Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 5:26 pm
You last visited January 21, 2017, 4:32 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Compares "climate alarmism" to decades of communist rule he experienced ...


Last Edited: May 28, 2008, 9:47 am

Sums it up really well.  My take: Illuminati losing control creating wars for profit, control global banking  ......... global warming alarmism the Illuuminati's new profit$$$$ generating cash cow.  One world government under the gui$e of $$$$$aving the environment. 


Plant trees, bare root seedlings are cheap and easy to plant.  Water gel (which is used in disposable diapers) is a soil amendment that cuts down on watering a year or two while seedlings become established.



Czech President Klaus ready to debate Gore on climate change 
Posted : Tue, 27 May 2008 21:21:02 GMT
Author : DPA 

Source EarthTimes.org
" Washington - Czech President Vaclav Klaus said Tuesday he is ready to debate Al Gore about global warming, as he presented the English version of his latest book that argues environmentalism poses a threat to basic human freedoms. "I many times tried to talk to have a public exchange of views with him, and he's not too much willing to make such a conversation," Klaus said. "So I'm ready to do it."

Klaus was speaking a the National Press Building in Washington to present his new book, Blue Planet in Green Shackles - What Is Endangered: Climate or Freedom?, before meeting with Vice President Dick Cheney Wednesday.

"My answer is it is our freedom and, I might add, and our prosperity," he said.

Gore a former US vice president who has become a leading international voice in the cause against global warming, was co-winner of this year's Nobel Peace Prize. Gore's effort was highlighted by his Oscar winning documentary film An Inconvienent Truth.

Klaus, an economist, said he opposed the "climate alarmism" perpetuated by environmentalism trying to impose their ideals, comparing it to the decades of communist rule he experienced growing up in Soviet-dominated Czechoslovakia.

"Like their (communist) predecessors, they will be certain that they have the right to sacrifice man and his freedom to make their idea reality," he said.

"In the past, it was in the name of the Marxists or of the proletariat - this time, in the name of the planet," he added.

Klaus said a free market should be used to address environmental concerns and said he oppposed as unrealistic regulations or greenhouse gas capping systems designed to reduce the impact of climate change.

"It could be even true that we are now at a stage where mere facts, reason and truths are powerless in the face of the global warming propaganda," he said.

Klaus alleged that the global warming was being championed by scientists and other environmentalists whose careers and funding requires selling the public on global warming.

"It is in the hands of climatologists and other related scientists who are highly motivated to look in one direction only," Klaus said.  "



Here it comes!!!!!!!


"Every adult in Britain should be forced to carry 'carbon ration cards', say MPs
By David Derbyshire
Source MailOnline

"Every adult should be forced to use a 'carbon ration card' when they pay for petrol, airline tickets or household energy, MPs say.

The influential Environmental Audit Committee says a personal carbon trading scheme is the best and fairest way of cutting Britain's CO2 emissions without penalising the poor.

Under the scheme, everyone would be given an annual carbon allowance to use when buying oil, gas, electricity and flights.

Anyone who exceeds their entitlement would have to buy top-up credits from individuals who haven't used up their allowance. The amount paid would be driven by market forces and the deal done through a specialist company.

MPs, led by Tory Tim Yeo, say the scheme could be more effective at cutting greenhouse gas emissions than green taxes.

But critics say the idea is costly, bureaucratic, intrusive and unworkable.

The Government says it supports the scheme in principle, but warns it is 'ahead of its time'.

The idea of personal carbon trading is increasingly being promoted by environmentalists. In theory it could be used to cover all purchases  -  from petrol to food.

For the scheme to work, the Government would need to give out 45million carbon cards  -  each one linked to a personal carbon account. Every year, the account would be credited with a notional amount of CO2 in kilograms.

Every time someone makes a purchase of petrol, energy or airline tickets, they would use up credits. A return flight from London to Rome would, for instance, use up 900kg of CO2 credits, while 10 litres of petrol would use up 23kg.

MP Tim Yeo MP, says the scheme could be more effective at cutting Britain's greenhouse gas emissions

Mr Yeo, chairman of the committee said personal carbon trading rewarded those with a low carbon footprint with cash.

'We found that personal carbon trading has real potential to engage the population in the fight against climate change and to achieve significant emissions reductions in a progressive way,' he said.

'The idea is a radical one. As such it inevitably faces some significant challenges in its development. It is important to meet these challenges.

'What we are asking the Government to do is to seize the reins on this, leading the debate and coordinating research.'

The Government is committed to cutting CO2 emissions to 20 per cent below 1990 levels by 2010.

The Climate Change Bill going through Parliament aims to cut emissions by 60 per cent by 2050. The Government has said it backs the idea in principle, but it is currently too expensive and bureaucratic.

Environment Minister Hilary Benn said: 'It's got potential but, in essence, it's ahead of its time. There are a lot of practical problems to overcome.'

A Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs report into the scheme found it would cost between £700million and £2billion to set up and up to another £2billion a year to run.

Tory environment spokesman Peter Ainsworth added: 'Although it does have potential we should proceed with care. We don't want to alienate people and we want everyone to be on board.'

But critics say the idea is deeply flawed. The scheme would penalise those living in the countryside who were dependent on their cars, as well as the elderly or housebound who need to heat their homes in the day.

Large families would suffer, as would those working at nights when little public transport is available.

It would need to take into account the size of families, and their ages. There is huge potential for fraud.

Matthew Elliott of the Taxpayers' Alliance said the cards would be hugely unpopular. 'The Government has shown itself incapable of managing any huge, complex IT system.' he said.


Every adult in the UK would be given an annual carbon dioxide allowance in kgs and a special carbon card.

The scheme would cover road fuel, flights and energy bills.

Every time someone paid for road fuel, flights or energy, their carbon account would be docked.

A litre of petrol would use up 2.3kg in carbon, while every 1.3 miles of airline flight would use another 1kg.

When paying for petrol, the card would need to swiped at the till. It would be a legal offence to buy petrol without using a card.

When paying online, or by direct debit, the carbon account would be debited directly.

Anyone who doesn't use up their credits in a year can sell them to someone who wants more credits. Trading would be done through specialist companies."


Entry #822


time*treatComment by time*treat - May 28, 2008, 12:49 pm
We cannot forget the bankers who will facilitate the trading of these credits.
konaneComment by konane - May 28, 2008, 3:26 pm
Thanks time*treat! Yes they're already counting their profit$$$$$$.
jarasanComment by jarasan - May 29, 2008, 9:01 am
Psycotic alarmist holier than though hypocrite environmentalists should just recycle themselves directly into landfills if they practiced what they actually preached, that would be a good start. Reminds me of a joke where there is a bus full of lawyers going over a cliff................

These people need to be shut down, now.
konaneComment by konane - May 29, 2008, 10:37 am
Thanks Jarasan! .... And the gullible lemming-sheeple believing their pronouncements need to pull their heads out.
Comment by MeFirstYouLast - May 29, 2008, 12:23 pm
It is amazing that the best three people that mankind can provide, one of which will make decisions on the future of the country, aren't as smart as a no body Russian! I think a few years under Putnan would be a solution for this predominant apathy. People will never wake up, or put down the kool-aid until they are punished first.
If Pearl Harbor happened in 2008, we would all be working in rice fields and having our heads chopped of by the rulers we don't play subservant to.
konaneComment by konane - May 31, 2008, 3:02 pm
Thanks MeFirstYouLast! You said "I think a few years under Putnan would be a solution for this predominant apathy."

Poison of apathy has been administered in slow doses over the past 50+ years believing we'll not notice until it's past too late.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.