Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 5:04 am
You last visited May 27, 2017, 3:54 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Hillary back in the 70's

Published:

Last Edited: June 30, 2008, 12:32 pm

Stumbled on this checking out something else.  First link to Neal Boortz for a summary of events, next links are two articles used to base this summary. 

 Times, dates events and people cited for historical verifiable reference.


 

"HILLARY FIRED? SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISBARRED!

"......... Ok .. so here we go with the abbreviated version of Hillary's shenanigans when she was working for the House Judiciary Committee during the Nixon impeachment mess. If you want the full story click here to read the column by Dan Calabrese.
  • Hillary Rodham gets a spot on the legal staff of the House Judiciary Committee upon the recommendation of a lawyer pal of Ted Kennedy.
  • The man who hires Hillary is Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat.
  • The House Judiciary Committee is investigating Richard Nixon with an eye on impeachment.
  • A question arises as to whether or not Nixon is legally entitled to counsel during the investigation. If so, his council would be allowed to cross examine witnesses appearing before the panel.
  • The concern about having counsel for Nixon cross examine witnesses centered on E. Howard Hunt. Democrats on the committee feared that Nixon's counsel would elicit information from Hunt that would be very damaging to the Kennedys.
  • Zeifman tells Hillary that Nixon is entitled to counsel. He cites documents in the committee's public file referencing the fact that Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas had representation four years earlier while he was being investigated.
  • Hillary removes the documents from the committees public file and places them under lock and key in her office where they are not available for media or public scrutiny.
  • Hillary then prepares a brief for filing with a federal judge which falsely states that there is no precedent for an official being investigated by the committee to have legal representation during that investigation.
  • Nixon resigns before Hillary has a chance to submit the brief in which she makes knowingly false claims.
  • Zeifman then fires Hillary. Hillary asks for a letter of recommendation. Zeifman says no. This was only the third time in Zeifman's 17 years with the committee that he had refused a letter of recommendation.

Zeifman told Dan Calabrese that if Hillary had actually submitted the brief she most likely would have been disbarred. We're trying to arrange for Jerry Zeifman to be a guest on the show today.

So .. all you Hillary fans out there. Here we have your hero once again hiding documents that could be damaging to her cause (Rose Law Firm billing records, Vince Foster's files) and then committing an unethical act in preparing a brief on a point of law she knew to be false. And you want this lady to be our president?

Oh ... and why haven't we heard about this before? It seems to me that the media would be interested in this level of dishonesty and unethical behavior by Hillary Clinton.  "

http://boortz.com/nuze/200804/04022008.html

_____________________________________________ 

March 31, 2008

"Watergate-Era Judiciary Chief of Staff: Hillary Clinton Fired For Lies, Unethical Behavior

.......... Zeifman says he was urged by top committee members to keep a diary of everything that was happening. He did so, and still has the diary if anyone wants to check the veracity of his story. Certainly, he could not have known in 1974 that diary entries about a young lawyer named Hillary Rodham would be of interest to anyone 34 years later.

But they show that the pattern of lies, deceit, fabrications and unethical behavior was established long ago – long before the Bosnia lie, and indeed, even before cattle futures, Travelgate and Whitewater – for the woman who is still asking us to make her president of the United States. " 

http://www.northstarwriters.com/dc163.htm
________________________________________________
 
Followup:
Hillary Clinton and Watergate: Corroboration of 'Stupid, Politically Tone-Deaf' Behavior - April 7, 2008
http://www.northstarwriters.com/dc165.htm
Entry #831

Comments

1.
jarasanComment by jarasan - June 30, 2008, 1:36 pm
This is still being suppressed, state of denial, what they don't know won't hurt them, ignorance is bliss, stupid is as stupid does, my dog ate my homework, I forgot, it doesn't matter, not relevant, Sham Wow. She should be impeached for lying to the people of NY and the rest of us, she should just step down gracefully and go away.
2.
Comment by scorpio - June 30, 2008, 3:45 pm
george bush was taught everything he knows by his job with nixon,and it shows nixon taught him how to get away with a lot to hurt the american people,now that's payback!
3.
time*treatComment by time*treat - June 30, 2008, 4:47 pm
If an incident is too abstruse to explain in 10 seconds or less, it didn't happen.
4.
Comment by Gentlespirit - June 30, 2008, 4:55 pm
I never was a Hillary fan...and I too wish she would just disappear!!!
5.
konaneComment by konane - June 30, 2008, 5:32 pm
Thanks Jarasan! Agree w/ all you said. Links to this were in response to the possibility of her being nominated to the Supreme Court. Shudder!!

Thanks Scorpio!

Thanks Time*treat! Took about 10 seconds or so to read Boortz summary of the incident. As a currently licensed attorney in Georgia he has a way of getting to the heart of the matter quickly.

Thanks Gentlespirit! I never believed what she said or trusted her motives. This is just the latest documented revelation. Now hopefully back to feel-good articles. Politics has way too many [energy] cooties in the form of lower emotion and generated drama used as a means to control.
6.
time*treatComment by time*treat - June 30, 2008, 6:29 pm
I should clarify, the average person won't get riled up about something like this because it takes too much effort to dig up. You know the press has been aware of this forever, but it never came up during the primaries. That's no accident. Now, if it were about Britney or Paris...
7.
konaneComment by konane - June 30, 2008, 7:59 pm
Thanks Time*treat. Yes 10 second sound bites for short attention spanners ..... and yes Britney, Paris etc.
8.
justxploringComment by justxploring - June 30, 2008, 8:50 pm
We were raised to be ladies, not to speak up unless spoken to, and always to smile while we politely curtsy. I'm just a few years younger than Senator Clinton, and oh do I wish I had her brilliance, her intellectualism, her self-confidence, her determination to get things done and never give up hope.

Unfortunately, when any woman is strong, doesn't care if she's not one of the girls, has emerged from her husband's shadow as a political force to be reckoned with, then she's a *B* a *C* and people will continue to come up with just about anything to discredit her accomplishments.
9.
konaneComment by konane - June 30, 2008, 9:43 pm
Just x   ~~~~~~ Follow the crumb trail as far as legalities Mr. Boortz stated below. Legal stuff is 1 - 2- 3 logical and very easy to decipher when you read the chronology of documented facts.

It ain't about sit down and shut up. Her actions discredited her, she got caught with her hand in the cookie jar and it's historically documented.
10.
jarasanComment by jarasan - July 1, 2008, 6:49 am
JX the fact she is woman is justanother xcuse. For petes sake, look at Margaret Thatcher, if Hillary had 2% of the integrity Thatcher had well....................................... Every time the truth is staring at libs in the face they fall back on the blame game, the blame game is pathetic and used up.
11.
konaneComment by konane - July 1, 2008, 7:32 am
Thanks Jarasan! We're all people first ....... and as a woman I'm OVER hearing about the woman versus man issues constantly stirred by the media like fresh steamy piles on a frosty morning.

Media = tumblebugs.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.