Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 5:32 am
You last visited May 27, 2017, 3:54 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

1000 Architects And Engineers Call For New 9/11 Investigation

Published:

Last Edited: February 20, 2010, 1:06 pm

Source:  http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20100219/pl_usnw/DC57612_1


[Bold highlighting is mine.]


1000 Architects and Engineers Call For New 9/11 investigation


SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 19 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Richard Gage, AIA, architect and founder of the non-profit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. (AE911Truth), will announce a decisive milestone today at a press conference in San Francisco, as more than 1,000 worldwide architects and engineers now support the call for a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. After careful examination of the official explanation, along with the forensic data omitted from official reports, these professionals have concluded that a new independent investigation into these mysterious collapses is needed.

Mr. Gage will deliver the news around this major development, accompanied by signers of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition. The press conference will be held concurrently in 38 cities in 6 countries. http://www.ae911truth.org

These prominent architectural and engineering professionals will discuss the organization's findings and concerns. A brief presentation of the explosive evidence they have compiled will be followed by Q & A. The presentation is an important update of "9/11: Blueprint for Truth – The Architecture of Destruction," the DVD produced by the organization, and available on their website AE911Truth.org, which analyzes  the scientific forensic evidence concluding that the three skyscrapers in New York City were demolished with explosives on 9/11.  The petition will be delivered today to every congressional representative by AE911Truth petition signers throughout the country.  Government officials will be notified that "Misprision of Treason", US Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a serious federal offense which requires those with evidence of treason to act.  

Gage and his group base their conclusions on forensic evidence. Gage states, "The official FEMA and NIST reports provide insufficient, contradictory, and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers' destruction.  We are therefore calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials.  Gage points out the destruction of the third high-rise, World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in pure free-fall acceleration for more than 100 feet, a significant fact that NIST has been forced to admit, due to research conducted by AE911Truth petition signers. Other disturbing facts emerging from the forensic evidence include:

    * Complete destruction of both Twin Towers in just 10 to 14 seconds at near free-fall acceleration  
    * Over 100 first-responder reports of explosions and flashes at onset of destruction
    * Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph
    * Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
    * 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors seen in the debris pile
    * Several tons of molten metal found in debris.  
    * Evidence of advanced explosive nano-thermitic composite material found in the WTC dust by an international team of scientists


AE911Truth's conclusions are shared by thousands of scientists; senior-level military, intelligence and government officials; pilots and aviation professionals; firefighters; scholars and university professors; and 9/11 survivors and their family members.  The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Sheikh Mohammed trial.  [Note: The real reason they don't want a criminal trial in New York is because this evidence could be brought to trial.  -R.G.]

The 9/11 Truth Movement, which Time magazine in 2006 called "a mainstream political reality," continues to gain momentum.   As AE911Truth's own influence grows, Gage has embarked on well over 130 speaking events, covering 20 states and 13 countries, including Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. He has been interviewed by media around the world – including the BBC, CBC, NatGeo, and Fox TV.  

SOURCE Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc.

Entry #202

Comments

1.
four4meComment by four4me - February 20, 2010, 1:47 pm
I'm not an engineer but as a machinist i agree that something is fishy. I have worked with structural steel built a few tall buildings here in MD i just don't see how the towers collapsed just from their own weight.
2.
Rick GComment by Rick G - February 20, 2010, 2:13 pm
@four4me, Thanks for the input. 9/11 was the biggest crime in US history and deserves a thorough investigation. Even some of the 9/11 Commissioners have expressed doubts about their own report.

Something to consider: When people take the time to examine the scientific evidence, they all agree that a real investigation must take place. Nobody who has examined the scientific evidence has changed their mind to support the official story.
3.
konaneComment by konane - February 20, 2010, 3:07 pm
We'll need to elect a whole new congress and administration for any kind of meaningful investigation to take place.
4.
Rick GComment by Rick G - February 20, 2010, 4:04 pm
Thanks, konane...One has to wonder why anyone would object to a more thorough investigation of this crime. Homicide investigations do not have a statute of limitations. The FBI has still not named Osama bin Laden as a suspect in the case because in their own words, "there's not enough evidence." Therefore it is an open case and all new evidence is pertinent and must be examined by REAL law enforcement agencies, not a "commission".
5.
time*treatComment by time*treat - February 20, 2010, 9:25 pm
I think even an entire election sweep wouldn't do the job. We seem to have at least two gov'ts and only *one* of those is elected. Remember the flak our elected admin caught after the attempted exploits of Underpants-bin-bombin, even after his own father called ahead and warned about him? Then we find out he had been given an 'assist' to get on the plane in order to go after larger fish. The folks we get to 'elect' take the praise or blame, but they clearly are not in charge.
6.
time*treatComment by time*treat - February 20, 2010, 9:34 pm
Just in case elections *do* matter, is anyone following the Tx gov race? ;^)
7.
justxploringComment by justxploring - February 20, 2010, 11:33 pm
I don't see how anyone can question that a plane flying into a building can cause so much damage after watching the scene in Austin the other day. That was only a small private plane, not a jumbo jetliner.   Also, as much as I disliked the last administration, I don't think George Bush is evil and would plan such a tragic, horrific invasion.

