- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 1:16 pm
You last visited
June 7, 2026, 2:27 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Trump DOJ Demands Judge Who Had Noisy Encounter In Chambers Recluse Herself From 2020 Election Case
Published:
Updated:

Comments
Maybe you should close off an area and install some beds so they can take a sex break any time they feel like it.
* Where have we seen this before? Oh l know- the ( find me X amount of votes) in Georgia. Instead of focusing on that serious issue, it became : Willis having sex with the prosecutor.) Your BS is always transparent, why? Because l see through you & you BS, it’s the reason l own you!
Try to keep up.
Since you didn't answer my question we shall assume you DO let your employees have sex breaks at work.
* l experienced the same shxt when l was 16 years plus, you watched that shxt in an adult store booth you lil pr*.
Try and keep up. It said ALLEGED. Look up the definition.
* What happened to your brain in your youth? Was it always this clueless & void of any sense of deduction & reasoning?
This link is the PDF of the complaint that was filed against the judge. I got the link from the other NY Post story truesee posted about this on 5/29.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit
FROM: Special Committee Appointed to Investigate Judicial Conduct
Complaint No. 11-25-90212
DATE: December 10, 2025
RE: Amended Final Report of the Special Committee
https://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/judicial_complaints/11-25-90212%20Judicial%20Council%20Order_0.pdf
In the Summary it says in part: During its investigation, the special committee corroborated the primary allegation regarding the affair and the sexual activity in chambers. In the midst of the investigation, the Subject Judge recanted the initial denial and admitted to the affair with a law enforcement officer, INCLUDING sexual intercourse in the judge’s office during working hours. The Subject Judge also eventually admitted another allegation—that the Subject Judge attended a
partisan political event.
Emphasis mine.
Both of you Bozos really need to learn how to keep up. Also try posting some actual facts for once instead of your nonstop STDS bull sh*t that you get from the fake news.
PS This is the kind of reporting a real journalist would do.
* Why is it only you- cause you get handed your lunch here. Are you the * Fall guy? The one who takes it for the team? To be honest, you not good at the bs you push. I would like to try someone else, or is there someone else or just you? I think you being used, don’t you?
* l mean you proven time & again that you & your ilk are wrong. Jarasan, that insane b*h will only repeat the same 2-3 lines and nothing more. Apart from that hideous F, it’s just you. Slim pickings indeed.
* Your ghoul tried to get his slush fund off the ground by attempting to reward the J6 insurrectionists with taxpayers money. You have no answer to that- avoid my questions at all costs. Here’s something else you won’t read on rightwing sites.
* Trump’s DOJ tried to get something in trade: Get the slush fund going & none of his family members will get a cent from it. In return- the DOJ will make sure that Trump & family are not audited by the IRS from this point moving forward.
* Your felon seems to think that since the High court insulated him from prosecution while in office, that it extends to family dealings which may be legit or not. The Judge in the case wants to see receipts. The day of reckoning is coming & when the shxt hits the fan, just be advised, you heard it here first.
The True Journalist.
If you click the links in the articles and get the complete story before commenting you won't end up looking like such a big dumbass. It was right there. The judged admitted it in Dec 2025, which means it wasn't "alleged" it was a fact. But there you are trying to cover up for the judge claiming it was "alleged". Come to think of it are you doing the same thing at your job? Banging the secretary, HR manager, or whoever on company time? Cause you obviously think it's okay and don't have a problem with it as you said in post 5. Is your business actually a brothel?
The best part is watching you trying to get out of all the bs you make up by changing the subject and posting paragraph after paragraph (post 11) of completely irrelevant stuff. It's a dead give away every time. It's like watching a 4 yo trying to convince his mother he wasn't eating ice cream when he has the container in his hands and it's all over his shirt and face. LOL
One more thing. No goofing off at work tomorrow. You got a business to run. So if you're on here you ain't working.
Presbyterian Healthcare Services (PHS) is laying off 150 administrative employees and discontinuing most of its Medicare Advantage plans for 2027 to void mounting financial losses and improve operational efficiency. The Albuquerque-based health system's decisions are driven by several key factors: Eliminating Financial Losses: Presbyterian's Medicare Advantage plans alone were operating at a loss, costing the system roughly $59 million annually. The changes are aimed at stabilizing their broader financial footing.
Widespread Insurance Pushback: Like many health systems across the country, PHS has struggled with the administrative challenges tied to Medicare Advantage. Nationwide, hospitals are increasingly dropping these plans due to excessive prior authorization denial rates, delayed claim reimbursements, and interference with patient care.
Streamlining Operations: The 150 job cuts affect administrative roles such as sales, IT, and operations, rather than direct patient care. In fact, the health system is actively trying to hire for hundreds of open clinical positions across its clinics and hospitals.
Why don't doctors like Medicare Advantage plans?
AI Overview
Doctors often dislike Medicare Advantage plans because private insurers impose heavy administrative burdens, frequently deny necessary patient care, and offer lower reimbursement rates than Original Medicare. These managed-care hurdles divert valuable time from patient care to bureaucratic red tape.
The most common frustrations medical professionals have with Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans include:
Excessive Prior Authorizations: Unlike Original Medicare, nearly all Medicare Advantage plans require doctors to get advance approval before providing treatments, tests, or procedures. Navigating this process forces medical staff to spend hours on the phone or submitting paperwork, frequently causing treatment delays.
Frequent Denials of Care: Insurers frequently deny or delay coverage for treatments that a physician considers medically necessary. When a claim is denied, doctors and their staff are forced into a lengthy, resource-draining appeals process.
Lower Reimbursement Rates: Original Medicare has a standardized, reliable fee schedule. In contrast, private Medicare Advantage insurers often negotiate lower payout rates. These reduced reimbursements can make it financially difficult for smaller practices to operate and cover their costs.
Strict Network Restrictions: Medicare Advantage plans operate as managed care, limiting which specialists and facilities a doctor can refer their patients to. Physicians dislike being forced to navigate restrictive, constantly changing networks when coordinating the best possible care for a patient.
Burden of Complex Rules: There are countless plan variations, each with its own unique coverage configurations and rules. Keeping track of these varying requirements on a patient-by-patient basis increases administrative overhead and contributes to clinician burnout.
Because of these pain points, many major medical groups and independent doctors are actively dropping out of Medicare Advantage networks. To learn more about industry-wide grievances and trends, you can explore the insights on KFF Health News or view specific coverage issues through the Center for Medicare Advocacy
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register