- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 7:48 am
You last visited
April 23, 2024, 8:39 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Lucky For Life. The top prize may suck, but everything else...
Published:
Updated:
I know CASHOnly is probably going to come to my house and maim me, but I've been playing Lucky For Life, and you know what, it's a nice little game. I won $10 in the Instant Win feature last Sunday, which is great because that truly is instant gratification. No scratching or anything. But why is it a mandatory feature? Why can't it be optional like SC's Add-A-Play? And why can't all the other games have their own optional instant win feature? And it's also a dying breed, by that I mean the low matrix pick-6 game. Nowadays it seems like a 6/42 is a low matrix. But only six traditional pick-6 games have matrixes lower than 6/42 (AZ, DC, LA, PA, WI, and WV). But anyway, the payouts for the actual draw are pretty good for the most part, considering the other half of the $2 went to the instant win. Especially the 5/6 payout of $2000, for a 6/38 that's phenomenal. Lotto South doesn't even pay out $2,000 for a 5/6 and that's a 6/49 (a pretty good one at that). But I do agree with CO with one thing, the game needs a cash option, about $500,000 to be exact. That's a pretty good prize for a 6/38, comparable to DE Lotto's avg. jackpot in it's heyday.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register