However, I also support the American public's right to question our government.   Something is definitely being covered up. I'm not an engineer, but I remember the quality of cell phone service in 2001. Many people agree, including cell phone experts, that it would have been close to impossible for all those people to make a connection from a cell phone in a moving plane traveling above 10,000 feet.     Even if a few people reached someone on the ground, the conversation would have been breaking up or dropped, not clear. Even this afternoon in 2010, I told someone "Sorry, I'm breaking up. I'm inside a concrete block building."   Yet one of the frantic 9/11 calls came from the inside of a plane restroom??

Anyway, Al-Qaeda has taken credit for the 9/11 attacks. Why would they do that? They even celebrated it on national TV. Or is the news media also part of the conspiracy?



8.
time*treatComment by time*treat - February 21, 2010, 12:03 am
They've already admitted the claims of so many cell calls was false.
What I want to know is why the Austin damage was so extensive, while the building in Tampa just brushed its shoulders off. www.sptimes.com/2002/01/06/TampaBay/Plane_hits_skyscraper.shtml
9.
Rick GComment by Rick G - February 21, 2010, 7:21 am
We can't get bogged down in the details of phone calls, etc. at this time. There is a cesspool of disinformation on the internet surrounding the details. The scientific and eyewitness evidence of a controlled demolition is provable beyond a reasonable doubt. The demolitions are the smoking gun.   OBL & Co. didn't have access to military-grade thermite, they didn't have access to the buildings to place the charges and they didn't have the expertise to pull off a perfect controlled demolition.

Therefore, the ones responsible for the collapse of the three WTC towers are still free men. The investigation must continue.
10.
Rick GComment by Rick G - February 21, 2010, 7:54 am
NIST, who conducted the investigation into why the buildings collapsed, ruled out explosives. NIST has an extensive background in explosives and thermite. It would have been impossible to rule out explosives in their investigation based upon the evidence found by independent scientists. That is why AE911truth is calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST.

11.
LadyMylenaComment by LadyMylena - February 24, 2010, 6:20 am
Well, like a conversation I was having on Facebook the other day, it was brought up that if Bush was not involved (which, it is ONLY my opinion, but I think he is very evil, but only one of MANY) in the 9/11 incident, then WHY did he remain in a classroom, reading a "My Pet GOAT" book, upside down..when common sense tells us in a REAL emergency, our president would've been immediately whisked off by Secret Service into the secure location, and NOT still be sitting in a classroom with kids. I objectively looked at the whole mess for a few years, and came to the conclusion, that yes, I smell a RAT, and it stinks BAD! I think the A & E for 9/11 are doing a great job, and I spread their link, every chance I get.

As far as an election sweep is concerned, I think they ALL should be removed from office. Guilty until proven innocent. The guilty ones arrested, and justice served (whatever justice is deemed necessary). Real people with no motive other than to better our country, should run it. It's time to take the "elite" out with the trash!!
12.
Rick GComment by Rick G - February 26, 2010, 7:39 am
@LadyM...Exactly. Sherlock Holmes' --> "The Dog That Didn't Bark".
The secret service did not remove him from the building for another half hour, even though the event was well publicized and any foreign attackers would know his whereabouts for targeting him. An entire school full of children was being placed in jeopardy by his continued presence there. Not only was he allowed to continue reading, but the scheduled media event afterward was still held. After the media event when it was suggested they leave the school he was quoted by his staff as saying, "I'm not ready to leave yet. In fact, I'm hungry. I want a hamburger."

Three keys to complicity:

1) The president's non-reaction and the secret service non-reaction for thirty minutes.
2) NORAD inability to intercept any of four hijacked jets for one hour fifty minutes from the first hijacking until F93 crash in PA.
3) Leon Panetta's testimony of Cheney's response to his aide who was tracking the jet/missile as it was approaching the pentagon ("ten miles out...do the orders still stand, sir?"). "Of course they still stand. Has anyone told you anything different?"

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.