Setting up the slide rule concept

Published:

So, the main idea is to slide the columns forward so that the number in the last draw row matches the actual last draw. The question becomes how far forward to slide...

Since the most wild per column statistic is variance, there seems like a logical target.

For a pick 3 example, the evening variance on the draw from 3/24 (6-0-5) was...

Column 1 ... 4.8, go back four sixes (or 5 sixes if rounding)

Column 2 ... 6.04, go back 6 zeroes

Column 3 ... 2.22, go back 2 fives

In this way there is a definitive starting point. The decision to use the most significant variance digit or rounding can be back tested. Also, initial exploration does not require any coding, easily tested in a spreadsheet.

The result would be a list of combos to play... and the date to play each. If I were to run the experiment today, it would yield

Last draw from yesterday

One combo for tonight, one for Friday, one for Saturday all the way to Wednesday.

Simply play the number for that indicated date. You win or you lose (or you paper play). That easy!

Maybe the variance is not the best solution, but any hits on this (or any other "system") are purely coincidental at best. Back testing is equally simple, just pick an earlier date and " slide " the data down to see if there was any luck from doing that in the next 7 draws.

Now I chose variance, which is data that I gather from the last 150 draws in my classifier function in my app, you can use any arbitrary source, such as 5 back on every column. (Not 5 rows, the 5th appearance of the last winning number).

If it proves as useless as every other way during the spreadsheet testing phase, then it can die there without ever writing a single line of code. And paper play is always within the budget!

Entry #648

Comments

Avatar Il2c -
#1
Try for pick 2 and Post some code. I'd like to see what u come up with. Also, in my opinion,  you'd have better luck with this if you created a script that outputs 10 box combos ($5 play) using whatever static or dynamic variables you prefer. Just no math.random() please. :]
Avatar hypersoniq -
#2
There would be no need for math.random() for this project. I am not a believer of playing multiple combos, any more than 1 and I am essentially betting against myself... plus it makes budgets get ugly quickly. For what amounts to a coincidental win (if any), I am ok with a one shot guess at the full thousand to one odds.
Avatar Il2c -
#3
I never thought of that. You are right.
Avatar Il2c -
#4
Writing algorithms 💪

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register