Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 1:39 am
You last visited January 20, 2017, 12:40 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Scientists find ACTIVE super thermite in WTC dust

Published:

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html

Although the presence of thermite in the dust had already been established, this discovery takes it to another level.  There is unburned thermite in the dust that is still highly combustible.  The story is going mainstream online but I've only heard crickets from the black box in the living room.

The one piece of evidence they had no control over was the tons of dust generated by the explosions and demolition.  In that dust lies the proof.   Forensics 101.

The three WTC buildings came down as a result of demolition, not two jets and jet fuel.

The real 9/11 investigation should begin today and Controlled Demolitions, Inc. should be the first suspect to question.

Entry #186

Comments

1.
Rick GComment by Rick G - April 5, 2009, 2:43 pm
UPDATE: WOW, I am blown away! Raw Story HAS TAKEN THE STORY DOWN. It appears nowhere on their site now! This is highly unusual for this site, known for its hard-hitting, investigative journalism.   They could be counted on for tackling the tough stories. No mas.

This story must have really hit a nerve. Here is a link to the original source:

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Et tu, Brute?
2.
justxploringComment by justxploring - April 5, 2009, 2:57 pm
Thanks, Rick. I've said it before - I knew people who lived in NY in 2001 and they said the collapse of the buildings looked just like a demolition project. That said, didn't a hotel in China collapse after intense heat from a fireworks mishap? Still, any investigation should be followed through to make sure the American people, especially the families of the victims, get the whole truth.
3.
time*treatComment by time*treat - April 5, 2009, 3:31 pm
As with most "big" events, I suspect nothing serious will be mentioned in the lame-stream for another 40-plus years; after the major players are mostly dead.
4.
Rick GComment by Rick G - April 5, 2009, 3:40 pm
Nancy, no that hotel in China burned for many hours (16?) completely engulfed in flames and it didn't collapse or lose any structural integrity.

The fact that Raw Story has sold out is already becoming a story of its own at other sites.

In case the Raw Story link above doesn't work, here is the original text of the article:

A team of nine scientists have unearthed startling data from dust gathered in the days and weeks after the World Trade Center towers collapsed on 9/11. They discovered that scattered throughout the dust samples were red and gray chips of 'active thermitic material', or an un-reacted pyrotechnic explosive.

Thermite is used in steel welding, fireworks shows, and hand grenades. It is the combination of a metal powder and a metal oxide which produce a reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time. The 'active thermitic material' discovered in the World Trade Center dust was a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide, and is a form of thermite known as 'nano-structured super-thermite'.

“These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere; available papers describe this material as an intimate mixture of UFG[Ultra-fine grain] aluminum and iron oxide in nano-thermite composites to form pyrotechnics or explosives. Commercially available thermite behaves as an incendiary when ignited, but when the ingredients are ultra-fine grain and are intimately mixed, this 'nano-thermite' reacts very rapidly, even explosively, and is sometimes referred to as 'super-thermite',” the report explains.

The full article in The Open Chemical Physics Journal can be found here. http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

Some of the authors of the paper have lost their jobs at universities and chemistry labs for their outspoken breakdown of what happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11. Kevin Ryan lost his job as a lab director after writing a letter to the National Institute for Standards and Technology(NIST was conducting an investigation into 9/11 at the time) challenging the common theory that burning jet fuel weakened the steel supports holding up the 110-story skyscrapers. Ryan claims that the owner of his laboratory subsidiary "was the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings,” according to the South Bend Tribune. Dr. Steven E. Jones, a physicist at Brigham Young University, presented a paper in 2005 discussing alternative theories to the commonly accepted 'jet fuel' reasoning. In September 2006 he was placed on paid administrative leave and his paper was removed from the BYU database.

Jones has told Visibility911.com, "In short, the paper explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings."

Parts of the report mention other studies being conducted by the scientists that will come out soon.

###
5.
jarasanComment by jarasan - April 5, 2009, 4:19 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySHgiUxnLC0&feature=player_embedded
6.
time*treatComment by time*treat - April 5, 2009, 6:17 pm
@Rick G: Link working again... for the moment. :)
7.
Rick GComment by Rick G - April 5, 2009, 9:06 pm
Thanks, t*t.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.