Here’s an expansion on a half-baked set of assumptions that will probably be laid to rest
with the PB draw tomorrow night:

Premise 1)  PB and MM have enjoyed a triple-helix spiral relationship from their
earliest times.

Premise 2)  The numbers in each draw are ‘controlled’ by the highest numbers in a three-
draw set, PB/MM/PB, or MM/PB/MM.  Every high-end number, or combination of
numbers has a complex ‘pool’ of smaller numbers associated with it.  These associations
have been established over a long series of draws and have become somewhat rigid.

Premise 3)  The introduction of a pool of higher numbers without the history of
association as a result of the MM matrix change will squeeze, jar and rattle the helix
pattern because of the larger pool of high-end numbers now forced into the same number
of draws as before.  The old associations won’t dissolve immediately, maybe not at all. 
But the ‘driver’ numbers on PB between 40 and 53 will feel an increased pressure to hit
PB, instead of MM, because of the reduction in square footage of living quarters on MM.

This phenomenon should manifest itself on the PB draw tomorrow night, if it happens to
be true, which, of course, it isn’t.

Jack