Did you catch that? The NIH wouldn't let us interview the studies lead author, so we went to Boston and found THE ONLY STUDY CO-AUTHOR NOT EMPLOYED BY THE NIH.

In other words, we (the NIH) are paying you to do this study, and you didn't give us (the NIH)  the results WE WANTED. And now we're pissed.

Seems the key word is 'paying' for a specifically designated result. I feel increasing the quality of our food supply would work wonders to help resist the flu.

Any time you see a study the first questions to ask are, Who is doing the study, and who is paying for it.
Because they want the "right" result so they can sell you the pill.

As Dr. Henry Ealy says, "Let thy food be thy medicine, and let thy medicine be thy food.

"But watch for the CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a round about way by vaccinating more children and others around them who could give them the flu".  She nailed it!!

What they mean: We have a flu shot that doesn't protect the elderly.  So we want YOU to get the flu shot that DOESN'T WORK, so that YOU don't give the flu to the elderly, because the elderly aren't protected by the flu shot that doesn't work.

Sounds just like the logic they used during covid to "protect" Granny and Grandpa.

They won't say it today because the big 3 networks and Fox are getting $7 billion a year in drug company advertising revenue.