clinton

Todd and several others have the right spirit about another 4 years of "Clinton Fraud" (they are consummate Frauds)!!

Ron Paul makes the most sense, but lacks the Machine money to make a serious run.
Newt Gingrich would be my choice, altho' he's not currently a candidate.

i don't hear a lot about fred thompson....

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008_Speculation.htm

Thanks, Tenaj. Good link.
Lottomike, recently I read that Thompson is still in the running, but lost a lot of points when he called Russia the Soviet Union. He's made some other mistakes, and this is not the time to do anything that the press or your opponents can criticize. The general consensus among voters is that he's lost track of current issues.

For the record, I probably will get slammed on this, like I said, I wouldn't vote for none of the above. But I didn't say I wouldn't vote for a female for President. I would have liked for Condalea Rice to have ran. I would have voted for her over any of the above. She has a lot of intelegence.
I work around 300 people daily and hear what is being said . Most of the women want either Clinton or John"The Bret Girl" Edwards for president because of the bonding they have with these two and their fenimine side. The majority of the Afro Amercican's her at work, that are registered voters, which aren't many, are pulling for Obama.
Now, these are facts from being and working in the public and actually seeing and hearing what people think and not from sitting at home and surfing the net and reading .org sites that are ran by a bunch of bias liberals.

Mrs. Bill Clinton